Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography
Received: 14 July 2004 Accepted: 26 October 2004 DOI:
Cite this article as: Gerber, T.C., Kuzo, R.S. & Morin, R.L. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2005) 21: 165. doi:10.1007/s10554-004-5338-6 Abstract
With increasing clinical use of cardiac CT imaging it is important that all health care providers referring for or administering such examinations are familiar with the concepts and values of radiation dosimetry in CT as well as with the basic principles of radiation protection. There are important technical differences pertinent to radiation dose between the CT scanner types that are currently being used for imaging of the heart and coronary arteries. As a result of these differences, the radiation dose typically is higher when a cardiac examination is performed with multidetector-row CT (MDCT) than when it is performed with electron beam CT. Several techniques have been described to reduce radiation dose of MDCT imaging by varying the X-ray tube current during a CT examination. The volume computed tomographic dose index (CTDI
vol), the dose length product (DLP), and the effective dose (E) are the most useful parameters to describe and compare radiation doses received from cardiac CT examinations. When comparing radiation doses between scanning protocols and scanner types, the degree of image noise must be considered. Diagnostic, rather than aesthetic, quality of images should be the most important factor guiding the development of scanning protocols for cardiac CT imaging. Cardiac CT examinations should be ordered only by qualified health care providers, and the ordering clinicians should be aware of their responsibility of weighing risks of the radiation exposure against the expected benefits. Keywords angiography calcium computed tomography coronary artery disease imaging radiation dose References
Gerber, TC, Kuzo, RS, Karstaedt, N, Lane, GE, Morin, RL, Sheedy, PF, Safford, RE, Blackshear, JL, Pietan, JH 2002 Current results and new developments of coronary angiography with use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc 77 55 71 PubMed
Ropers, D, Ulzheimer, S, Wenkel, E, Baum, U, Giesler, T, Derlien, H, Moshage, W, Bautz, WA, Daniel, WG, Kalender, WA, Achenbach, S 2001 Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88 792 795 CrossRef PubMed
Deibler, AR, Kuzo, RS, Vöhringer, M, Page, EE, Safford, RE, Patton, JN, Lane, GE, Morin, RL, Gerber, TC 2004 Imaging of congenital coronary anomalies with multislice spiral computed tomography. Mayo Clin Proc 79 1017 1023 PubMed CrossRef
Morin, RL, Gerber, TC, McCollough, CH 2003 Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 107 917 922 PubMed
Berrington de Gonzalez, A, Darby, S 2004 Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363 345 351 PubMed
Jakobs, TF, Becker, CR, Ohnesorge, B, Flohr, T, Suess, C, Schoepf, UJ, Reiser, MF 2002 Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12 1081 1086 CrossRef PubMed
Hunold, P, Vogt, FM, Schmermund, A, Debatin, JF, Kerkhoff, G, Budde, T, Erbel, R, Ewen, K, Barkhausen, J 2003 Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226 145 52 PubMed
Trabold, T, Buchgeister, M, Kuttner, A, Heuschmid, M, Kopp, AF, Schroder, S, Claussen, CD 2003 Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. ROFO-Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden V 175 1051 1055
McCollough, CH, Zink, FE 1999 Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys 26 2223 2230 CrossRef PubMed
Boyd, DP, Lipton, MJ 1983 Cardiac computed tomography. Proc IEEE 71 298 307 CrossRef
McCollough, CH, Zink, FE, Morin, RL 1994 Radiation dosimetry for electron beam CT. Radiology 192 637 643 PubMed
GE Healthcare. Computed tomography: E-speed. Available at: http://www.gemedicalsystemseurope.com/euen/rad/ct/products/espeed.html. Accessed June 28, 2004.
Siemens Medical Systems. Shifting Paradigms in CT. Available at: http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/rg_marcom_FBAs/files/brochures/magazi_medical_ solutions/science/Science_Artikel_Speed4D.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2004.
Shope, TB, Gagne, RM, Johnson, GC 1981 A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission X-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 8 488 495 CrossRef PubMed
Cameron, JR, Zimmerman, D, Kenney, G, Buch, R, Bland, R, Grant, R 1964 Thermoluminescent radiation dosimetry utilizing LiF. Health Phys 10 25 29 PubMed CrossRef
Suzuki, A, Suzuki, MN 1978 Use of a pencil-shaped ionization chamber for measurement of exposure resulting from a computed tomography scan. Med Phys 5 536 539 PubMed
Pavlicek, W, Horton, J, Turco, R 1979 Evaluation of the MDH Industries, Inc. pencil chamber for direct beam CT measurements. Health Phys 37 773 774 PubMed
Jucius, RA, Kambic, GX 1980 Measurements of computed tomography X-ray fields utilizing the partial volume effect. Med Phys 7 379 382 PubMed
European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Available at: http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/mainindex.htm. Accessed June 28, 2004.
International Electrotechnical Commission. 2002Medical Electrical Equipment. Part 2-44: Particular Requirements for the Safety of X-ray Equipment for Computed Tomography. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Central Office Geneva, Switzerland
1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1991; 21: 1–201.
McCollough, CH, Schueler, BA 2000 Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27 828 837 PubMed
Morin, RL 1988Monte Carlo Simulation in the Radiological Sciences. CRC Press Boca Raton, FL
Jones, DG, Shrimpton, P. 1991Survey of CT Practice in the U.K. Part 3: Normalised Organ Doses Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques. NRPB 250. National Radiological Protection Board Oxon
Zankl, M, Panzer, W, Drexler, G 1991The Calculation of Dose from External Photon Exposures Using Reference Human Phantoms and Monte Carlo Methods. Part IV: Organ Dose From Computed Tomographic Examinations. GSF-Bericht 30/91. GSF–Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Institut für Strahlenschutz Neuherberg
McCollough, CH 2003 Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography. Herz 28 1 6 PubMed
Kalender, WA, Wolf, H, Suess, C, Gies, M, Greess, H, Bautz, WA 1999 Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 9 323 328 CrossRef PubMed
Gies, M, Kalender, WA, Wolf, H, Suess, C 1999 Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. Med Phys 26 2235 2247 CrossRef PubMed
Kalender, WA, Wolf, H, Suess, C 1999 Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26 2248 2253 CrossRef PubMed
Gerber TC, Stratman BP, Kuzo R, Morin RL. Effect of acquisition technique on radiation dose and image quality in computed tomographic coronary angiography with submillimeter collimation. Invest Radiol (in press).
Gerber, TC, Kuzo, R, Safford, RE 2005 Posterior Mitral Valve Leaflet Prolapse Diagnosed With Multislice Computed Tomography. Heart 91 130 PubMed
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. Available at: http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP_87_CT_s.pps. Accessed June 28, 2004.