Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review,
, 17–40.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1925). The Nicomachean Ethics (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle. (1981). The Politics (T. A. Sinclair & T. J. Saunders, Trans.). London: Penguin.
Barnard, C. (1968/1938). The Functions of the Executive. Introduction of K. Andrews London: Oxford University Press.
Brenkert, G. G. (1992). Freedom, participation and corporations: The issue of corporate (economic) democracy. Business Ethics Quarterly,
(3), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. M. (1979). Leadership
. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Buttiglione, R. (1997). Karol Wojtyla: The thought of the man who became Pope John Paul II (Foreword by M. Novak. P. Guietti & F. Murphy, Trans.). Grand Rapids, MI: WmB Eerdmans Publishers.
Castro, B. (1999). Faust and the ethos of business: A report from Grand Rapids, Ciudad Juarez, and Muskegon. Journal of Business Ethics,
(2), 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review,
, 92–117.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica
4, 386–405 (Reprinted in The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution, and development: 1961–1974, by O. E. Williamson & S. G. Winter, Eds., 1991, New York: Oxford University Press).
Coase, R. H. (1991a). The nature of the firm: Meaning. In O. E. Williamson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature of the firm: Origins evolution and development
(pp. 48–60). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1991b). The nature of the firm: Influence. In O. E. Williamson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature of the firm: Origins evolution and development
(pp. 61–74). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, J. F. (1996). The selfhood of the human person
. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2002). Damned by our own theories: Contradictions between theories and management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
, 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review,
(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (2001). The monochrome society
. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business
(3rd ed., pp. 145–154). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ferrer, U. (2002). Qué significa ser persona?
. Madrid: Palabra.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights
. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. (1940). Dynamic administration. The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, ed. by H. C. Metcalf y L. Urwick. New York, London: Harper & Brothers.
Fort, T. L. (1996). Business as mediating institutions. Business Ethics Quarterly,
(2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fort, T. (2000). On social psychology, business ethics, and corporate governance. Business Ethics Quarterly,
(3), 725–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1997). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business
(5th ed., pp. 66–76). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2000). Business ethics at the Millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly,
(1), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (1991). Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach. Business Horizons,
(4), 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittell, J. H. (2003). The Southwest Airlines Way: Using the power of relationships to achieve high performance
. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hartman, E. M. (1994). The commons and the moral organization. Business Ethics Quarterly,
(3), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessen, R. (1979). In defense of the corporation
. Stanford University Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Hillery, G. A., Jr. (1955). Definitions of community—areas of agreement. Rural Sociology,
(4), 111–123.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics,
, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John Paul II. (1991). Letter-Encyclical ‘Centesimus annus’ (May 1). http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0214/_INDEX.HTM
. Accessed June 29, 2010.
Keeley, M. (1995). Continuing the social contract tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly,
(2), 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehn, D. (1995). A role for virtue ethics in the analysis of business practice. Business Ethics Quarterly,
(3), 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science,
, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1995). Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: A reply. Journal of International Business Studies,
, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance
. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lawler, E., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology,
(1), 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leana, C. R., & Van Buren III, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review,
(3), 538–555.Google Scholar
MacIntryre, A. (1984/1981). After virtue. A study in moral theory (2nd ed.) Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics,
(44), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics,
(1), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melé, D. (2010). The practice of networking: An ethical approach. Journal of Business Ethics,
(4), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melé, D., & Rosanas, J. M. (2003). Power, freedom and authority in management: Mary Parket Follett’s ‘Power-with’. Philosophy of Management,
(2), 35–46.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M. (1998). Social categories and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly Special Issue. The Ruffin Series (1), 149–172.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application
. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review,
(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome
. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge
. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G., & Jaeger, A. M. (1978). Type Z organization: Stability in the midst of mobility. Academy of Management Review,
(2), 305–314.Google Scholar
PCJP (Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace). (2004). Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church
(Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Città del Vaticano). http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html
. Accessed September 3.
Pfeffer, J. (2005). Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Goshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
(1), 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (2006). Working alone: What ever happened to the idea of organizations as communities? In J. O’Toole & E. E. Lawler III (Eds.), America at work: Choices and challenges. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2–21.
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
, 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, C. (2001). Antecedents of organizational identification in multinational corporations: Fostering psychological attachment to the local subsidiary and the global organization. Human Resource Management,
(8), 1269–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs
. Cambridge: Perseus.Google Scholar
Riketta, M., & Landerer, A. (2005). Does perceived threat to organizational status moderate the relation between organizational commitment and work behavior? International Journal of Management,
(2), 193–200.Google Scholar
Rocha, H. O., & Ghoshal, S. (2006). Beyond self-interest revisited. Journal of Management Studies,
(3), 585–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. (1973). The economy theory of the agency: the principal’s problem. American Economic Review,
, 134–139.Google Scholar
Rotondi, T., Jr. (1975). Organizational identification: Issues and implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,
, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, A. (1995). Company man: The rise and fall of the corporate life
. New York: Times Business.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1997). Corporate culture and leadership
(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. (1992). Ethics and excellence. Cooperation and integrity in business
. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. (1994). The corporation as community. A reply to Ed Hartmann. Business Ethics Quarterly,
, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R. (2000). Historicism, communitarianism, and commerce: An Aristotelian Approach to Business Ethics. In P. Koslowski (Ed.), Contemporary economic ethics and business ethics. Berlin: Springer, pp. 117–147.
Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies,
(6), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaemann, R. (2006). Persons: The difference between ‘someone’ and ‘something’ (O. O’Donovan, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stein, E. (1989). On the problem of empathy (W. Stein, Trans.). Washington, DC: ICS Publications.
Stein, E. (1998). La estructura de la persona humana (first published in German as ‘Der aufbau der menschlichenperson’, 1994) (BAC Madrid).
Tönnies, F. (2001/1887). Community and civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wojtyla, K. (1979). The acting person. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel (Translated from Polish by Andrzej Potocki and edited by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka. Originally published in 1969).
Wojtyla, K. (1981). Love and responsibility (first published in Polish, Miłość i Odpowiedzialnosc. Studium etyczne. Lublin: KUL, 1960). San Francisco: Harper-Collins.
Wojtyla, K. (1993). Person and community. Selected essays (O. Theresa Sandok, Trans.). New York: Peter Lang.
Woller, G. M. (1996). Business ethics, society, and Adam Smith: Some observations on the liberal business ethos. Journal of Socio-Economics,
(3), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaborowski, H. (2010). Robert Spaemann’s philosophy of the human person: Nature, freedom, and the critique of modernity
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar