Acero, I., & Alcalde, I. (2012). The effect of monitoring function and advisory function on board structure. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 153, 9–38.
Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance,
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. L. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research,
Blau, G. J. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal,
Brockner, J., & Siegel, P. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research
(pp. 390–413). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef
Bromiley, P., & Cummings, L. L. (1995). Transaction costs in organizations with trust. In R. Bies, B. Sheppard, & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 5, pp. 219–247). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Carpenter, M., & Westphal, J. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision-making. Academy of Management Journal,
Casciaro, T., & Lobo, M. S. (2008). When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Administrative Science Quarterly,
Chiaburu, D. S., & Lim, A. S. (2008). Manager trustworthiness or interactional justice? Predicting organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics,
Chou, L. -F., Wang, A. -C., Wang, T. -Y., Huang, M. -H., & Cheng, B. -S. (2008). Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Human Relations,
Cialdini, R. B. (1996). Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dishonesty. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics (pp. 44–58). New York: Russel Sage.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Creed, W. E., & Miles, R. E. (1996). Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of control. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research
(pp. 16–39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef
Cruz, C. C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Becerra, M. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO–TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal,
Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1995). CEO and director turnover in failing firms: An illusion of change? Strategic Management Journal,
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review,
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review,
Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science,
Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review,
Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy,
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics,
Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2007). Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group & Organization Management,
Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2008). It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiring of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination x power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal,
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review,
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,
Gulati, R., & Westphal, J. D. (1999). Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO–board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly,
Hambrick, D. C., Von Werder, A., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science,
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review,
Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science,
Holmes, J. G. (1981). The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In M. J. Learner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior
(pp. 261–284). New York: Plenum.CrossRef
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology,
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science,
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics,
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory—A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review,
Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal,
Lorsch, J. W., & Macliver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates—The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Lui, S. S. (2009). The roles of competence trust, formal contract, and time horizon in interorganizational learning. Organization Studies,
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Intergrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal,
Mayer, R. J., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review,
Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal,
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal,
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science,
Molm, L. M. (1994). Dependence and risk: Transforming the structure of social exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly,
Nahapiet, J., & Goshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review,
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. -Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics,
Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007). Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods,
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review,
Schoorman, F., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review,
Serva, M. A., & Fuller, M. A. (2004). The effects of trustworthiness perceptions on the formation of initial trust: Implications for MIS student teams. Journal of Information Systems Education,
Shen, W. (2003). The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: An evolutionary perspective. Academy of Management Review,
Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science,
Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. A. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology,
Quah, M. (2006). Singapore companies starting to back away from stock options: Survey. The Business Times. 1.
Spencer Stuart Board Index Canada. (2008). Toronto: Spencer Stuart.
Spencer Stuart Board Index Spain. (2010). Madrid: Spencer Stuart [in Spanish].
Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradox of governance. Academy of Management Review,
Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral performance consequences of CEO–board social ties. Academy of Management Journal,
Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. (2006). The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credential and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly,
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1997). Defections from the inner circle: Social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in US corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly,
Yakovleva, M., Reilly, R. R., & Werko, R. (2010). Why do we trust? Moving beyond individual to dyadic perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Zona, F., & Zattoni, A. (2007). Beyond the black box of demography: Board processes and task effectiveness within Italian firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review,