Abramovitz, M. (1956). Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. The American Economic Review,
Ackerman, J. (2002). Food: How altered? National Geographic,
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Akrich, M. (2000). The description of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in socio-technical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alcadipani, R., & Hassard, J. (2010). Actor-network theory, organizations and critique: Towards a politics of organizing. Organization,
Allhoff, F., & Lin, P. (2006). What’s so special about nanotechnology and nanoethics? International Journal of Applied Philosophy,
Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience,
Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., & Doubleday, R. (2007). Geographies of nano-technoscience. Area,
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2002). Markets for technology in the knowledge economy. International Social Science Journal,
Augenstein, L. (1967). Shall we play god. The Christian Century,
Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: A contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,
Banerjee, P. M., & Cole, B. M. (2010). Breadth-of-impact frontier: How firm-level decision and selection environment dynamics generate boundary-spanning inventions. Technovation, 30(July–August):411–419.
Banerjee, P. M. (2008). Leveraging existing technology: The role of alliances in cross-application. Strategic Management Review,
Baram, M. S. (1971). Social control of science and technology. Science,
Baslington, H. (1996). Anxiety overflow: Implications of the IVF surrogacy case and the ethical and moral limits of reproductive technologies in Britain. Women’s Studies International Forum,
Bauer, M. W. (2002). Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: A cultivation analysis. Public Understanding of Science,
Baum, J. A. C., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing,
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Free Press.
Berube, D. M., Cummings, C. L., Frith, J. H., Binder, A. R., & Oldendick, R. (2011). Comparing nanoparticle risk perception to other known EHS risks. Journal of Nanoparticle Research,
Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality,
Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2010). Reconsidering the reputation–performance relationship: A resource-based view. Journal of Management,
Brooks, M. E., Highhouse, S., Russell, S. S., & Mohr, D. C. (2003). Familiarity, ambivalence and firm reputation: Is corporate fame a double-edged sword? Journal of Applied Psychology,
Carolan, M. S. (2010). The mutability of biotechnology patents: From unwieldy products of nature to independent ‘object/S’. Theory, Culture & Society,
Casper, S. (2007). How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster. Research Policy,
Charki, M., Josserand, E., & Charki, N. (2011). Toward an ethical understanding of the controversial technology of online reverse auctions. Journal of Business Ethics,
Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). Explaining the attackers advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy,
Christian Coalition (2012). About us, Christian Coalition. Retrieved Feb 1, 2012. http://www.cc.org/about_us
Crang, M., Crang, P., & May, J. (1999). Virtual geographies: Bodies, space and relations
. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Crichton, M. (2002). Prey. New York: HarperCollins.
Dahlgren, P. (1988). What’s the meaning of this? Viewers plural sense-making of TV news. Media Culture & Society,
Davis, B. E. (1976). Mass media in missions. In G. P. Gurganus (Ed.), Guidelines for world evangelism. Abilene, TX: Biblical Research Press.
Deeds, D., Mang, P., & Frandsen, M. (2004). The influences of firms’ and industries’ legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. Strategic Organization,
Dougherty, D., & Dunne, D. D. (2011). Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organization Science,
Draper, J. W. (1881). History of the conflict between religion and science. New York: D. Appleton and Co.
Dudo, A., Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., Scheufele, D. A., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (2010). Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research,
Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1991). Coming to terms with the impact of communication on scientific and technological risk judgments. In L. Wilkins & P. Patterson (Eds.), Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy (pp. 11–30). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Elliasson, G. (1996). Firm objectives, controls and organization: The use of information and the transfer of knowledge with the firm
. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRef
Eurobarometer. (1996). Eurobarometer 46.1: Modern Biotechnology, Privacy on Computer Networks, and the Common European Currency, ICPSR, 6940 (October–November).
Falk, J. (1982). Global fission: The battle over nuclear power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Florida, R. L., & Kenney, M. (1988). Venture capital financed innovation and technological change in the USA. Research Policy,
Fox, E. (2009). The role of reader characteristics in processing and learning from informational text. Review of Educational Research,
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology,
Garud, R. (2008). Conferences as venues for the configuration of emerging organizational fields: The case of cochlear implants. Journal of Management Studies,
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Greene, M., Schill, K., Takahashi, S., Bateman-House, A., Beauchamp, T., Bok, H., et al. (2005). Moral issues of human-non-human primate neural grafting. Science,
Gregory, R., Flynn, J., & Slovic, P. (1995). Macroscope: Technological stigma. American Scientist,
Greil, A. (1989). The religious response to reproductive technology. The Christian Century,
Grodal, S., & Thoma, G. Cross-pollination in Science and Technology: Concept mobility in the nanobiotechnology field. Annals of Economics and Statistics (forthcoming).
Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left–right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry,
Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly,
Harshman, E. M., Gilsinan, J. F., Fisher, J. E., & Yeager, F. C. (2005). Professional ethics in a virtual world: The impact of the internet on traditional notions of professionalism. Journal of Business Ethics,
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica,
Horst, M. (2005). Cloning sensations: Mass mediated articulation of social responses to controversial biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science,
Howlett, M. (1998). Predictable and unpredictable policy windows: Institutional and exogenous correlates of Canadian federal agenda setting. Canadian Journal of Political Science-Revue,
Howson, A. (2001). Locating uncertainties in cervical screening. Health, Risk & Society,
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education,
Hwang, Y., & Southwell, B. G. (2009). Science TV news exposure predicts science beliefs: Real world effects among a national sample. Communication Research,
James, H. S, Jr. (2006). Trust in scientists and food manufacturers: Implications for the public support of biotechnology. Journal of Agribusiness,
Jones, O. D. (1992). Sex selection: Regulation technology enabling the predetermination of a child’s gender. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology,
Jones, J. W. (2000). Ethics of rapid surgical technological advancement. The Annuals of Thoracic Surgery,
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin,
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Kieser, A. (1994). Why organization theory needs historical analyses—and how this should be performed. Organization Science,
King, A., Lenox, M., & Barnett, M. (2002). Strategic responses to the reputation commons problem. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives (pp. 393–406). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kinney, J. (1995). Net worth?—religion, cyberspace and the future. Futures,
Kluger, J. (2010). 3-D Bioprinter. Time, Thursday, November 11.
Kong, L. (2001). Religion and technology: Refiguring place, space, identity and community. Area,
Kosmin, B. A., & Keysar, A. (2009). American religious identification survey (Aris 2008) summary report. Hartford, CT: Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society & Culture.
Lammers, S. E. (2002). Playing god? Human genetic engineering and the rationalization of public bioethical debate. The Christian Century,
Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management,
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lee, T. S. (1999). Technology and the production of Islamic space: The call to prayer in Singapore. Ethnomusicology,
Leiponen, A. (2005). Skills and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization,
Lester, M. (1980). Generating newsworthiness: The interpretive construction of public events. American Sociological Review,
Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Scientific communication and cognitive codification: Social systems theory and the sociology of scientific knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory,
Lima, M. L., Barnett, J., & Vala, J. (2005). Risk perception and technological development at a societal level. Risk Analysis,
Luhmann, N. (1990). Die Wissenschaft Der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.
Lynn, L. H., Reddy, N. M., & Aram, J. D. (1996). Linking technology and institutions: The innovation community framework. Research Policy,
Manicas, P. (1987). A history and philosophy of the social sciences. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Mann, R. J., & Sager, T. W. (2007). Patents, venture capital, and software start-ups. Research Policy,
Marks, L. A., Kalaitzandonakes, N., Wilkins, L., & Zakharova, L. (2007). Mass media framing of biotechnology news. Public Understanding of Science,
Marshall, K. P. (1999). Has technology introduced new ethical problems? Journal of Business Ethics,
Martin, K. E., & Freeman, R. E. (2004). The separation of technology and ethics in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics,
Marx, G. T. (2005). Seeing hazily, but not darkly, through the lens: Some recent empirical studies of surveillance technologies. Law and Social Inquiry,
Mathews, D. J. H., Sugarman, J., Bok, H., Blass, D. M., Coyle, J. T., Duggan, P., et al. (2008). Cell-based interventions for neurologic conditions: Ethical challenges for early human trials. Neurology,
Mathieu, J. E., & Chen, G. (2011). The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management,
McArthur, J. W., & Sachs, J. D. (2001). The growth competitive index: Measuring technological advancement and the stages of development, Global Competitiveness Report. Center for International Development, Cambridge, MA.
Miller, J. D. (2000). United States biotechnology study, 1997–1998 [Computer File]. ICPSR Version. Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], Ann Arbor, MI, Market Facts, Inc. [producer], Downer’s Grove, IL.
Mohnen, P., & Röller, L.-H. (2005). Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review,
Moor, J. H. (1979). Are there decisions computers should never make? Nature and System,
Moor, J. H. (2006). The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. IEEE Intelligent Systems,
Nelson, J. R. (1983). Genetic science: A menacing marvel. The Christian Century,
Nisbet, M. C., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication,
Norenzayan, A., & Lee, A. (2010). It was meant to happen: Explaining cultural variations in fate attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
O’Connell, C. J., & Mills, A. J. (2003). Making sense of bad news: The media, sensemaking, and organizational crisis. Canadian Journal of Communication,
Okunoye, A., & Bertaux, N. (2008). Addressing contextual issues in knowledge management: A guiding framework. In M. E. Jennex (Ed.), Current issues in knowledge management
(pp. 12–33). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).CrossRef
Pearcey, N., & Thaxton, C. B. (1994). The soul of science: Christian faith and natural philosophy. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.
Peto, J., Gilham, C., Fletcher, O., & Matthews, F. E. (2004). The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. The Lancet,
Pfarrer, M. D., Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2010). A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors reactions. Academy of Management Journal,
Powell, W. W. (1999). The social construction of an organizational field: The case of biotechnology. International Journal of Biotechnology,
Rabinow, P. (1996). Making PCR: A story of biotechnology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry, 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal,
Richards, J. (2011). Why Black students struggle with science. Retrieved Dec 27, 2011. http://www.thegrio.com/education-1/why-black-college-students-struggle-with-science.php
Riebsame, W. E., Diaz, H. F., Moses, T., & Price, M. (1986). The social burden of weather and climate hazards. Bulletin American Meteorological Society, 67(11), 1378–1388.
Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal,
Roco, M., & Bainbridge, W. (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology
, National Science Foundation Special Report. Retrieved 6/11/12, from http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications/nanosi.pdf
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy,
Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & Fincher, K. (2009). From oral to moral. Science,
(27 Feb), 1179–1180.CrossRef
Russell, C. A. (1985). Cross-currents: Interactions between science and faith. Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press.
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Sine, W., & Lee, B. H. (2009). Titling at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly,
Sonenshein, S. (2007). The Role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review,
Southwell, B. G., & Torres, A. (2006). Connecting interpersonal and mass communication: Science news exposure, perceived ability to understand science, and conversation. Communication Monographs,
Steinke, J. (1995). Reaching readers: Assessing readers impressions of science news. Science Communication,
Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C. (1993). Information systems research thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987–1992. Information Systems Research,
Taylor, S. R., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin,
Tenner, E. (1997). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Vintage.
Thompson, P. B. (2001). Social acceptance of nanotechnology. In M. C. Roco, & W. S. Bainbridge (Eds.), Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. National Science Foundation, NSET Workshop Report, Arlington, VA.
Titmuss, R. M. (1971). The gift relationship. New York: Vintage Press.
Turban, D. B., Lau, C., Ngo, H., Chow, I. H. S., & Si, S. X. (2001). Organizational attractiveness of firms in the People’s Republic of China: A person-organization fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology,
von Burg, U., & Kenney, M. (2000). Venture capital and the birth of the local area networking industry. Research Policy,
Wade, S., & Schramm, W. (1969). The mass media as sources of public affairs, science and health knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly,
Washington, M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2008). Institutional contradictions and struggles in the formation of US collegiate basketball, 1880–1938. Journal of Sport Management,
Whitfield, J. (2003). Obituary: Dolly the sheep. Nature. Retrieved Feb 18, 2003.
Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy,
Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present and future of a core construct. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE.
Zaleski, J. (1997). The soul of cyberspace: How new technology is changing our spiritual lives. San Francisco: Harper.
Zelizer, V. A. (1978). Human values and the market: The case of life insurance and death in 19th-century America. American Journal of Sociology,
Zelizer, V. A. (1979). Morals and markets: The development of life insurance in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.