Date: 31 Jul 2011
Board Composition and Financial Performance: Uncovering the Effects of Diversity in an Emerging Economy
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
We examine the key elements of board diversity (or heterogeneity) amongst listed companies operating in an emerging economy (Mauritius) and the extent to which these influence financial performance. Specifically, we ask whether there is evidence of tangible benefits in pursuing a strategy of board diversity in terms of gender-, age-, educational background and independence in a corporate context which has long been dominated by family-led and ‘closed’ boardrooms. In light of recent corporate governance developments which appear to foster greater diversity, we examine data from the 2007 annual reports of all 42 companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius. We find that (i) women remain poorly represented on boards (ii) there is a relatively satisfactory level of heterogeneity in terms of educational background, age and independence in relation to developed countries. We also find significant regression coefficients for all four variables in terms of their impact on short-term performance. However, these relationships are characterised by both negative and positive impacts thereby leading to discussions on the validity of a strict heterogeneous or homogeneous board composition in the context of a developing economy.
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2008) Women in the board and their impact on governance and performance. Center for Economic Institutions Working Paper Series, No. 2008-7, Hitotsubashi University, Japan.
Alves, C., & Mendes, V. (2004). Corporate governance policy and company performance: The Portuguese case. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 290–301.CrossRef
Arfken, D. E., Bellar, S. L., & Helms, M. M. (2004). The ultimate glass ceiling revisited: The presence of women on corporate boards. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 177–186.CrossRef
Argenti, J. (1976). Corporate collapse: The causes and symptoms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bantel, K. (1993). Strategic clarity in banking: Role of top management-team demography. Psychological Reports, 73, 1187–1203.CrossRef
Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 1(1), 101–120.
Beasley, M., Carcello, J., Hermanson, D., & Lapides, P. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454.CrossRef
Brancato, C. K., & Patterson, D. J. (1999) Board diversity in U.S. corporations: Best practices for broadening the profile of corporate boards. Research Report 1230-99-RR, The Conference Board, New York, NY.
Brennan, N., & McDermott, M. (2004). Alternative perspectives on independence of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12, 325–336.CrossRef
Burke, R. J. (1997). Women directors: Selection, acceptance and benefits of board membership. Corporate Governance, 5, 118–125.CrossRef
Burke, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors: The timing is right. Women in Management Review, 18(7), 346–348.CrossRef
Burton, P. (2000). Antecedents and consequences of corporate governance structures. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(3), 194–203.CrossRef
Cannella, A. A., Park, J., & Lee, H. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768–784.CrossRef
Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2008). The diversity of corporate board committees and financial performance. Working Paper, SSRN.
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. The Financial Review, 38, 33–53.CrossRef
Catalyst. (2004). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. New York: Catalyst.
Chandler, M. (1975, September–October). It’s time to clean up the boardroom. Harvard Business Review, pp. 73–82.
Dunn, P. (2004). The impact of insider power on fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Management, 30, 397–412.CrossRef
Elsayed, K. K. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1203–1214.CrossRef
Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRef
Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106.CrossRef
Gilpatrick, K. (2000). Invite youthful insight. Credit Union Management, 23, 28–29.
Hambrick, D., Cho, T., & Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firm’s competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–685.CrossRef
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. http://www.dti.gov.uk/cld/non_execs_review.
Houle, C. O. (1990). Who should be on your board? Nonprofit World, 8, 33–35.
Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian Boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 194–207.CrossRef
Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., et al. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 445–465.CrossRef
Krambia-Kapardis, M., & Psaros, J. (2006). The implementation of corporate governance principles in an emerging economy: A critique of the situation in Cyprus. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 126–139.CrossRef
Laing, D., & Weir, C. M. (1999). Governance structures, size and corporate performance in UK Firms. Management Decision, 37(5), 457–464.CrossRef
Mallin, C. (2001). Corporate governance and the bottom line. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(2), 77–78.CrossRef
Monks, R. A. G. (2001). Redesigning corporate governance structures and systems for the twenty first century. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 142–147.CrossRef
Mueller, D. C. (2006). The Anglo-Saxon approach to corporate governance and its applicability to emerging markets. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(4), 207–219.CrossRef
Murray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125–141.CrossRef
National Committee on Corporate Governance. (2004). Report and code on corporate governance for Mauritius. Ministry of Finance and Economic Development.
OECD. (2004). OECD principles of corporate governance. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, France.
Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.CrossRef
Ow-Yong, K., & Guan, C. K. (2000). Corporate governance codes: A comparison between Malaysia and UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(2), 125–132.CrossRef
Ramgutty-Wong, A. (2000). CEO attitudes towards women managers in corporate Mauritius. Women in Management Review, 15(4), 184–196.CrossRef
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2000). Doing ‘Boards-in-Action’ research—An ethnographic approach for the capture and analysis of directors’ and senior managers’ interactive routines. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(3), 244–257.CrossRef
Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 1313–1320.CrossRef
Simons, T., & Pelled, L. (1999). Understanding executive diversity: More than meets the eye. Human Resource Planning, 22, 49–51.
Solomon, J. F., Wei Lin, S., Norton, S. D., & Solomon, A. (2003). Corporate governance in Taiwan: empirical evidence from Taiwanese company directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 235–248.CrossRef
Soobaroyen, T., & Mahadeo, J. D. (2008). Selective compliance with the corporate governance code in Mauritius: Is legitimacy theory at work? Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 239–272.CrossRef
Stephenson, C. (2004). Leveraging diversity to maximum advantage: The business case for appointing more women to boards. Ivey Business Journal, 1–5.
Thanacoody, P. R., Bartram, T., Barker, M., & Jacobs, K. (2006). Career progression among female academics: A comparative study of Australia and Mauritius. Women in Management Review, 21(7), 536–553.CrossRef
Tsamenyi, M., & Uddin, S. (2008). Introduction to corporate governance in less developed and emerging economies. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8, 1–11.CrossRef
Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. A. (2010). Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial Issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 550–571.CrossRef
Uddin, S. (2008). Rationality, traditionalism and the state of corporate governance mechanisms: Illustrations from a less developed country. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(7), 1026–1105.CrossRef
Wanyama, S., Burton, B., & Helliar, C. (2009). Frameworks underpinning corporate governance: Evidence on Ugandan perceptions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 159–175.CrossRef
Wilkins, A. L., & Ouchi, W. G. (1983). Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 466–481.CrossRef
World Bank. (2002). Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC). Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Mauritius.
Zelechowski, D. D., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors in the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 337–342.CrossRef
- Board Composition and Financial Performance: Uncovering the Effects of Diversity in an Emerging Economy
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 105, Issue 3 , pp 375-388
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Board diversity
- Financial performance
- Developing country
- Corporate governance
- Industry Sectors