Date: 31 Mar 2012
Diminished or Just Different? A Factorial Vignette Study of Privacy as a Social Contract
- Kirsten E. Martin
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A growing body of theory has focused on privacy as being contextually defined, where individuals have highly particularized judgments about the appropriateness of what, why, how, and to whom information flows within a specific context. Such a social contract understanding of privacy could produce more practical guidance for organizations and managers who have employees, users, and future customers all with possibly different conceptions of privacy across contexts. However, this theoretical suggestion, while intuitively appealing, has not been empirically examined. This study validates a social contract approach to privacy by examining whether and how privacy norms vary across communities and contractors. The findings from this theoretical examination support the use of contractual business ethics to understand privacy in research and in practice. As predicted, insiders to a community had significantly different understandings of privacy norms as compared to outsiders. In addition, all respondents held different privacy norms across hypothetical contexts, thereby suggesting privacy norms are contextually understood within a particular community of individuals. The findings support two conclusions. First, individuals hold different privacy norms without necessarily having diminished expectations of privacy. Individuals differed on the factors they considered important in calculating privacy expectations, yet all groups had robust privacy expectations across contexts. Second, outsiders have difficulty in understanding the privacy norms of a particular community. For managers and scholars, this renders privacy expectations more difficult to identify at a distance or in deductive research. The findings speak directly to the needs of organizations to manage a diverse set of privacy issues across stakeholder groups.
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Privacy enhancing technology (pp. 36–58).
Alder, G. S., Schminke, M., & Noel, T. W. (2007). The impact of individual ethics on reactions to potentially invasive HR practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(2), 201–214.CrossRef
Allen, A. L. (1999). Coercing privacy. William and Mary Law Review, 40, 723.
Angst, C. M., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion, MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 339–370.
Appelbaum, L. D., Lennon, M. C., & Aber, J. L. (2006). When effort is threatening: the influence of the belief in a just world on Americans’ attitudes toward antipoverty policy. Political Psychology, 27(3), 387–402.CrossRef
Ashworth, L., & Free, C. (2006). Marketing dataveillance and digital privacy: Using theories of justice to understand consumers’ online privacy concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 107–123.CrossRef
Awad, N. F., & Krishman, M. S. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13–28.
Bailey, W., & Spicer, A. (2007). When does National Identity Matter? Convergence and divergence in international business ethics. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6).
Beales, H. J., & Muris, T. J. (2008). Choice or consequences: Protecting privacy in commercial information. The University of Chicago Law Review, 75(1), 109–135.
Bennett, C. (1992). Regulating privacy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Borna, S., & Avila, S. (1999). Genetic information: Consumers’ right to privacy versus insurance companies’ right to know a public opinion survey. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(4), 355–362.CrossRef
Brenkert, G. (1981). Privacy, polygraphs, and work. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1, 23.
Charters, D. (2002). Electronic monitoring and privacy issues in business-marketing: The ethics of the doubleclick experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 243–254.CrossRef
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.CrossRef
Culnan, M. J. (1993). How did they get my name? An exploratory investigation of computer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quarterly, 17, 341–364.CrossRef
Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115.CrossRef
Culnan, M. J., & Bies, R. J. (2003). Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 323–342.CrossRef
Culnan, M. J., & Williams, C. C. (2009). How ethics can enhance organizational privacy: Lessons from the choicepoint and tjx data breaches. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 673–687.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (2002). Ties that bind in business ethics: Social contracts and why they matter. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(9), 1853–1865.CrossRef
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contract approach to business ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Dunfee, T. W. (2006). A critical perspective of integrative social contracts theory: Recurring criticisms and next generation research topics. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 303–328.CrossRef
Elgesem, D. (1999). The structure of rights in Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(4), 283–293.CrossRef
Floridi, L. (2006). Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(3), 109–119.CrossRef
Fried, C. (1984). Privacy. In F. D. Schoeman (Ed.), Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (2006). Multiple segment factorial vignette designs. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 455–468.CrossRef
Glac, K., & Kim, T. W. (2009). The “I” in ISCT: Normative and empirical facets of integration. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 693–705.CrossRef
Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., van Oosterhout, J., & Kaptein, S. P. (2006). Foundations and applications for contractualist business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 211–228.CrossRef
Husted, B. W. (1999). A critique of the empirical methods of integrative social contracts theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 227–235.CrossRef
Jasso, G. (1990). Factorial survey methods for studying beliefs and judgments. Sociology Methods and Research, 34(3), 334–423.CrossRef
Jasso, G. (2006). Factorial survey methods for studying beliefs and judgments. Sociological Methods and Research, 34(3), 334–423.CrossRef
Jasso, G., & Opp, K. (1997). Probing the character of norms: A factorial survey analysis of the norms of political action. American Sociological Review, 62, 947–964.CrossRef
Jiang, X., Hong, J. L., & Landay, J. A. (2002). Approximate information flows: Socially based modeling of privacy in Ubiquitous Computing, Ubicomp 2002: ubiquitous computing (pp. 176–193).
Johnson, D. (2001). Computer ethics (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Johnson, D. (2004). Computer ethics. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information (pp. 64–75). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Katz, N., & Koenig, G. (2001). Sports teams as a model for workplace teams: Lessons and liabilities. Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 56–69.CrossRef
Kennedy, P. (2003). A guide to econometrics (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuo, F., Lin, C., & Hsu, M. (2007). Assessing gender differences in computer professionals’ self-regulatory efficacy concerning information privacy practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(2), 145–160.CrossRef
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174.CrossRef
Lynch, J. (1982). The concept of external validity. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 240–244.CrossRef
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355.CrossRef
Martin, K. (2010). Privacy revisited: From Lady Godiva’s Peeping Tom to Facebook’s Beacon Program. In D. E. Palmer (Ed.), Ethical issues in e-business: Models and frameworks. IGI Global: Hershey.
Martin, K., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). Some problems with employee monitoring. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 353–361.CrossRef
Milberg, S. J., Smith, H. J., & Burke, S. J. (2000). Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation. Organization Science, 11(1), 35–57.CrossRef
Miller, S., & Weckert, J. (2000). Privacy, the workplace and the Internet. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 255–265.CrossRef
Moor, J. (1997). Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. Computers and Society, 27, 27–32.CrossRef
Mossholder, K. W., Giles, W. F., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1991). Information privacy and performance appraisal: An examination of employee perceptions and reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(2), 151–156.CrossRef
Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119–158.
Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nock, S., & Gutterbock, T. M. (2010). Survey experiments. In J. Wright & P. Marsden (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
O’Connell, A. A. (2006). Logistic regression models for ordinal response variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Oz, E. (2001). Organizational commitment and ethical behavior: An empirical study of information system professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 137–142.CrossRef
Pavlau, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 105–136.
Persson, A. J., & Hansson, S. O. (2003). Privacy at work—ethical criteria. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 59–70.CrossRef
Peslak, A. R. (2005). An ethical exploration of privacy and radio frequency identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 327–345.CrossRef
Phillips, R. A., & Johnson-Cramer, M. E. (2006). Ties that unwind: Dynamism in integrative social contracts theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(3), 283–302.CrossRef
Pollach, I. (2005). A typology of communicative strategies in online privacy policies: Ethics, power and informed consent. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 221–235.CrossRef
Rachels, J. (1975). Why is privacy important? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 4(4), 323–333.
Robertson, D. C., & Ross, W. T. (1995). Decision-making processes on ethical issues: the impact of a social contract perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(2), 213–240.CrossRef
Rosen, J. (2010). The Web means the end of forgetting. The New York Times, July 21, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/magazine/25privacy-t2.html?pagewanted=all.
Rossi, P., & Nock, S. (Eds.). (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Schoeman, F. (Ed.). (1984). Privacy: Philosophical dimensions of the literature. In Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, T. R. (2003). The moral intensity of privacy: An empirical study of Webmaster’ attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(4), 301–318.CrossRef
Singleton, S. (1998). Privacy as censorship. Cato Institute: Policy Analysis, 295, 1–32.
Smith, H. J. (2004). Information privacy and its management. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3(4), 291–313.
Smith, J. H., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review, MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989–1015.
Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167–196.CrossRef
Smith, N. C., Simpson, S. S., & Huang, C. (2007). Why managers fail to do the right thing: An empirical study of unethical and illegal conduct. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 633–667.CrossRef
Smith, W. P., & Tabak, F. (2009). Monitoring employee e-mails: Is there any room for privacy? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 33–48.CrossRef
Solove, D. J. (2006). A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(3), 477.CrossRef
Son, J. Y., & Kim, S. S. (2008). Internet users’ information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 503–529.
Soule, E. (2002). Managerial moral strategies—in search of a few good principles. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 114–124.
Spicer, A., Dunfee, T. W., & Bailey, W. J. (2004). Does national context matter in ethical decision making? An empirical test of integrated social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 47(4), 610–620.CrossRef
Straub, D. W., & Collins, R. W. (1990). Key information liability issues facing managers: Software piracy, proprietary databases, and individual rights to privacy. MIS Quarterly, 14(2), 143–156.CrossRef
Strong, K. C., & Ringer, R. C. (2000). An examination of integrative social contracts theory: Social hypernorms and authentic community norms in corporate drug testing programs. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12(4), 237–247.CrossRef
Tavani, H. T. (2008). Floridi’s ontological theory of informational privacy: Some implications and challenges. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2/3), 155–166.CrossRef
Taylor, B. J. (2006). Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgment. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 1187–1207.CrossRef
Thompson, J. A., & Hart, D. W. (2006). Psychological contracts: A nano-level perspective on social contract theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 229–241.CrossRef
Thurman, Q. C., Lam, J. A., & Rossi, P. H. (1988). Sorting out the cuckoo’s nest: A factorial survey approach to the study of popular conceptions of mental illness. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(4), 565–588.CrossRef
Van de Hoven, J. (2008). Information technology, privacy, and the protection of personal data. In J. Weckert & J. Van de Hoven (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy (pp. 301–321). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Oosterhout, J., Heugens, P., & Kaptein, M. (2006). The internal morality of contracting: Advancing the contractualist endeavor in business ethics. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 521–539.CrossRef
Wallander, L. (2009). 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research, 38, 505–520.CrossRef
Walzer, M. (2006). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.CrossRef
Weber, J. (1992). Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(2), 137–160.CrossRef
Wempe, B. (2005). In defense of a self-disciplined, domain-specific social contract theory of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 113–135.CrossRef
Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Winter, S. J., Stylianou, A. C., & Giacalone, R. A. (2004). Individual differences in the acceptability of unethical information technology practices: The case of Machiavellianism and ethical ideology. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(3), 275–296.CrossRef
- Diminished or Just Different? A Factorial Vignette Study of Privacy as a Social Contract
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 111, Issue 4 , pp 519-539
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Social contract theory
- Contractual business ethics
- Factorial vignette methodology
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Catholic University of America, 309 McMahon Hall, 620 Michigan Ave NE, Washington, DC, 20064, USA