Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The monitoring role performed by the board of directors is an important corporate governance control mechanism, especially in countries where external mechanisms are less well developed. The gender composition of the board can affect the quality of this monitoring role and thus the financial performance of the firm. This is part of the “business case” for female participation on boards, though arguments may also be framed in terms of ethical considerations. While the issue of board gender diversity has attracted growing research interest in recent years, most empirical results are based on U.S. data. This article adds to a growing number of non-U.S. studies by investigating the link between the gender diversity of the board and firm financial performance in Spain, a country which historically has had minimal female participation in the workforce, but which has now introduced legislation to improve equality of opportunities. We investigate the topic using panel data analysis and find that gender diversity – as measured by the percentage of women on the board and by the Blau and Shannon indices – has a positive effect on firm value and that the opposite causal relationship is not significant. Our study suggests that investors in Spain do not penalise firms which increase their female board membership and that greater gender diversity may generate economic gains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A., C. R. Knoeber: 1996, Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems Between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aja, E., F. Carbonell, W. Pereda, C. Ioė, J. Funes and I. Vila: 2000, ‹La inmigración extranjera en España’. Los retos educativos', Colección de Estudios Sociales, 1, Fundación La Caixa, Barcelona

  • Aldama Report: 2003, ‹Report of the Special Commission for the Promotion of the Transparency and the Security in the Financial Markets and in Listed Companies’, Madrid

  • Andreoni J., L. Vesterlund: 2001, Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M., O. Bover: 1990, Un Estudio Econométrico Con Datos de Panel. Investigaciones Económicas, 14, 3–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballesta J. P. S., E. García-Meca: 2005, Audit Qualifications and Corporate Governance in Spanish Listed Firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20, 725–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, S.: 2006, ‹Measuring the Diversity of What? And for What Purpose? A Conceptual Comparison of Ecological and Economic Biodiversity Indices’, Working Paper, University of Heidelberg

  • Beekes W., P. Pope, S. Young: 2004, The Link Between Earnings Timeliness, Earnings Conservatism and Board Composition: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Corporate Governance, 12, 47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau P. M.: 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocatto, E.: 2006, ‹Family Owned Business Succession: The Influence of Pre-Performance in the Nomination of Family and Non-Family Members: Evidence from Spanish Firms’, Paper presented at the Department of Economics de l’Empresa Jornada Conference, November 30, 2006. Available at: http://selene.uab.es/dep-economia-empresa/Jornadas/Papers/2006_11/IVJornadas_paper_EBocatto.pdf

  • Böhren, O. and R. O. Ström: 2005, ‹Aligned, Informed, and Decisive: Characteristics of Value-Creating Boards’, Working Paper, Norwegian School of Management BI, Oslo, September

  • Brammer S., A. Millington, S. Pavelin: 2007, Gender and Ethnic Diversity Among UK Corporate Boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Kruse J., D. Hummels: 1993, Gender Differences in Laboratory Public Goods Contribution: Do Individuals Put their Money where their Mouth is? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22, 255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Suárez K., D. J. Santana-Martín: 2004, Governance in Spanish Family Business. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 10(1/2), 141–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury Report: 1992, Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera N., I. Gutiérrez, C. Salvador: 2001, Gender, the State and the Audit Profession: Evidence from Spain (1942–88). European Accounting Review, 10, 803–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter D. A., B. J. Simkins, W. G. Simpson: 2003, Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst: 2004, The Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity. New York: Catalyst

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst: 2006, 2005 Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500. New York: Catalyst

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst: 2007, 2006 Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500. New York: Catalyst

    Google Scholar 

  • Catan, T.: 2006, ‹In the Dark Heart of Machismo Shines a Beacon of Sexual Equality’, The Times, November 29

  • Cervantes Institute: 1999, Anuario 1999. Centro Virtual Cervantes, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores: 2006, Report of the Special Working Group on the Good Governance of Listed Companies. CNMV: Madrid, 19 May

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox T. H., S. Blake: 1991, Managing Cultural Diversity: Implication for Organizational Competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Curdová, A.: 2005, ‹Discrimination Against Women in the Workforce and the Workplace’, Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men, Spanish Parliamentary Assembly, Doc. 10484

  • Demsetz H., B. Villalonga: 2001, Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Rietz A., M. Henrekson: 2000, Testing the Female Underperformance Hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley P. C., E. Mosakowski: 2000, Creating Hybrid Team Cultures: An Empirical Test of Transnational Team Functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt N. L., J. D. Werbel, C. B. Shrader: 2003, Board of Directors Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E. F., M. C. Jensen: 1983, Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell K. A., P. L. Hersch: 2005, Additions to Corporate Boards: the Effect of Gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández A. I., S. Gómez-Ansón, C. Fernández-Méndez: 1998, El Papel Supervisor del Consejo de Administración Sobre la Actuación Gerencial. Evidencia Para el Caso Español. Investigaciones Económicas, 22, 501–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerke W., M. Bank, M. Steiger: 2003, The Changing Role of Institutional Investors – A German Perspective. In Hopt, K. J., E. Wymeersch (eds.), Capital Markets and Company Law (New York: Oxford University Press), (pp 357–385)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith J. M.: 1999, CEO Ownership and Firm Value. Managerial and Decision Economics, 20, 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H.: 1999, ‹Innovation and Firm Value’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6984. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w6984.pdf/

  • Hambrick D. C., T. S. Cho, M. J. Chen: 1996, The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms’ Competitive Moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A. and K. J. Klein: 2007, ‹What’s the Difference? Diversity Constructs as Separation, Variety, or Disparity in Organizations’, Academy of Management Review (forthcoming)

  • Heidrick and Struggles: 2007, ‹Corporate Governance in Europe: 2007 Report’, Paris

  • Herfindahl, O. C.: 1950, ‹Concentration in the U.S. Steel Industry’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York

  • Hermalin B., M. S. Weisbach: 1991, The Effect of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Corporate Performance. Financial Management, 20, 101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, D. and P. McColgan: 2001, ‹Insider Ownership and Corporate Value: An Empirical Test from the United Kingdom Corporate Sector’, Financial Management Association (FMA) Meeting, Paris

  • Himmelberg C. P., R. G. Hubbard, D. Palia (1999), Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 353–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A. O.: 1964, The Paternity of an Index. American Economic Review, 54, 761–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland D. C., J. D. Diltz: 2002, Why Firms Diversify: An Empirical Examination. Financial Management, 31, 51–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO: 2007, ‹Global Employment Trends for Women Brief’, March, International Labour Organization, Geneva

  • Jaskiewicz P., V. M. González, S. Menéndez, D. Schiereck: 2005, Long-Run IPO Performance Analysis of German and Spanish Family-Owned Businesses. Family Business Review, 18(3), 179–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jianakoplos N. A., A. Bernasek: 1998, Are Women More Risk Averse? Economic Inquiry, 36, 620–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Kini O., W. Kracaw, S. Mian: 1995, Corporate Takeovers, Firm Performance, and Board Composition. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1, 383–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad A. M., V. W. Kramer: 2006, ‹How Many Women Do Boards Need?’, Harvard Business Review, December, 84(12), 22

  • La Porta R., F. Lopez de Silanes, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny: 1997, Legal Determinants of External Finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R., F. Lopez de Silanes, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny: 1998, Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R., F. Lopez de Silanes, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny: 2002, Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang L. H., R. M. Stulz: 1994, Tobin’s q, Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1248–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau D. C., J. K. Murnighan: 1998, Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg E., S. Ross: 1981, Tobin’s q Ratio and Industrial Organization. Journal of Business, 54(1), 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Iturriaga F. J., J. A. Rodríguez-Sanz: 2001, Ownership Structure, Corporate Value and Firm Investment: A Simultaneous Equations Analysis of Spanish Firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 179–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megna P., M. Klock: 1993, The Impact of Intangible Capital on Tobin’s q in the Semiconductor Industry. American Economic Review, 83, 265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery C., B. Wernerfelt: 1988, Tobin’s q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance. American Economic Review, 78(1), 246–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck R., A. Shleifer, R. W. Vishny: 1988, Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell C., S. Tinkler: 1994, The Influence of Gender on the Provision of a Public Good. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivencia Report: 1998, ‹Report of the Special Commission to Consider a Code of Ethics for Companies Boards of Directors’, Madrid

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: 2006a, OECD Labour Force Statistics by Age and Sex (OECD, Paris). http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/default.aspx

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: 2006b, Education at a Glance 2006 (OECD, Paris). http://www.oecd.org/edu/eag2006

  • Randøy, T., S. Thomsen and L. Oxelheim: 2006: ‹A Nordic Perspective on Corporate Board Diversity’, Working Paper, Nordic Innovation Centre, Oslo

  • Richard O. C., T. Barnett, S. Dwyer, K. Chadwick: 2004, Cultural Diversity in Management, Firm Performance, and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation Dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson G., K. Dechant: 1997, Building a Business Case for Diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose C.: 2007, Does Female Board Representation Influence Firm Performance? The Danish Evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C. E.: 1948, A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader C. B., V. B. Blackburn, J. P. Iles: 1997, Women in Management and Firm Financial Value: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 355–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson E. H. (1949), Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163, 688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smirlock M., T. W. Gilligan, W. J. Marshall: 1984, Tobin’s q and the Structure–Performance Relationship. American Economic Review, 74, 1051–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith N., V. Smith, M. Verner: 2006, Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2,500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soria, F.: 2002, ‹Los Principales Retos de la Empresa Familiar en el Siglo XXI’, Fusiones y Adquisiciones Capital & Corporate, Octubre, UNILCO

  • Steiner T. L.: 1996, A Reexamination of the Relationships Between Ownership Structure, Firm Diversification, and Tobin’s q. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 35(4), 39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, A.: 1998, ‹On the Economics and Analysis of Diversity’, Science Policy Research Unit Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper no. 28, University of Sussex

  • Tajfel H., J. Turner: 1986, The Social Identity of Inter-Group Behavior in Worchel S., W. Austin (eds.), Psychology and Intergroup Relations (Chicago: Nelson-Hall), pp. 7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbach M.: 1988, Outside Directors and CEO Turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N.: 1961, Cybernetics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams K., C. O’Reilly: 1998, Forty Years of Diversity Research: A Review, in Staw B. M., L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), pp. 77–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Wools, D.: 2007, ‹Spain Lawmakers OK Women’s Equality Law’, Associated Press, March 15

  • Yermack D.: 1996, Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Stirling, Cottrell Building, Stirling campus, Stirling, FK9 4LA, U.K.

    Kevin Campbell & Antonio Mínguez-Vera

Authors
  1. Kevin Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Mínguez-Vera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Campbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, K., Mínguez-Vera, A. Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance. J Bus Ethics 83, 435–451 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation