Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 117, Issue 3, pp 553–558

The Ethical and Economic Case for Sweatshop Regulation

Authors

    • Department of GovernmentLondon School of Economics and Political Science
  • Michael Kates
    • Program in Political Philosophy, Policy, and LawUniversity of Virginia
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1540-y

Cite this article as:
Coakley, M. & Kates, M. J Bus Ethics (2013) 117: 553. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1540-y

Abstract

Three types of objections have been raised against sweatshops. According to their critics, sweatshops are (1) exploitative, (2) coercive, and (3) harmful to workers. In “The Ethical and Economic Case Against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment,” Powell and Zwolinski critique all three objections and thereby offer what is arguably the most powerful defense of sweatshops in the philosophical literature to date. This article demonstrates that, whether or not unregulated sweatshops are exploitative or coercive, they are, pace Powell and Zwolinski, harmful to workers.

Keywords

Sweatshops Minimum wage Labor law

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012