Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 83, Issue 4, pp 789–804

An Experimental Investigation of Emotions and Reasoning in the Trolley Problem

Authors

    • Department of Economic Science and Quantitative Methods (SEMeQ), Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of Eastern Piedmont at Novara
    • Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics (EIPE), Faculty of PhilosophyErasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
  • Chiara Chelini
    • Department of EconomicsTurin University
  • Salvatore Rizzello
    • Department of Legal and Economic ScienceFaculty of Law, University of Eastern Piedmont at Alessandria
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9665-8

Cite this article as:
Lanteri, A., Chelini, C. & Rizzello, S. J Bus Ethics (2008) 83: 789. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9665-8

Abstract

Elaborating on the notions that humans possess different modalities of decision-making and that these are often influenced by moral considerations, we conducted an experimental investigation of the Trolley Problem. We presented the participants with two standard scenarios (‹lever’ and ‹stranger’) either in the usual or in reversed order. We observe that responses to the lever scenario, which result from (moral) reasoning, are affected by our manipulation; whereas responses to the stranger scenario, triggered by moral emotions, are unaffected. Furthermore, when asked to express general moral opinions on the themes of the Trolley Problem, about half of the participants reveal some inconsistency with the responses they had previously given.

Keywords

experimentsintuitionmoral emotionsmoral judgementmoral reasoningtrolley problem
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008