Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives,
(4), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragon-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal,
, 556–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Baker, W., & Sinkula, J. (2005). Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 461–475.
*Bansel, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic management journal, 26, 197–218.
*Bansel, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 93–103.
*Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.
*Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate response to institutional pressures: Do family controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 82–113.
*Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. A. T. (1972). Is pollution profitable? Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.
Bucholz, R. A. (1993). Principles of environmental management: The greening of business
. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal,
, 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review,
, 497–505.Google Scholar
Chen, M., & Hambrick, D. (1995). Speed, stealth and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal,
(2), 453–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 895–907.
*Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost competitiveness: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review,
, 92–117.Google Scholar
*Clarkson, P., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2004). The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. Accounting Review, 79, 329–353.
*Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 33(4/5), 303–327.
*Clemons, B. (2006). Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green? Journal of Business Research, 59, 492–500.
*Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 827–840.
*Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. M. (2001). An examination of social environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 14: 587–616.
D’Amboise, G., & Muldowney, M. (1988). Management theory for small business: Attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review,
, 226–240.Google Scholar
Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Bamford, C. E. (1998). Differences in large and small firms responses to environmental context: strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal,
, 709–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Dooley, R. S., & Lerner, L. D. (1994). Pollution, profits, and stakeholders: The constraining effect of economic performance on CEO concern with stakeholder expectations. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 701–711.
*Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46, 1059–1074.
Eden, L., Levitas, E., & Martinez, R. J. (1997). The production, transfer and spillover of technology: Comparing large and small, multinationals as technology producers. Small Business Economics,
, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engardio, P., Capell, K., Carey, J., & Hall, K. (2007). Beyond the green corporation
. Jan: Business Week. 29.Google Scholar
Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management,
, 637–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiegenbaum, A., & Karnani, A. (1991). Output flexibility: A competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal,
, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Fogler, H. R., & Nutt, F. (1975). A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 155–160.
*Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1986). An analysis of the impact of corporate pollution disclosures included in annual financial statements on investors’ decisions. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 193–212.
Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1994). Analysis of the association between pollution performance and input cost factors: The case of electric utility plants. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,
(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R., & Evan, W. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics,
(4), 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1970, September). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 33.
*Gilley, K. M., Worrell, D. L., & El-Jelly, A. (2000). Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: The differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of Management, 26, 1199–1216.
Greer, J., & Bruno, K. (1996). Greenwash: The reality behind corporate environmentalism
. New York: Apex Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society,
(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review,
, 996–1014.Google Scholar
Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal,
, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. (2001). From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism
. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, G. S. (1994). Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? Journal of Organizational Behavior,
, 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, C. B., & Auster, E. R. (1990). Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review,
(2), 7–18.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings
. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
*Ingram, R. (1978). An investigation of the information content of (certain) social responsibility disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 16, 270–285.
Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature,
(1), 132–163.Google Scholar
*Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.
*Judge, W., & Elenkov, D. (2005). Organizational capacity for change and environmental performance: an empirical assessment of Bulgarian firms. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 893–901.
*Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating environmental issues into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment, Journal of Management Studies, 35, 241–62.
*King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48, 289–299.
*Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42, 1199–1214.
*Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599–615.
*Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 281–289.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research methods series
(Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
*Magness, V. (2006). Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19, 540–563.
*Majumdar, S. K., & Marcus, A. A. (2001). Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 170–179.
*Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics 89(3), 409–422.
Marcus, A., & Geffen, D. (1998). The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation. Strategic Management Journal,
(12), 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Marcus, A. A., & Goodman, R. S. (1986). Compliance and performance: Toward a contingency theory. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 8, 193–221.
*Menguc, B., & Ozanne, L. (2005). Challenges of the green imperative: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430–438.
*Melnyk, S. A., Stroufe, R. P., & Calatone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 329–351.
Nehrt, C. (1996). Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal,
(7), 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A virtuous circle revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(2), 197–209.
Okada, K., & Sawai, M. (Eds.). (1999). Small firms, large concerns
(p. 314). Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies,
(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics,
, 157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquero, J. (1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
(1), 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environmental-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective,
(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management systems. Business Strategy and the Environment,
, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockness, Schlachter, J., & Rockness, H. O. (1986). Hazardous waste disposal, corporate disclosure, and financial performance in the chemical industry. Advances in Public Interest Accounting,
, 167–191.Google Scholar
*Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.
Schmitt, N. (1994). Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports. American Psychologist,
, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Shane, P. B., & Spicer, B. H. (1983). Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. The Accounting Review, 58, 521–538.
Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal,
, 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. (2001). Different strokes: Regulatory styles and environmental strategy in the North American oil and gas industry. Business Strategy and the Environment,
, 344–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., & Starik, M. (Eds.). (2002). Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment
. Northampton: Edward Elgar Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,
, 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review,
(4), 936–961.Google Scholar
*Slater, D. J., & Dixon-Fowler, H. R. (2009). CEO international assignment experience and corporate social performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 473–489.
Spaeder, K. E. (2006, March). Think green: Entrepreneurs are turning environmental problems into opportunities. Entrepreneur Magazine
. Retrieved January 3, 2008. http://www.entrepreneur.com/magazine/entrepreneur/2006/march/83592.html
Spector, P. E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
, 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Spicer, B. (1978). Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 53(1), 94–111.
Starik, M., & Marcus, A. A. (2000). Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environmental. Academy of Management Journal,
(4), 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the small business sector
. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tozzi, J. (2008, October and 31) Why small manufacturers are going green. Business Week.
Trochim, W. (2001). The research methods knowledge base
(2nd ed.). Cincinnati: Automatic Dog Publishing.Google Scholar
*Turban, D., & Greening, D. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.
Ullman, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review,
, 540–557.Google Scholar
Wagner, (2007). Integration of environmental management with other managerial functions of the firm. Long Range Planning,
, 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review,
(3), 46–52.Google Scholar
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review,
, 758–769.Google Scholar
Welsh, J., & White, J. (1981). A small business is not a little big business. Harvard Business Review,
(4), 18–27.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. B., & Lipsey, M. W. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research methods series, vol 49. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Woo, C. Y. Y., & Cooper, A. C. (1981). Strategies of effective low share businesses. Strategic Management Journal,
, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T. (2001). Toward a capabilities perspective of the small firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 185–197.
*Yu, V., Ting, H. I., & Wu, Y. C. J. (2009). Assessing the greenness for European firms: A resource efficiency perspective. Management Decision,
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2007). Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Environmental Management,
, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar