Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Cardioversion by Vernakalant and Comparators in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Rate and rhythm control are two well established treatment objectives for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. While symptom reduction is a primary treatment goal, therapeutic practice related to cardioversion varies by region and patient, with several precautions associated with the use of current therapies. No comprehensive literature review on the relative efficacy of existing cardioversion approaches compared to newly available therapies has been conducted.
Methods and results
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic therapies in eliciting cardioversion within 2 and 8–24 h among patients with recent-onset, short duration AF. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials in which cardioversion rates were evaluated in at least 2 treatment groups. Bayesian mixed-treatment comparisons estimated odds ratios (95% credible intervals) for successful cardioversion. Results within 2 h showed vernakalant IV, propafenone IV and flecainide (IV and oral) were more efficacious in pair-wise comparisons to placebo. Results were mixed in analyses comparing efficacy rates between 8 and 24 h. Few adverse events were reported, with the most common being bradycardia and hypotension.
In pair-wise comparisons of active treatment arms to one another, results suggest vernakalant IV, propafenone IV and flecainide appear to be effective in achieving rapid cardioversion in patients with short duration AF compared to other agents. Application of these findings to clinical practice need to account for the variable comorbidity profiles of patients, important determinants in the selection of appropriate therapy for individual patients. Though best practice methods were used, further research comparing treatments through direct head-to-head comparisons may be warranted to confirm these findings and further inform clinical practice.
- Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. Population prevalence, incidence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study. Heart. 2001;86:516–21. CrossRef
- Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370–5. CrossRef
- Ringborg A, Nieuwlaat R, Lindgren P, Jonsson B, Fidan D, Maggioni AP, et al. Costs of atrial fibrillation in five European countries: results from the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2008;10:403–11. CrossRef
- Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Kors JA, van Herpen G, Stricker BH, et al. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:949–53. CrossRef
- Blaauw Y, Crijns HJGM. Treatment of atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2008;94:1342–9. CrossRef
- Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: The Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2369–429.
- Cosio FG, Aliot E, Botto GL, Heidbuchel H, Geller CJ, Kirchhof P, et al. Delayed rhythm control of atrial fibrillation may be a cause of failure to prevent recurrences: reasons for change to active antiarrhythmic treatment at the time of the first detected episode. Europace. 2008;10:21–7. CrossRef
- Lip GY, Tse HF. Management of atrial fibrillation. Lancet. 2007;370:604–18. CrossRef
- National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Atrial Fibrillation: National clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care. 2006. London, Royal College of Physicians.
- Al Khatib SM, Shaw LK, Lee KL, O’Connor C, Califf RM. Is rhythm control superior to rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure? Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:797–800. CrossRef
- Freudenberger RS, Wilson AC, Kostis JB. Comparison of rate versus rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (from the AFFIRM Study). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:247–52. CrossRef
- Opolski G, Torbicki A, Kosior DA, Szulc M, Wozakowska-Kaplon B, Kolodziej P, et al. Rate control vs rhythm control in patients with nonvalvular persistent atrial fibrillation: the results of the Polish How to Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (HOT CAFE) Study. Chest. 2004;126:476–86. CrossRef
- Pietrasik A, Kosior DA, Niewada M, Opolski G, Latek M, Kaminski B. The cost comparison of rhythm and rate control strategies in persistent atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2007;118:21–7. CrossRef
- Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, Wyse DG, Dorian P, Lee KL, et al. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2667–77. CrossRef
- Yildiz A, Yigit Z, Okcun B, Baskurt M, Ortak K, Kaya A, et al. Comparison of rate and rhythm control in hypertension patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2008;72:705–8. CrossRef
- Schilling RJ. Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Heart. 2010;96:333–8. CrossRef
- Wijffels MC, Kirchhof CJ, Dorland R, Allessie MA. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation. 1995;92:1954–68.
- Burashnikov A, Antzelevitch C. New developments in atrial antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:139–48. CrossRef
- Cain ME, Curtis AB. Rhythm control in atrial fibrillation–one setback after another. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2725–7. CrossRef
- Cohen M, Naccarelli GV. Pathophysiology and disease progression of atrial fibrillation: importance of achieving and maintaining sinus rhythm. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:885–90. CrossRef
- Govindan M, Savelieva I, Catanchin A, Camm AJ. Atrial fibrillation-the final frontier. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2010;15:36S–50. CrossRef
- Humphries KH, Kerr CR, Steinbuch M, Dorian P. Limitations to antiarrhythmic drug use in patients with atrial fibrillation. CMAJ. 2004;171:741–5. CrossRef
- Kirchhof P. Can we improve outcomes in AF patients by early therapy? BMC Med. 2009;7:72. CrossRef
- Morrow JP, Cannon CP, Reiffel JA. New antiarrhythmic drugs for establishing sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: what are our therapies likely to be by 2010 and beyond? Am Heart J. 2007;154:824–9. CrossRef
- Roden DM. Risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapy. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:785–91. CrossRef
- Savelieva I, Camm J. Anti-arrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation: current anti-arrhythmic drugs, investigational agents, and innovative approaches. Europace. 2008;10:647–65. CrossRef
- Schmitt J, Ehrlich JR, Hohnloser SH. New antiarrhythmic drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Herz. 2008;33:562–7. CrossRef
- Viswanathan MN, Page RL. Pharmacological therapy for atrial fibrillation: current options and new agents. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18:417–31. CrossRef
- Ehrlich JR, Nattel S. Novel approaches for pharmacological management of atrial fibrillation. Drugs. 2009;69:757–74. CrossRef
- Dorian P, Pinter A, Mangat I, Korley V, Cvitkovic SS, Beatch GN. The effect of vernakalant (RSD1235), an investigational antiarrhythmic agent, on atrial electrophysiology in humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007;50:35–40. CrossRef
- Fedida D. Vernakalant (RSD1235): a novel, atrial-selective antifibrillatory agent. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007;16:519–32. CrossRef
- Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ. 2005;331:897–900. CrossRef
- Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook 4.2.1. The Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2004.
- Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376–80.
- Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–900. CrossRef
- Thomas A, O’Hara B, Ligges U, Sturtz S. Making BUGS Open. R News [ 2006 [cited 2011 Jan. 5]; 6:[12–17]
- Camm AJ, Capucci A, Hohnloser SH, Torp-Pedersen C, Van Gelder IC, Mangal B, et al. A randomized active-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of vernakalant to amiodarone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:313–21. CrossRef
- Pratt C, Roy D, Torp-Pedersen C, Wyse D, Toft E, Juul-Moller S et al. Usefulness of Vernakalant Hydrochloride Injection for Rapid Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:1277–83.
- Bianconi L, Mennuni M. Comparison between propafenone and digoxin administered intravenously to patients with acute atrial fibrillation. PAFIT-3 Investigators. The Propafenone in Atrial Fibrillation Italian Trial. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:584–8. CrossRef
- Kondili A, Kastrati A, Popa Y. Comparative evaluation of verapamil, flecainide and propafenone for the acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1990;102:510–3.
- Roy D, Pratt CM, Torp-Pedersen C, Wyse DG, Toft E, Juul-Moller S, et al. Vernakalant hydrochloride for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation. 2008;117:1518–25. CrossRef
- Thomas SP, Guy D, Wallace E, Crampton R, Kijvanit P, Eipper V, et al. Rapid loading of sotalol or amiodarone for management of recent onset symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized, digoxin-controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2004;147:E3. CrossRef
- Cowan JC, Gardiner P, Reid DS, Newell DJ, Campbell RW. Amiodarone in the management of atrial fibrillation complicating myocardial infarction. Br J Clin Pract. 1986;44:155–63.
- Hofmann R, Steinwender C, Kammler J, Kypta A, Leisch F. Effects of a high dose intravenous bolus amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation and a rapid ventricular rate. Int J Cardiol. 2006;110:27–32. CrossRef
- Griffin S, Bojke L, Main C, Palmer S. Incorporating direct and indirect evidence using bayesian methods: an applied case study in ovarian cancer. Value Health. 2006;9:123–31. CrossRef
- Roseman M, Milette K, Bero LA, Coyne JC, Lexchin J, Turner EH, et al. Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments. JAMA. 2011;305:1008–17. CrossRef
- Tambocor™. 2007. Bishop’s Stortford, UK, Meda Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
- Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Hamilos ME, Marketou ME, Chlouverakis GI, Vardas PE. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of procainamide versus propafenone versus amiodarone for the conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1721–5. CrossRef
- Kafkas NV, Patsilinakos SP, Mertzanos GA, Papageorgiou KI, Chaveles JI, Dagadaki OK, et al. Conversion efficacy of intravenous ibutilide compared with intravenous amiodarone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Int J Cardiol. 2007;118:321–5. CrossRef
- Xanthos T, Bassiakou E, Vlachos IS, Bassiakos S, Michalakis K, Moutzouris DA, et al. Intravenous and oral administration of amiodarone for the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation after digoxin administration. Int J Cardiol. 2007;121:291–5. CrossRef
- Crijns HJ, van Wijk LM, van Gilst WH, Kingma JH, Van Gelder IC, Lie KI. Acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: clinical efficacy of flecainide acetate. Comparison of two regimens. Eur Heart J. 1988;9:634–8.
- Kingma JH, Suttorp MJ. Acute pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter: the role of flecainide, propafenone, and verapamil. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:56A–60A. CrossRef
- Bash L, Avetisyan R, Davies G, Buono J, Fahrbach K, Martin A et al. Systematic Review and meta-analysis: comparative effectiveness of cardioversion treatments at 2 h for atrial fibrillation. American Heart Association Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism and Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention Joint Conference, Atlanta, GA. 3-24-2011.
- Naccarelli GV, Wolbrette DL, Khan M, Bhatta L, Hynes J, Samii S, et al. Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: comparative efficacy and results of trials. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:15D–26D. CrossRef
- Ruigomez A, Johansson S, Wallander MA, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Predictors and prognosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in general practice in the UK. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5:20. CrossRef
- Alp NJ, Bell JA, Shahi M. Randomised double blind trial of oral versus intravenous flecainide for the cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2000;84:37–40. CrossRef
- Azpitarte J, Alvarez M, Baun O, Garcia R, Moreno E, Martin F, et al. Value of single oral loading dose of propafenone in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:1649–54.
- Blanc JJ, Voinov C, Maarek M. Comparison of oral loading dose of propafenone and amiodarone for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation. PARSIFAL Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:1029–32. CrossRef
- Boriani G, Capucci A, Lenzi T, Sanguinetti M, Magnani B. Propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. A controlled comparison between oral loading dose and intravenous administration. Chest. 1995;108:355–8. CrossRef
- Botto GL, Capucci A, Bonini W, Boriani G, Broffoni T, Barone P, et al. Conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm using a single oral loading dose of propafenone: comparison of two regimens. Int J Cardiol. 1997;58:55–61. CrossRef
- Botto GL, Bonini W, Broffoni T, Espureo M, Cappelletti G, Lombardi R, et al. Randomized, crossover, controlled comparison of oral loading versus intravenous infusion of propafenone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:2480–4. CrossRef
- Capucci A, Villani GQ, Aschieri D, Piepoli M. Safety of oral propafenone in the conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a prospective parallel placebo-controlled multicentre study. Int J Cardiol. 1999;68:187–96. CrossRef
- Cotter G, Blatt A, Kaluski E, Metzkor-Cotter E, Koren M, Litinski I, et al. Conversion of recent onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm: the effect of no treatment and high-dose amiodarone. A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:1833–42. CrossRef
- Donovan KD, Power BM, Hockings BE, Dobb GJ, Lee KY. Intravenous flecainide versus amiodarone for recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:693–7. CrossRef
- Fresco C, Proclemer A, Pavan A, Buia G, Vicentini A, Pavan D, et al. Intravenous propafenone in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Italian Trial (PAFIT)-2 Investigators. Clin Cardiol. 1996;19:409–12. CrossRef
- Ganau G, Lenzi T. Intravenous propafenone for converting recent onset atrial fibrillation in emergency departments: a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial. FAPS Investigators Study Group. J Emerg Med. 1998;16:383–7. CrossRef
- Madonia S, De Simone M, Brai G, Gozzo D, Gristina A, Luciano L, et al. Intravenous versus oral initial load of propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation in the emergency room: a randomized trial. Ital Heart J. 2000;1:475–9.
- Madrid A, Moro C, Marin-Huerta E, Mestre J, Novo L, Costa A. Comparison of flecainide and procainamide in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1127–31. CrossRef
- Reisinger J, Gatterer E, Lang W, Vanicek T, Eisserer G, Bachleitner T, et al. Flecainide versus ibutilide for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of recent onset. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1318–24. CrossRef
- Roy D, Rowe BH, Stiell IG, Coutu B, Ip JH, Phaneuf D, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of RSD1235, a novel anti-arrhythmic agent, in the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2355–61. CrossRef
- Bellandi F, Cantini F, Pedone T, Palchetti R, Bamoshmoosh M, Dabizzi R. Effectiveness of intravenous propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled study. Clin Cardiol. 1995;18:631–4. CrossRef
- Boriani G, Biffi M, Capucci A, Botto G, Broffoni T, Rubino I, et al. Oral propafenone to convert recent-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with and without underlying heart disease. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:621–5.
- Capucci A, Lenzi T, Boriani G, Trisolino G, Binetti N, Cavazza M, et al. Effectiveness of loading oral flecainide for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in patients without organic heart disease or with only systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:69–72. CrossRef
- Capucci A, Boriani G, Botto GL, Lenzi T, Rubino I, Falcone C, et al. Conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation by a single oral loading dose of propafenone or flecainide. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:503–5. CrossRef
- Joseph A, Ward M. A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of sotalol, amiodarone, and digoxin for the reversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36:1–9. CrossRef
- Peuhkurinen K, Niemela M, Ylitalo A, Linnaluoto M, Lilja M, Juvonen J. Effectiveness of amiodarone as a single oral dose for recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:462–5. CrossRef
- Siu C, Lau C, Lee W, Lam K, Tse H. Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2174–9. CrossRef
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Cardioversion by Vernakalant and Comparators in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Volume 26, Issue 2 , pp 167-179
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Atrial fibrillation
- Cardioversion efficacy
- SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
- Industry Sectors