Skip to main content
Log in

How do Leading Retail MNCs Leverage CSR Globally? Insights from Brazil

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines how multinational corporations (MNCs) from the retail sector deal with four challenges they face when adopting Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies: the challenge of developing well-performing CSR projects and programs, building competitive advantages based on CSR, responding to local stakeholder issues in the host countries and learning from different CSR experiences on a worldwide basis. Based on in-depth case studies of two globally leading retail MNCs (with strong operations in Latin America), the concept of Transverse CSR Management emerged. Transverse CSR Management is defined as a distinctive form of organizational configuration that crosses different functional areas, country operations, and the boundaries of the firm. In particular, this article makes three main contributions: (1) we identify four central challenges faced by MNC managers when developing their CSR strategies; (2) we propose the concept of Transverse CSR Management to face these central challenges (together, at the same time) and identify its key elements (top management, external stakeholders, functional areas, and country subsidiaries); and (3) we propose four mechanisms (hierarchical, relational, cultural, and collaborative) through which the concept of Transverse CSR Management can be implemented by practicing managers. This study provides valuable insights for MNC managers in headquarters and subsidiaries on the issues they need to address in order to successfully deal with the four CSR-related challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arraya, M. (2006) Exploring Terra Incognita: Non-financial Reporting in Corporate Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship. 21:25-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barin-Cruz, L.; Pedrozo, E. A; Bacima, R. and Queiroz, B. 2007. Company and Society: The “Caras do Brasil” (Faces of Brazil) program as leverage for sustainable development. Management Decision, 45: 8, 1297-1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L. 2007. Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review. 33: 3, 794-816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett C.A., Ghoshal S, (1989) Managing across borders: the transnational solution, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. and Morrison, A. 1995. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26: 4, 729-754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. and K. Eisenhardt: 1995, ‚Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions’, The Academy of Management Review 20(2), 343–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudnovsky, D. and Roitter, M. 2008. Arcor Group’s Internationalization and the Arcor Foundation in Brazil. Case # SKE110, Havard Business School Press, Cambridge (MA). .

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theory from Case Studies Research. Academy of Management Review, 14:4, 532-550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, W. and J. Behrman (1979) The Coordination of Foreign R&D Activities by Transnational Corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 10(3): 28-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, T. & Pedersen, T. 2002. Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context, Journal of International Management , 8, 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O. and M. Zedtwitz (2003), International Process in Transnational Corporations. In: Shavinina, L. (eds) International Handbook of Innovation. New Jersey: Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C. 1988. Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19: 365-388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and Nohria, N. 1993. Horses for courses: organizational forms of multinational corporations, Sloan Management Review, 34(2): 23-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. and Govindarajan, V. 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 768-792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. and Govindarajan, V. 1994. Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Review, 3(4): 443-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. and Allen, D. B. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies. 37, 838-849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.; Felps, W. & Bigley, G. A. 2007. Ethical Theory and Stakeholder-Related Decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review. 32 (1), 137-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. and R. R. Pinto 2007. Banco Real: Banking on Sustainability. Case #: 305100,Havard Business School Press, Cambridge (MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J. and Jarillo, C. 1991. Coordination demands of international strategies, Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 429-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. & Moon, J. 2008. “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review. 33 (2), 404-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A., Siegel D. (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective, Academy of Management Review 26(1):117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D.; Debeljuh, P and Arruda, M. C. 2006. Corporate Ethical Policies in Large Corporations in Argentina, Brazil and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 21-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, MB. & Huberman, AM. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel, R. and, Birkinshaw, J., 1998. Innovation in multinational corporations: control and communication patterns in international R&D operations. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 479-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N. and Ghoshal, S., 1997. The differentiated network: A new model for organizing multinational corporations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, S., 2000. Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 5, 525-548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, J. A. P. 2006. Corporate Citizenship in Latin America: New Challenges for Business. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship. 21, 17-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, J. A. P. and Gardetti, M. 2006. From the Periphery to the Center: Analysing Changes to Prioritize Corporate Citizenship in Perez-Companc, Argentina. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 71-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., and Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, S.L. and Brock, D.M. 2002. The development of subsidiary management research: review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review, 11, 139-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peinado-Vara, E. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship. 21, 61-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persaud, A., Kumar, U. and Kumar, V. 2002. Coordination structures and innovative performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19: 1, 57-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‚The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review, 56–86.

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‚Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review, 78–92.

  • Randoy, T. & Li, J. 1998 Global resource flows and MNE network integration. In: Hood, N. (Ed) Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. A. & Yuthas, K. 2008. Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics. 78, 47-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P.; Siegel, D. S.; Hillman, A. and Eden, L. 2006 Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies. 37, 733-746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. and Fouts, P. 1997. A Resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with Case Studies. Academy of Management Journal , 50:1, 20-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simola, S. K. 2007. The pragmatics of care in sustainable global enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics . 74, 131-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, J. 1997. Autonomy and procedural justice: A framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 28: 1, 51-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD: 2005, World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D (United Nations, New York & Geneva).

  • Waddock S., Graves S (1997) The corporate social performance-financial link. Strategic Management Journal 18:303-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Our Common Future, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. 2002. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., & Tavares, A. T. 2004. Centralization and autonomy: back to the future. International Business Review, 13, 215-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., R. Dharwadkar and G. George: 2000, ‚Entrepreneurship in Multinational Subsidiaries: The Effects of Corporate and Local Environmental Contexts’, http://www.ciber.gatech.edu/workingpaper/99_00-27.pdf. Retrieved 28 April 2003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Barin Cruz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barin Cruz, L., Boehe, D.M. How do Leading Retail MNCs Leverage CSR Globally? Insights from Brazil. J Bus Ethics 91 (Suppl 2), 243–263 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0617-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0617-8

Key words

Navigation