Abstract
This study examines whether and how female board directors may affect corporate social performance (CSP) by drawing on social role theory and feminist ethics literature. The empirical analysis, based on a sample of 126 firms drawn from the S&P500 group of companies over a 5-year period, suggests that board gender diversity (BGD) significantly affects CSP. However, this impact depends on the social performance metric under investigation. In particular, more gender diverse boards exert stronger influence on CSP metrics focusing on ‘negative’ business practices, such as the ‘concerns’ dimension of the Kinder Lydenberg Domini, Inc. (KLD) ratings. This is because such CSP ratings have the potential to induce higher levels of ‘empathic caring’, which strongly appeals to female directors. Hence, this study reveals further hidden connections in the BGD–CSP link which have important implications for managers, nongovernmental organisations and socially responsible investors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Fowler and Hope (2007) for a more detailed analysis and a list of indices focusing on positive/negative screening.
Abbreviations
- BGD:
-
Board gender diversity
- CSP:
-
Corporate social performance
- CSR:
-
Corporate social responsibility
- DJSI:
-
Dow Jones sustainability index
- GMM:
-
Generalised method of moments
- IV:
-
Instrumental variable
- KLD:
-
Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini & Co., Inc
- NGO:
-
Non-governmental organisation
- SAM:
-
Sustainable asset management
- SEM:
-
Structural equations modelling
- S&P:
-
Standard and poor’s
- SRI:
-
Socially responsible investment
References
Agars, M. D. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 103–111.
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOS? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotion and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58, 56–70.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Boston: Beacon Press.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 282–315). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.
Bernardi, R. A., Bosco, S. M., & Vassill, K. M. (2006). Does female representation on boards of directors associate with fortune’s 100 ‘best companies’ list? Business and Society, 45, 235–248.
Bernardi, R. A., Bosco, S. M., & Columb, V. L. (2009). Does female representation on boards of directors associate with the ‘most ethical companies’ list? Corporate Reputation Review, 12, 270–280.
Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business for women directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bilimoria, D., & Piderit, S. K. (1994). Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1453–1477.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321–340.
Burges, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 39–49.
Case, S. S. (1993). The collaborative advantage: The usefulness of women’s language to contemporary business problems. Business in the Contemporary World, 5(3), 81–105.
Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169.
Crisp, R. (2003). Equality, priority and compassion. Ethics, 113, 745–763.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701–718.
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 371–382.
Dobbins, G. (1985). Effects of gender on leaders’ responses to poor performance: An attributional interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 587–598.
Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644–658.
Eagly, A., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.
Eagly, A., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591.
Eisenberg, N. And., & Miller, P. A. (1987). Empathy and prosocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.
Fondas, N. (1997). Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings. Academy of Management Review, 22, 257–282.
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505.
Forte, A. (2004). Antecedents of managers moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(4), 315–347.
Fowler, S. J., & Hope, C. (2007). A critical review of sustainable business indices and their impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 243–252.
Fox, M., Gibbs, M., & Auerbach, D. (1985). Age and gender dimensions of friendship. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 59–68.
Frankfurt, H. (1988). The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1991). Making corporate actors accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis–St. Paul. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gond, J. P., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm? Business and Society, 49(4), 677–703.
Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–1046.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business and Society, 36, 5–31.
Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex ratios, sex-role spillover and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.
Halaby, C. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507–544.
Hansen, L. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(3), 1029–1054.
Hanson, R., & Mullis, R. L. (1985). Age and gender differences in empathy and moral reasoning among adolescents. Child Study Journal, 15, 181–188.
Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. 2009. The global gender gap report. World Economic Forum, Geneva.
Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441.
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427.
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care. In D. Cope (Ed.), The oxford handbook of ethical theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Board of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. (2002). Women and racial minorities in boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28, 747–763.
Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Developmental synthesis of affect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation. Developmental Psychology, 11(5), 607–622.
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huse, M., Nielsen, S. T., & Hagen, I. M. (2009). Women and employee-elected board members, and their contributions to board control tasks. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 581–597.
Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10, 35–43.
Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1995). The corporate social responsiveness of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 405–410.
Ibrahim, N. A., Angelidis, J. P., & Tomic, I. M. (2010). Managers’ attitudes toward codes of ethics: Are there gender differences? Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 343–353.
Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.
Kakabadse, A. (2007). Being responsible: Boards are re-examining the bottom line. Leadership in Action, 27(1), 3–6.
Kesner, I. F., Victor, B., & LaMont, B. (1986). Board composition and the commission of illegal acts: An investigation of fortune 500 companies. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 789–799.
Klineberg, S., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it is measured. Social Science Quarterly, 79(4), 734–753.
Konrad, A. M., & Kramer, V. W. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84, 12–22.
Lamsa, A.-M., Sakkinen, A., & Turjanmaa, P. (2000). Values and their change during the business education—A gender perspective. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 13(3), 203–213.
Leblanc, R., & Gillies, J. (2005). Inside the boardroom: How boards really work and the coming revolution in corporate governance. Hoboken: Wiley.
Lee, M. (2002). Panel data econometrics: Methods of moments and limited dependent variables. San Diego: Academic Press.
Lopez, M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profit: The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.
Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.
Noddings, N. (2002). Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards’ of directors composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50(1), 189–223.
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to ‘difference’ and ‘system’ GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
Rosener, J. B. (1990). Way women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68, 119–125.
Rosener, J. B. (1995). America’s competitive secret: Utilizing women as management strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society, 39(4), 397–418.
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549–572.
Sargan, J. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393–415.
Schein, V. E., Muller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager-think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 17, 33–41.
Selby, C. C. (2000). From male locker room to co-ed board room: A twenty-five year perspective. In R. Burke & M. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355–373.
Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1313–1320.
Siciliano, J. I. (2005). Board involvement in strategy and organisational performance. Journal of General Management, 30(4), 1–10.
Simerly, R. L. (2003). An empirical examination of the relationship between management and corporate social performance. International Journal of Management, 20, 353–359.
Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ. European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.
Sinha, A. K., & Jain, A. (1986). The effects of benefactor and beneficiary characteristics on helping behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 126(3), 361–368.
Slote, M. (2007). The ethics of care and empathy. New York: Routledge.
Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The determinants of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. American Business Review, 16(1), 86–93.
Sturmer, S., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2005). Prosocial emotions and helping: The moderating role of group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 532–546.
Swanson, D. L. (1999). Towards and integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 506–521.
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Val Singh, (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.
The Economist (2008). A special report on corporate social responsibility: Just good business, January, 19.
Ullmann, A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540–577.
Van der Laan, G., Van Ees, H., & Witteloostuijn, A. V. (2008). Corporate social and financial performance: An extended stakeholder theory, and empirical test with accounting measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 299–310.
Van Oosterhout, J., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2006). Much ado about nothing: A conceptual critique of CSR. Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
Vinnicombe, Singh, S. V., Burke, R. J., Bilimoria, D., & Huse, M. (Eds.). (2008). Women on corporate boards of directors: International research and practice. London: Elgar.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, A. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.
Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 771–778.
Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 1–10.
Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 25–51.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109–125). New York: Guilford Press.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zahra, S. A., & Stanton, W. W. (1988). The implications of board of directors composition for corporate strategy and value. International Journal of Management, 5(2), 229–236.
Zelechowski, S. A., & Bilimoria, D. (2006). Characteristics of CEOs and boards with women inside directors. Corporate Board: Roles, Duties and Composition, 2(2), 14–21.
Zyglidopoulos, S., & Georgiadis, A. 2006. Media visibility as a driver of corporate social performance, Cambridge judge business school working papers, No. 16/2006. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Acknowledgments
I wish to express my gratitude to the Editors and anonymous Reviewers of the Journal of Business Ethics for their most constructive comments. I also wish to thank Prof. M. Kilduff, Dr. E. Yin, Dr. S. Zyglidopoulos, Prof. R. Sugden and Dr. C. Pitelis for their encouragement in the realisation of this study and their useful criticism at an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boulouta, I. Hidden Connections: The Link Between Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Social Performance. J Bus Ethics 113, 185–197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1293-7