Wandering drunks and general lawlessness in biology: does diversity and complexity tend to increase in evolutionary systems?
- Lindell BromhamAffiliated withCentre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, Australian National University Email author
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Does biology have general laws that apply to all levels of biological organisation, across all evolutionary time? In their book “Biology’s first law: the tendency for diversity and complexity to increase in evolutionary systems” (2010), Daniel McShea and Robert Brandon propose that the most fundamental law of biology is that all levels of biological organisation have an underlying tendency to become more complex and diverse over time. A range of processes, most notably selection, can prevent the expression of this tendency, but they predict that, on average, we should see that lineages tend toward greater diversity and complexity, driven by fundamentally neutral processes. Their hypothesis can be summarised as “diversity is easy, stasis is hard”. Here, I consider evidence for this “zero force evolutionary law”. It provides a fair description of evolutionary change at the genomic level, but the predictions of the proposed law are not met for broad scale patterns in the evolution of the animal kingdom.
KeywordsEvolution Adaptation Phylogeny Genome Molecular evolution Drift Biodiversity ZFEL
- Wandering drunks and general lawlessness in biology: does diversity and complexity tend to increase in evolutionary systems?
Biology & Philosophy
Volume 26, Issue 6 , pp 915-933
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Molecular evolution
- Lindell Bromham (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia