Clinical Governance, Performance Appraisal and Interactional and Procedural Fairness at a New Zealand Public Hospital
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper explores the conduct of performance appraisals of nurses in a New Zealand hospital, and how fairness is perceived in such appraisals. In the health sector, performance appraisals of medical staff play a key role in implementing clinical governance, which, in turn, is critical to containing health care costs and ensuring quality patient care. Effective appraisals depend on employees perceiving their own appraisals to be fair both in terms of procedure and interaction with their respective appraiser. We examine qualitative data from interviews and focus groups, involving 22 nurses in a single department, to determine whether perceived injustices impact on the effective implementation of the appraisal system. Our results suggest that particular issues had been causing some sense of injustice, and most of these were procedural. Potential solutions focus on greater formalisation of the performance appraisal process, and more training for appraisers and appraisees.
- Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. (2011). Why we hate performance management and why we should love it. Business Horizons, 54(6), 503–507. CrossRef
- Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional injustice, the sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organisational justice (pp. 89–118). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Degeling, P. J., Maxwell, S., Ledema, R., & Hunter, D. J. (2004). Making clinical governance work. British Medical Journal, 329, 679–681. CrossRef
- Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Dipboye, R. L., & Pontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 248–251. CrossRef
- Dulebohn, J. H., & Ferris, G. (1999). The role of influence tactics in perceptions of performance evaluations’ fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3), 288–303. CrossRef
- Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). Procedural justice as a two-dimensional construct: An examination in the performance appraisal context. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 37(2), 205–222. CrossRef
- Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130. CrossRef
- Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 14, 129–177.
- Greenberg, J. (1986a). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 340–342. CrossRef
- Greenberg, J. (1986b). Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair? In M. H. Bazerman, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organisations (pp. 25–41). Greenwich: JAI.
- Hunton, J. E., Hall, T. W., & Price, K. H. (1998). The value of voice in participative decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 788–797. CrossRef
- Ismail, A., Mashkuri, A., Sulaiman, A., & Hock, W. (2011). Interactional justice as a mediator of the relationship between pay for performance and job satisfaction. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 213–235. CrossRef
- Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 2(3), 489–511. CrossRef
- Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21(4), 657–669. CrossRef
- Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6), 751–754. CrossRef
- Linna, A., Elovainio, M., Van den Bos, K., Kivimaki, M., Pentti, J., & Vahtera, J. (2012). Can usefulness of performance appraisal interviews change organizational justice perceptions? A 4-year longitudinal study among public sector employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(7), 1360–1375. CrossRef
- McSherry, R., & Pearce, P. (2002). Clinical governance: A guide to implementation for healthcare professionals. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Ministerial Task Force on Clinical Leadership. 2009. In good hands: Transforming clinical governance in New Zealand. http://www.aemh.org/pdf/InGoodHandsReport.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2011.
- Murphy, K., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational and goal-oriented perspectives. Newbury Park: Sage.
- Narcisse, S., & Harcourt, M. (2008). Employee fairness perceptions of performance appraisal: A Saint Lucian case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(6), 1152–1169. CrossRef
- National Health Board. 2010. Trends in service design and new models of care: A review. http://www.nationalhealthboard.govt.nz/sites/all/files/trends-service-design-new-models-care-jul2010.pdf Accessed 4 Mar 2011.
- Nieswiadomy, R. (2008). Foundations of nursing research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
- Nursing Council of New Zealand. 2010. Annual report. http://www.nursingcouncil.org.nz/index.cfm/1,48,0,0,html/Annual-Reports 20 Mar 2011.
- Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287. CrossRef
- Scally, G., & Donaldson, L. J. (1998). Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. British Medical Journal, 317(7150), 61–65. CrossRef
- Schermerhorn, J. (2009). Exploring management. New York: Wiley.
- Singh, R. (2009). Clinical governance in operation - everybody’s business: A proposed framework. Clinical Governance: An International Journal, 4, 189–197. CrossRef
- Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behaviour within a labour union: A test of organisational Justice Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 161–169. CrossRef
- Tang, T. L. P., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 61(3), 25–32.
- Taylor, M., Tracy, K., Renard, M., Harrison, J., & Carroll, S. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 495–523. CrossRef
- Thompson, P. H., & Dalton, G. W. (1970). Performance appraisal: Managers beware. Harvard Business Review, 48(1), 149–157.
- Thurston, P., & McNall, L. (2010). Justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(3), 201–228. CrossRef
- Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 95–104. CrossRef
- Vasset, F., Marnburg, E., & Furnes, T. (2010). Employees perceptions of justice in performance appraisals. Nursing Management, 17(2), 30–34. CrossRef
- Williams, J. R., & Levy, P. E. (2000). Investigating some neglected criteria: The influence of organizational level and perceived system knowledge on appraisal reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 501–513. CrossRef
- Wright, L., Barnett, P., & Hendry, C. (2001). Clinical leadership and clinical governance: A review of developments in New Zealand and internationally. Wellington: HIIRC.
- Zorn, T. E. (2000). Conducting thematic analyses of interviews and field notes, unpublished paper. Hamilton: Waikato University.
- Clinical Governance, Performance Appraisal and Interactional and Procedural Fairness at a New Zealand Public Hospital
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 117, Issue 3 , pp 667-678
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Clinical governance
- Performance appraisal
- Interactional justice
- Procedural justice
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
- 2. Department of Strategy & Human Resource Management, Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
- 3. Department of Human Resource Management, Middlesex Business School, Middlesex University, London, UK