“Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
There is an unresolved paradox concerning the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in consumer behavior. On the one hand, consumers demand more and more CSR information from corporations. On the other hand, research indicates a considerable gap between consumers’ apparent interest in CSR and the limited role of CSR in purchase behavior. This article attempts to shed light on this paradox by drawing on qualitative data from in-depth interviews. The findings show that the evaluation of CSR initiatives is a complex and hierarchically structured process, during which consumers distinguish between core, central, and peripheral factors. This article describes these factors in detail and explains the complexity of consumers’ assessment of CSR. These insights then serve as a basis for discussing the theoretical and managerial implications of the research findings. To this end, the article contributes to a better understanding of the role of CSR in consumption decisions.
- Auger, P., & Devinney, T. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 361–383. CrossRef
- Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53. CrossRef
- Beckmann, S. C., Christensen, A. S., & Christensen, A. G. (2001). Myths of nature and environmentally responsible behaviours: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the EMAC, Bergen.
- Belk, R. W., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8(3), 275–289. CrossRef
- Bernhard, R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
- Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.
- Biehal, G. J., & Sheinin, D. A. (2007). The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio. Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 12–25. CrossRef
- Bower, A. B., & Grau, S. L. (2009). Explicit donations and inferred endorsements. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 113–126. CrossRef
- Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608. CrossRef
- Bristol, T., & Fern, E. F. (2003). The effects of interaction on consumers’ attitudes in focus groups. Psychology and Marketing, 20(5), 433–454. CrossRef
- Bronn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222.
- Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. CrossRef
- Brunk, K. H. (2010a). Exploring origins of ethical company/brand perceptions—A consumer perspective of corporate ethics. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 255–262. CrossRef
- Brunk, K. H. (2010b). Reputation building: Beyond our control? Inferences in consumers’ ethical perception formation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(4), 275–292. CrossRef
- Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577. CrossRef
- Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. (2008). Corporate social responsibility—Readings and cases in a global context. US and Canada: Routledge.
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design—Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). US: Sage.
- Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. CrossRef
- Devinney, T. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44–56. CrossRef
- Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., Eckhardt, G., & Birtchnell, T. (2006). The other CSR: Consumer social responsibility. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=901863.
- Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157. CrossRef
- European, C. (2001). Corporate social responsibility. 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/index_en.htm.
- Fischer, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315. CrossRef
- Geoffrey, P. L. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595. CrossRef
- Ghauri, P. N., & Gronhaug, K. (2002). Research methods in business studies—A practical guide (2nd ed.). Essex: Prentice Hall.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing.
- Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98. CrossRef
- Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16–32. CrossRef
- Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57–72. CrossRef
- Marin, L., & Ruiz, S. (2007). “I need you too!” corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 245–260. CrossRef
- McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006a). Corporate social responsibility: International perspectives. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(1), 1–12.
- McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006b). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18. CrossRef
- Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147. CrossRef
- Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72. CrossRef
- Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 125–140. CrossRef
- Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301. CrossRef
- Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 38(2), 225–243. CrossRef
- Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166. CrossRef
- Siegle, L. (2009). Is buying fair trade a waste of money? The Observer Magazine, p. 59.
- Sinkovics, R. R., Penz, E., & Ghauri, P. N. (2005). Analysing textual data in international marketing research. Qualitative Market Research, 8(1), 9–38. CrossRef
- Smith, V., & Langford, P. (2009). Evaluating the impact of corporate social responsibility programs on consumers. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(1), 97–109. CrossRef
- Snider, J., Paul, R. H., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187. CrossRef
- Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503. CrossRef
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Sykes, W. (1990). Validity and reliability in qualitative market research: A review of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32(3), 289–328.
- Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95–105. CrossRef
- Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170–180. CrossRef
- Wooten, D. B., & Reed Ii, A. (2000). A conceptual overview of the self-presentational concerns and response tendencies of focus group participants. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 9(3), 141–153. CrossRef
- “Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 104, Issue 4 , pp 449-460
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Corporate social responsibility
- Consumer behavior
- Purchase intention
- Qualitative research
- Industry Sectors