Skip to main content
Log in

Observations of the Early Evening Boundary-Layer Transition Using a Small Unmanned Aerial System

  • Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of the lower portion of the planetary boundary layer is investigated using the Small Multifunction Research and Teaching Sonde (SMARTSonde), an unmanned aerial vehicle developed at the University of Oklahoma. The study focuses on the lowest 200 m of the atmosphere, where the most noticeable thermodynamic changes occur during the day. Between October 2010 and February 2011, a series of flights was conducted during the evening hours on several days to examine the vertical structure of the lower boundary layer. Data from a nearby Oklahoma Mesonet tower was used to supplement the vertical profiles of temperature, humidity, and pressure, which were collected approximately every 30 min, starting 2 h before sunset and continuing until dusk. From the profiles, sensible and latent heat fluxes were estimated. These fluxes were used to diagnose the portion of the boundary layer that was most affected by the early evening transition. During the transition period, a shallow cool and moist layer near the ground was formed, and as the evening progressed the cooling affected an increasingly shallower layer just above the surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo OC, Fitzjarrald DR (2001) The early evening surface-layer transition: temporal and spatial variability. J Atmos Sci 58: 2650–2667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André J, De Moor G, Lacarrére P, Therry G, Du Vachat R (1978) Modeling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the planety boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 35: 1861–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodine D, Klein PM, Arms SC, Shapiro A (2009) Variability of surface air temperature over gently sloped terrain. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48: 1117–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin T, Zielke B, Bocangel W, Shalamunec W, Chilson PB (2011) An analysis of wind retrieval algorithms for small unmanned aerial systems. In: 91st American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, USA

  • Brock FV, Crawford KC, Elliott RL, Cuperus GW, Stadler SJ, Johnson HL, Eilts MD (1995) The oklahoma mesonet: A technical overview. J Atmos Ocean Technol 12: 5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilson PB, Gleason A, Zielke B, Nai F, Yeary M, Klein PM, Shalamunec W (2009) SMARTSonde: a small UAS platform to support radar research. In: 34th Conference on radar meteorology, American Meteorological Society. Extended abstract 12B.6, Boston. http://ams.confex.com/ams/34Radar/techprogram/paper_156396.htm

  • Deardorff J, Willis G, Stockton B (1980) Laboratory studies of the entrainment zone of a convectively mixed layer. J Fluid Mech 100: 41–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire SH (1990) Nieuwstadt’s stable boundary layer revisited. Q J R Meteorol Soc 116: 127–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elston JS, Roadman J, Stachura M, Argrow B, Houston A, Frew E (2011) The tempest unmanned aircraft system for in situ observations of tornadic supercells: design and VORTEX2 flight results. J Field Robotics 28: 461–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzjarrald DR, Lala G (1989) Hudson valley fog environments. J Appl Meteorol 28: 1303–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant AM (1997) An observational study of the evening transition boundary-layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 123: 657–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimsdell AW, Angevine WM (2002) Observations of the afternoon transition of the convective boundary layer. J Appl Meteorol 41: 3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha KJ, Mahrt L (2003) Radiative and turbulent fluxes in the nocturnal boundary layer. Tellus 55: 317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland G, Webster P, Curry J, Tyrell G, Gauntlett D, Brett G, Becker J, Hoag R, Vaglienti W (2001) The aerosonde robotic aircraft: a new paradigm for environmental observations. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82: 889–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland GJ, McGeer T, Youngren H (1992) Autonomous aerosondes for economical atmospheric soundings anywhere on the globe. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73: 1987–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston A, Argrow B, Elston JS, Lahowetz J, Frew E, Kennedy PC (2012) The collaborative Colorado–Nebraska unmanned aircraft system experiment. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 93: 39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimal JC, Wyngaard JC, Haugen DA, Cote OR, Izumi Y, Caughey S, Readings CJ (1976) Turbulence structure in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 33: 2152–2169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad T, Hill M, Rowland R, Meyer J (1970) A small, radio-controlled aircraft as a platform for meteorological sensors. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig 10: 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin PH (2006) Observations: the first successful typhoon eyewall-penetration reconnaissance flight mission conducted by the unmanned aerial vehicle, aerosonde. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87: 1481–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt L (1981) The early evening boundary layer transition. Q J R Meteorol Soc 107: 329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson RA, Fiebrich CA, Crawford KC, Kilby JR, Grimsley DL, Martinez JE, Basara JB, Illston BG, Morris DA, Kloesel KA, Melvin AD, Shrivastava H, Wolfinbarger JM, Bostic JP, Demko DB, Elliott RL, Stadler SJ, Carlson J, Sutherland AJ (2007) Statewide monitoring of the mesoscale environment: A techincal update on the Oklahoma Mesonet. J Atmos Ocean Technol 24: 301–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuder J, Brisset P, Jonassen M, Müller M, Mayer S (2009) The small unmanned meteorological observer SUMO: a new tool for atmospheric boundary layer research. Meteorol Z 18: 141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro A, Fedorovich E (2007) Katabatic flow along a differentially cooled sloping surface. J Fluid Mech 571: 149–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuqing M, Hongbin C, Gai W, Yi P, Qiang L (2004) A miniature robotic plane meteorological sounding system. Adv Atmos Sci 21: 890–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisterson DL, Frenzen P (1978) Nocturnal boundary-layer wind maxima and the problem of wind power assessment. Environ Sci Technol 12: 218–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess T, Bange J, Buschmann M, Vörsmann P (2007) First application of the meteorological Mini-UAV’ M2AV’. Meteorol Z 16: 159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storm B, Dudhia J, Basu S, Swift A, Giammanco I (2009) Evaluation of the weather research and forecasting model on forecasting low-level jets: implications for wind energy. Wind Energy 12: 81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor GI (1917) The formation of fog and mist. Q J R Meteorol Soc 43: 241–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Kroonenberg A, Martin T, Buschmann M, Bange J, Vorsmann P (2008) Measuring the wind vector using the autonomous mini aerial vehicle M2AV. J Atmos Ocean Technol 25: 1969–1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Kroonenberg A, Martin S, Beyrich F, Bange J (2012) Spatially-averaged temperature structure parameter over a heterogeneous surface measured by an unmanned aerial vehicle. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 142: 55–77. doi:10.1007/s10546-011-9662-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler H (1961) A boundary layer interpretation of the low-level jet. Tellus 13: 368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Bonin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonin, T., Chilson, P., Zielke, B. et al. Observations of the Early Evening Boundary-Layer Transition Using a Small Unmanned Aerial System. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146, 119–132 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9760-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9760-3

Keywords

Navigation