Skip to main content
Log in

How Ethically Would Americans and Chinese Negotiate? The Effect of Intra-cultural Versus Inter-cultural Negotiations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A growing body of research has started to examine how individuals from different countries may differ in their use of ethically questionable tactics during business negotiations. Whereas prior research focused on the main effect of the national culture or nationality of the negotiator, we add a new factor, which is the nationality of the counterpart. Looking at both these variables allows us to examine whether and how people may change their likelihood of using ethically questionable tactics in inter-cultural negotiations as opposed to intra-cultural ones. Results of an experiment (N = 810) show that overall, American participants were less likely than Chinese participants to use ethically questionable tactics in negotiations. However, American participants were more likely to use ethically questionable tactics, particularly those related to false promises and inappropriate information gathering, in inter-cultural negotiations with Chinese counterparts, than in intra-cultural negotiations with American counterparts. By contrast, Chinese participants were less likely to use ethically questionable tactics, particularly those related to false promises and attacking opponent’s network, in inter-cultural negotiations with American counterparts, than in intra-cultural negotiations with Chinese counterparts. Implications and future directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this example to us.

  2. We thank another anonymous reviewer for suggesting this possibility to us.

References

  • Adair, W. L., & Brett, J. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adair, W. L., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiation behaviors when cultures collide: The U.S. and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adair, W. L., Taylor, M. S., & Tinsley, C. H. (2009). Starting out on the right foot: Negotiation schemas when cultures collide. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2(2), 138–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, N. J., & Graham, J. L. (1989). Cross-cultural interaction: The international comparison fallacy? Journal of International Business Studies, 20, 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anton, R. J. (1990). Drawing the line: An exploratory test of ethical behavior in negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(3), 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 279–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (Ed.). (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Brett, J. M., & Okumura, T. (1998). Inter-and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (2000). Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 165–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 17–41). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, T. R. (2010). Moral emotions and unethical bargaining: The differential effects of empathy and perspective taking in deterring deceitful negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cryder, C. E., Loewenstein, G., & Scheines, R. (2013). The donor is in the details. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G., & Cramton, P. C. (1991). Shrewd bargaining on the moral frontier: Toward a theory of morality in practice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(2), 135–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elahee, M., Kirby, S. L., & Nasif, E. (2002). National culture, trust and perceptions about ethical behavior in intra- and cross-cultural negotiations: An analysis of the NAFTA countries. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(6), 799–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 276–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folmer, C. P. R., Klapwijk, A., De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2012). One for all: What representing a group may do to us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. N. (1991). When in Rome? The effects of cultural adaptation on intercultural business negotiations. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, I. S., Barry, B., & Long, D. A. (2009). Lying and smiling: Informational and emotional deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 691–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., & Segal, G. (2013). China rising: Nationalism and interdependence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, W. B. (2000). Methodological issues in conducting theory-based cross-cultural research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 293–315). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunia, B. C., Brett, J. M., Nandkeolyar, A. K., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Paying a price: Culture, trust, and negotiation consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendoorn, L., Linssen, H., & Tumanov, S. (Eds.). (2013). Intergroup relations in states of the former Soviet Union: The perception of Russians. New York: Psychology Press.

  • Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 575–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the West. Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan, A., Takada, K., & Hirschler, B. (2013). Analysis: Bribery scandal dents Big Pharma sales in China, GSK hardest hit. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/18/us-china-pharma-sales-analysis-idUSBRE98H07620130918.

  • Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (H. J. Paton, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published in 1785).

  • Lewicki, R. J. (1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model with applications to negotiations. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 86–90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Robinson, R. J. (1998). Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 665–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. A., Friedman, R., Barry, B., Gelfand, M. J., & Zhang, Z. X. (2012). The dynamics of consensus building in intracultural and intercultural negotiations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2), 269–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z. (2010). The SINS in business negotiations: Explore the cross-cultural differences in business ethics between Canada and China. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. A. (2004). The unexpected benefits of final deadlines in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., Menon, T., & Ames, D. R. (2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A., Klink, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natlandsmyr, J. H., & Rognes, J. (1995). Culture, behavior, and negotiation outcomes: A comparative and cross-cultural study of Mexican and Norwegian negotiators. International Journal of Conflict Management, 6, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: Misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 504–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okhuysen, G. A., Galinsky, A. D., & Uptigrove, T. A. (2003). Saving the worst for last: The effect of time horizon on the efficiency of negotiating benefits and burdens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2009). Mutually dependent: Power, trust, affect and the use of deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 347–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2012). U.S. public, experts differ on China policies: Public deeply concerned about China’s economic power. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/09/18/u-s-public-experts-differ-on-china-policies.

  • Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. edn.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

  • Rivers, C. (2009). Negotiating with the Chinese: EANTS and all. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51(5), 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, C., & Lytle, A. L. (2007). Lying, cheating foreigners!! Negotiation ethics across cultures. International Negotiation, 12(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, C., & Volkema, R. (2013). East-West differences in “tricky” tactics: A comparison of the tactical preferences of Chinese and Australian negotiators. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. J., Lewicki, R. J., & Donahue, E. M. (2000). Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: Introducing the SINS scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(6), 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, R., Rupp, D. E., Skarlicki, D. P., & Jones, K. S. (2013). Employee justice across cultures: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 263–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1993). Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W., Lenkert, A., & Jonas, K. (1988). Familiarity may breed contempt: The impact of student exchange on national stereotypes and attitudes. In W. Stroebe, A. W. Kruglanski, D. Bar-Tal, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict (pp. 167–187). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C. H., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). Negotiating in the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 711–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2015). Corruption Perceptions Index 2014: Results. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results.

  • Uhlmann, E. L., Heaphy, E., Ashford, S. J., Zhu, L., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2013). Acting professional: An exploration of culturally bounded norms against nonwork role referencing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 866–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Trade in goods with China. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html.

  • Van Lange, P. A., De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). Self-interest and beyond. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 540–561). Guilford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkema, R. J. (1998). A comparison of perceptions of ethical negotiation behavior in Mexico and the United States. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(3), 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkema, R. (1999). Ethicality in negotiations: An analysis of perceptual similarities and differences between Brazil and the United States. Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkema, R. (2004). Demographic, cultural, and economic predictors of perceived ethicality of negotiation behavior: A nine-country analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkema, R. J., Fleck, D., & Hofmeister-Toth, A. (2004). Ethicality in negotiation: An analysis of attitudes, intentions and outcomes. International Negotiation, 9(2), 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (2002). A golden rule over time: Reciprocity in intergenerational allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1011–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W. A., Moore, C. W., McKinney, J. A., & Longenecker, J. G. (1999). The effects of gender and career stage on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., & Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, C., Cronin, J. J., & Peloza, J. (2015). The role of corporate social responsibility in consumer evaluation of nutrition information disclosure by retail restaurants. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. D., Liu, L. A., & Liu, W. (2014). Trust and deception in negotiation: Culturally divergent effects. Management and Organization Review. doi:10.1111/more.12028.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., De Cremer, D. & Wang, C. How Ethically Would Americans and Chinese Negotiate? The Effect of Intra-cultural Versus Inter-cultural Negotiations. J Bus Ethics 145, 659–670 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2863-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2863-2

Keywords

Navigation