Abrams, F. W.: (1951), ‹Management’s responsibilities in a complex world’, Harvard Business Review
Alversson, M. and H. Wilmott: (1992), ‹Critical Theory and Management Studies: An introduction’, in M. Alversson and H. Wilmott (eds.), Critical Management Studies (London, Sage), pp. 1–20.
Amaeshi, K. M. and B. Adi: (2007), ‹Reconstructing the corporate social responsibility construct in Utlish’, Business Ethics
. European Review (Chichester, England)
Andriof, J. and M. McIntosh: (2001) Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK).
Banerjee, S. B.: (2003), ‹The practice of Stakeholder Colonialism: National interest and colonial discourses in the management of indigenous stakeholders’, in A. Prasad (ed.), Postcolonial theory and Organizational analysis (Palgrave, New York), pp. 255–279.
Banerjee, S. B.: (2007) Corporate social responsibility : the good, the bad and the ugly (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).
Bendell, J.: (2004) Barricades and Boardrooms: A contemporary history of the Corporate Accountability Movement (UNRISD, Geneva).
Berle, A. A., Jr.: (1931), ‹Corporate Powers as powers in trust’, Harvard Law Review
Bowen, H. R.: (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper & Row, New York).
Campbell, T.: (2007), ‹The normative grounding of corporate social responsibility: a human rights approach’, in D. J. McBarnet., A. Voiculescu and T. Campbell (Eds.), The new corporate accountability : corporate social responsibility and the law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Carroll, A. B.: (1979), ‹A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’, Academy of Management Review,
, 497–505. doi:10.2307/257850
Carroll, A. B.: (1998), ‹The four faces of corporate citizenship’, Business and Society Review,
, 1–7. doi:10.1111/0045-3609.00008
Carroll, A. B.: (1999), ‹Corporate social responsibility - evolution of a definitional construct’, Business & Society,
, 268–295. doi:10.1177/000765039903800303
Carroll, A. B.: (2008), ‹A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices’, in A. Crane, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility
(Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 19–46.CrossRef
Collier, D., Hidalgo, F. D. and Maciuceanu, A.O: (2006),’Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications’, Journal of Political Ideologies,
, 211–246. doi:10.1080/13569310600923782
Connolly, W. E.: (1974) The Terms of Political Discourse (Heath, Lexington).
Crane, A. et al. (eds.): 2008, The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, New York).
Dahlsrud, A.: (2008), ‹How CSR is Defined’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Davis, K.: (1960), ‹Can Business afford to ignore Corporate Social Responsibility?’, California Management Review,
Davis, K.: (1967), ‹Understanding the Social Responsibility Puzzle’, Business Horizons,
(4), 45–51. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(67)90007-9
Davis, K.: (1973), ‹The case for and against the assumption of social responsibilities’, Academy of Management Review,
, 312–322. doi:10.2307/255331
Dodd, E. M.: (1932), ‹For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?’, Harvard Law Review,
, 1145–1163. doi:10.2307/1331697
Donaldson.T.: (1983), ‹Constructing a social contract for business,’ in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business (Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 153–166.
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W: (1994), ‹Towards a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory’, Academy of Management Review,
, 252–284. doi:10.2307/258705
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W: (1999) Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts approach to Business (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E.: (1995), ‹The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications’, Academy of Management Review,
(1), 65–91. doi:10.2307/258887
Donham, W. B.: (1927),’ The social significance of business’, Harvard Business Review,
Donham, W. B.: (1929), ‹Business Ethics - A general survey’, Harvard Business Review,
Evans, W. M. and Freeman, R. E: (1988), ‹A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice- Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 75–93.
Frederick, W. C.: (2006) Corporation, be good!: the story of corporate social responsibility (Dog Ear Publishing, Indianapolis, IN).
Freeden, M.: (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory (Claredon Press, Oxford).
Freeman, R.E.: (1984) Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach (Pitman, Boston).
Freeman, R. E.: (2002), ‹A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation’, in L. P. Hartman (ed.), Perspectives in Business (McGraw-Hill, Boston), pp. 171–181.
Freeman, R. E. and Evans, W.M: (1990), ‹Corporate Governance: A stakeholder interpretation’, The Journal of Behavioral Economics,
(4), 337–359. doi:10.1016/0090-5720(90)90022-Y
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, September 13th, pp. 32, 33, 122, 126.
Frynas, J. G.: (2005), ‹The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: evidence of multinational oil companies’, International Affairs,
, 581–598. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00470.x
Galbraith, J. K.: (1978) The New Industrial State (3rd ed.) (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).
Gallie, W. B.: 1956, ‹Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
56, 167–198 reprinted in M. Black (ed.): 1962, The Importance of Language (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 121–146 (pages cited in the paper refer to the reprint edition).
Garrett, T. M.: (1966) Business Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
Garriga, E. M. and Mele, D. (2004), ‹Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory’, Journal of Business Ethics,
Gellner, E.: (1967), ‹The concept of a story’, Ratio,
Gray, J. N. (1977), ‹On the Contestability of social and political concepts’, Political Theory,
Hemingway, C. A.: (2002) An exploratory analysis of corporate social responsibility : definitions, motives and values (University of Hull Business School, Hull).
Hess, D and Dunfee T W: (2007), ‹The Kasky-Nike threat to corporate social reporting: Implementing a standard of optimal truthful disclosure as a solution’, Business Ethics Quarterly,
Hoff, D.: (2006), ‹South African Cellular Wars in Nigeria’, International Journal of Emerging Markets
Hopkins, M.: (2003) The planetary bargain: corporate social responsibility matters (Earthscan, London).
Jensen, M. C.: (2002), ‹Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Function’, Business Ethics Quarterly,
(2), 235–256. doi:10.2307/3857812
Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R. and Welters, C: (1999), ‹International codes of conduct and corporate social responsibility: Can transnational corporations regulate themselves?’, Transnational Corporations,
Lantos, G. P.: (2001),’The Boundaries of Strategic CSR’, Journal of Consumer Marketing,
, 595–630. doi:10.1108/07363760110410281
Leipziger, D.: (2003) The Corporate Responsibility Code book (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK).
Levitt, T.: (1958), ‹The Dangers of Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review,
Lukes, S.: (1974) Power: A Radical View (London, Macmillan).
Lukes, S.: 2005, Power: A Radical View (2nd ed.) (Palgrave Macmillan).
Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P: (2003), ‹Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business’, Administrative Science Quarterly,
, 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659
Matten, D. and Crane, A. (2005), ‹Corporate Citizenship: Toward an extended conceptualisation’, Academy of Management Review,
Matten, D., Crane, A. and Chapple, W: (2003), ‹Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship’, Journal of Business Ethics,
, 109–120. doi:10.1023/A:1024128730308
Matten, D. and Moon, J: (2004) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR : a conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe (International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, Nottingham).
McBarnet, D. et al. (eds): 2007, The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
Mcintosh, M.: (2002) Living corporate citizenship (FT/Prentice Hall).
McIntyre, A.: (1973),’ The Essential Contestability of Some Social Concepts’, Ethics,
(1), 1–9. doi:10.1086/291897
Mcmahon, T. F. (1986),’ Models of the relationship of firm to society’, Journal of Business Ethics,
, 181–191. doi:10.1007/BF00383624
Mcwilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001), ‹Corporate Social Responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’, Academy of Management Review,
(1), 117–127. doi:10.2307/259398
McWilliams A, Siegel d. and P Wright. (2006),’ Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic implications’, Journal of Management Studies,
, 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
Ogden, S and Watson, R. (1999),’ Corporate Performance and Stakeholder Management: Balancing Shareholder and customer interests in the UK privatised water industry’, Academy of Management Journal,
(5), 526–538. doi:10.2307/256974
Omiyi, B. (Managing Director, Shell Petroleum Development Corporation Nigeria): 2007, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Oil and Gas Industry. Paper Presented at the UN Global Compact Nigerian Network International Conference on CSR 6–7 March 2007. www.nesgroup.org
. Assessed April 2007.
Palazzo, G. S. and Scherer, A. G: (2006),’ Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A communicative Framework’, Journal of Business Ethics,
, 71–88. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9044-2
Palazzo, G. S. and Scherer, A. G: (2007),’ Towards a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review,
Palazzo, G. S. and Scherer, A. G: (2008),’ Globalisation and Corporate Social Responsibility’, in A. Crane.et al. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 413–431.
Phillips, R. A.: (1997),’ Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness’, Business Ethics Quarterly,
(1), 51–66. doi:10.2307/3857232
Porter, M.E and Kramer, M.R: (2002),’ The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review,
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E. and Sachs, S: (2002) Redefining the corporation: stakeholder management and organisational wealth (Stanford University Press, Stanford).
Prahalad C. K and Hammond A: (2002),’ Serving the World’s poor profitably’, Harvard Business Review,
80(9), 48–58 .
Preston, L. E and Post, J. E: (1975) Private Management and Public Policy (N.J. Prentice- Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs).
Preston, L. E and Post, J. E: (1981), ‹Private Management and Public Policy’, California Management Review,
Rawls, J : (1972) A Theory of Justice (Claredon Press, Oxford).
Shamir, R.: (2005), ‹Corporate social responsibility: a case of hegemony and counter-Hegemony’, in D. S. Santos (ed.), Law and Globalisation from below- Towards a cosmopolitan legality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 92–117.
Spence, L. J.: (2007),’ Corporate social responsibility and small business in a European policy context’, Business and Society Review,
(4), 533–552. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8594.2007.00308.x
Spector B.: (2006),’The Harvard Business Review goes to War’, Management and Organizational History
Spector, B. (2008),’ Business Responsibilities in a Divided World: The Cold War Roots of the Corporate Social Responsibility Movement’, Enterprise and Society,
(2), 314–336. doi:10.1093/es/khn023
Stanfield, J. R and Carroll, M. C: (2002), ‹Governance and the Legitimacy of Corporate Power: A path of convergence for heterodox economics?’, Journal of Economic Issues
Swanton, C.: (1985),’ On the ‹essential contestedness’ of political concepts’, Ethics,
(4), 811–827. doi:10.1086/292685
Tullberg, J.: (2004),’ Illusions of Corporate Power: Revisiting the relative powers of corporations and governments’, Journal of Business Ethics,
(4), 325–323. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-1530-9
Van Marrewijk, M.: (2003),’ Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion’, Journal of Business Ethics,
(2–3), 95–105. doi:10.1023/A:1023331212247
Votaw, D.: (1972),’ Genius Becomes Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility Pt 1’, California Management Review,
Waddock, S.: (2001),’ The multiple bottom lines of corporate citizenship: social investing, reputation and responsibility audits’, Business and Society Review,
, 323–345. doi:10.1111/0045-3609.00085
Waldron, J.: (2002),’ Is the rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (In Florida)?’, Law and Philosophy,
Watrick, S. L. and Cochran, P. L: (1985),’ The evolution of the corporate social performance model’, Academy of Management Review,
(4), 758–769. doi:10.2307/258044
Werther, W. B. and Chandler, D: (2006) Strategic corporate social responsibility: stakeholders in a global environment (London, Sage).
Whitehouse, L. A : (2003),’ Corporate social responsibility, corporate citizenship and the global compact: A new approach to regulating corporate social power’, Global
. Social Policy,
Whitehouse, L.A.: (2005), ‹CSR as regulation: The Argument from democracy, in O’brien, J. (Ed.), Governing the Corporation (Wiley & Sons Ltd., England), pp. 141–162.
Windsor, D.: (2006),’ Corporate Social Responsibility – three key approaches’, Journal of Management Studies,
, 93–114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.x
Wolf, M.: 2001, Sleepwalking with the Enemy 16th May (Financial Times)
Wood, D. J.: (1991),’ Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review,
, 691–718. doi:10.2307/258977
Wood, D. J and Logsdon, J. M: (2001), ‹Theorising business citizenship’, in J. Anriof and M. Mcintosh (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK), pp. 83–103.
Zerk, J. A.: (2006) Multinationals and corporate social responsibility: limitations and opportunities in international law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).