Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Large herbivore responses to surface water and land use in an East African savanna: implications for conservation and human-wildlife conflicts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water, forage and predation constrain ungulate distributions in savannas. To understand these constraints, we characterized distributions of 15 herbivore species from water, locations of peak density and degree of clustering around the peaks using zero-inflated count data models and mapping census data collected in the Mara reserve and the adjoining pastoral ranches in Kenya during a wet and dry year. Herbivores followed a humped pattern (n = 46), suggesting constrained foraging in which they balance the benefits of proximity to water with the costs of foraging where food is depleted near water and travelling to more abundant food distant from water; an exponentially decreasing pattern (n = 11), indicating strong attraction to water or vegetation near water; or a uniform (n = 3) pattern. The details rather than the types of these patterns varied between years. Herbivores concentrated farther from water and more tightly around locations of their peak densities in the ranches than the reserve. Herbivores were more abundant and widely distributed from water in the wet than the dry year, and segregated along the distance-to-water gradient, presumably to minimize interspecific competition for food. Pastoralism compressed herbivore distributions and partially excluded some species (warthog, hartebeest, topi, wildebeest, zebra, eland, buffalo and elephant) from, while attracting others (Grant’s and Thomson’s gazelles, impala, giraffe) to the ranches, relative to the reserve. Regulating cultivation, fencing, settlements and livestock stocking levels in the ranches would allow continued wildlife access to water, reduce competition with, displacement or harassment of wildlife by people, livestock and dogs near water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler P, Hall SA (2005) The development of forage production and utilization around livestock watering points. Landsc Ecol 20:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TM, Hopcraft JGC, Eby S, Ritchie M, Grace JB, Olff H (2010) Landscape-scale analyses suggest both nutrient and antipredator advantages to Serengeti herbivore hotspots. Ecology 91:1519–1525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew MH (1988) Grazing impacts in relation to livestock watering points. Trends Ecol Evol 3:336–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boutton TW, Tieszen LL, Imbamba SK (1988a) Biomass dynamics of grassland vegetation in Kenya. Afr J Ecol 26:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutton TW, Tieszen LL, Imbamba SK (1988b) Seasonal changes in the nutrient content of East African grassland vegetation. Afr J Ecol 26:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun HMN (1973) Primary production in the Serengeti: purpose, methods and some results of research. Ann Univ d’Abidjan Ser E Ecol 4:171–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt B, Shortridge A, WinklerPrins AMGA (2009) Pastoral herd management, drought coping strategies, and cattle mobility in southern Kenya. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 99:309–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain JW III, Owen-Smith N, Macandza VA (2012) The costs of drinking: comparative water dependency of sable antelope and zebra. J Zool 286:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamaillé-Jammes S, Valeix M, Fritz H (2007) Managing heterogeneity in elephant distribution: interactions between elephant population density and surface-water availability. J Appl Ecol 44:625–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crosmary W-G, Valeix M, Fritz H, Madzikanda H, Côté SD (2012) African ungulates and their drinking problems: hunting and predation risks constrain access to water. Anim Behav 83:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer WF, Vis MJP, De Knegt HJ, Rowles C, Kohi EM, Van Langevelde F, Peel M, Pretorius Y, Skidmore AK, Slotow R, Van Wieren SE, Prins HHT (2010) Spatial distribution of lion kills determined by the water dependency of prey species. J Mammal 91:1280–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw J, Waweru MN, Okello OO, Maloba M, Nguru P, Said MY, Aligula HM, Heitkonig IMA, Reid RS (2001) Distribution and diversity of wildlife in northern Kenya in relation to livestock and permanent water points. Biol Conserv 100:297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker B, van Rooyen N, Bothma JD (1996) Habitat partitioning by ungulates on a gameranch in the Mopani veld. S Afr J Wildl Res 26:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI Inc. (2000) Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. Arc View Spatial Analyst, version 3.2a. Redlands, CA, USA

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1970) On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biother 19:16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM (1991) Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. Am Nat 138:478–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaylard A, Owen-Smith N, Redfern J (2003) Surface water availability: Implications for heterogeneity and ecosystem processes. In: du Toit JT, Rogers K, Biggs HC (eds) The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington, pp 171–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadis N, McNaughton SJ (1990) Elemental and fibre contents of savanna grasses: variation with grazing, soil type, season and species. J Appl Ecol 27:623–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gereta E, Wolanski E (1998) Wildlife-water quality interactions in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Afr J Ecol 36:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs NT, Swift DM (1988) Grazing in herds: when are nutritional benefits realized? Am Nat 131:760–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdo RM, Holt RD, Fryxell JM (2009) Opposing rainfall and plant nutritional gradients best explain the wildlife migration in the Serengeti. Am Nat 173:431–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopcraft JGC, Sinclair ARE, Packer C (2005) Planning for success: Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance. J Anim Ecol 74:559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopcraft JGC, Olff H, Sinclair ARE (2010) Herbivores, resources and risks: alternating regulation along primary environmental gradients in savannas. Trends Ecol Evol 25:119–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanga EM, Ogutu JO, Olff H, Piepho H-P (2010) Hippopotamus and livestock grazing: influences on riparian vegetation and facilitation of other herbivores in the Mara Region of Kenya. Landscape Ecol Eng 9:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M, Stuart A (1979) Advanced Theory of Statistics. Volume 2: Inference and relationship. 4th Ed. Charles Griffin, London

  • Kennedy M, Gray RD (1993) Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the Ideal Free Distribution. Oikos 68:158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprey RH, Reid RS (2004) Expansion of human settlement in Kenya’s Maasai Mara: what future for pastoralism and wildlife? J Biogeogr 31:997–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddock L (1979) The “migration” and grazing succession. In: Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (eds) Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 104–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhabu SW, Marotsi BM, Perkins J (2002) Vegetation gradients around artificial water points in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve of Botswana. Afr J Ecol 40:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mati BM, Mutie S, Gadain H, Home P, Mtalo F (2008) Impacts of use/cover changes on the hydrology of the transboundary Mara River, Kenya/Tanzania. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 13:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1979) Grassland-herbivore dynamics. In: Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (eds) Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 46–81

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1983) Serengeti grassland ecology: the role of composite environmental factors and contingency in community organization. Ecol Monogr 53:291–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1985) Ecology of a grazing system: the Serengeti. Ecol Monogr 55:259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1988) Mineral nutrition and spatial concentration of African ungulates. Nature 334:343–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1990) Mineral nutrition and seasonal movements of African migratory ungulates. Nature 345:613–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Georgiadis NJ (1986) Ecology of African grazing and browsing mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:39–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Ruess RW, Seagle SW (1988) Large mammals and process dynamics in African ecosystems: herbivorous mammals affect primary productivity and regulate recycling balances. Bioscience 38:794–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Banyikwa FF, McNaughton MM (1997) Promotion of the cycling of diet-enhancing nutrients by African grazers. Science 278:1798–1800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu JO, Dublin HT (2004) Spatial dynamics of lions along an environmental gradient. Afr J Ecol 42:8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu JO, Bhola N, Reid RS (2005) The effects of pastoralism and protection on the density and distribution of carnivores and their prey in the Mara ecosystem of Kenya. J Zool 265:281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu JO, Piepho H-P, Dublin HT, Reid RS, Bhola N (2006) Application of mark–recapture methods to lions: satisfying assumptions by using covariates to explain heterogeneity. J Zool 269:161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu JO, Piepho H-P, Dublin HT, Bhola N, Reid RS (2007) ENSO, rainfall, temperature and NDVI fluctuations in the Mara-Serengeti ecosystem. Afr J Ecol 46:132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu JO, Piepho H-P, Dublin HT, Bhola N, Reid RS (2009) Dynamics of Mara-Serengeti ungulates in relation to land use changes. J Zool 278:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu JO, Piepho H-P, Reid RS, Rainy ME, Kruska RL, Worden JS, Nyabenge M, Hobbs NT (2010) Large herbivore responses to water and settlements in savannas. Ecol Monogr 80:241–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (1996) Ecological guidelines for waterpoints in extensive protected areas. S Afr J Wildl Res 26:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (2008) Changing vulnerability to predation related to season and sex in an African ungulate assemblage. Oikos 117:602–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickup G, Chewings VH (1988) Estimating the distribution of grazing and the patterns of cattle movements in a large arid zone paddock—an approach using animal distribution patterns and LANDSAT imagery. Int J Remote Sensing 9:1469–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfern JV, Grant CC, Biggs HC, Getz WM (2003) Surface water constraints on herbivores foraging in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Ecology 84:2092–2107

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid RS, Rainy M, Ogutu JO, Kruska RL, Kimani K, Nyabenge M, McCartney M, Kshatriya M, Worden JS, Ng’ang’a L, Owuor J, Kinoti J, Njuguna E, Wilson CJ, Lamprey R (2003). People, wildlife and livestock in the Mara Ecosystem: the Mara Count 2002. Report, Mara Count 2002, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya. Available online at http://www.masaimaracount.org

  • Senzota RBM, Mtakho G (1990) Effect on wildlife of a water-hole in Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Afr J Ecol 28:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE (1975) The resource limitation of trophic levels in tropical grassland ecosystems. J Anim Ecol 44:497–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Mduma SAR, Brashares JS (2003) Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system. Nature 425:288–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traill LW (2004) Seasonal utilization of habitat by large grazing herbivores in semi-arid Zimbabwe. S Afr J Wildl Res 34:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Traill LW, Bigalke RC (2007) A presence-only habitat suitability model for large grazing African ungulates and its utility for wildlife management. Afr J Ecol 45:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MD, Hiernaux P (2002) The use of herder’s accounts to map livestock activities across agropastoral landscapes in semi-arid Africa. Landsc Ecol 17:367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valeix M (2012) Temporal dynamics of dry-season water-hole use by large African herbivores in two years of contrasting rainfall in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. J Trop Ecol 27:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valeix M, Loveridge AJ, Chamaille-Jammes S, Davidson Z, Murindagomo F, Fritz H, Macdonald DW (2009) Behavioral adjustments of African herbivores to predation risk by lions: spatiotemporal variations influence habitat use. Ecology 90:23–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verweij RJT, Verrelst J, Loth PE, Heitkonig IMA, Brunsting AMH (2006) Grazing lawns contribute to the subsistence of mesoherbivores on dystrophic savannas. Oikos 114:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Emslie RH, Owen-Smith RN, Scholes RJ (1987) To cull or not to cull: lessons from a Southern African drought. J Appl Ecol 24:381–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western D (1975) Water availability and its influence on the structure and dynamics of a savannah large mammal community. E Afr Wildl J 13:265–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SD (1998) Grevy’s zebra: ecology in a heterogeneous environment. PhD Thesis, University of London

  • Wilmshurst JF, Fryxell JM, Bergman CM (2000) The allometry of patch selection in ruminants. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 267:345–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolanski E, Gereta E, Borner M, Mduma SAR (1999) Water, migration and the Serengeti ecosystem. Am Sci 87:526–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The data were collected by 22 vehicle- and 3 aircraft-counting teams, 20 organisations and 84 individuals in 1999 and 2002 (see http://www.masaimaracount.org for details). We thank the Mara pastoral communities, Narok County Council, Mara Conservancy and Mara Wildlife Trusts for help and permission to conduct the counts. We also thank M. McCartney and Campfire Conservation, J. Rainy, K. Kimani and C. Wilson for scientific and logistical support. Drs. Norman Owen-Smith, Ian Gordon, Andrew Illius, John F. Wilmshurst and Jan de Leeuw made useful suggestions that helped improve this paper. This research was funded by ILRI’s 37 core donors, a grant from the US National Science Foundation (DEB 0342820) and the Belgian Government (DGIC BEL011). JO Ogutu was supported by an Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Research Fellowship at the Institute of Crop Science, Bioinformatics Unit, University of Hohenheim, Germany. The field sampling complied with the current laws of Kenya.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph O. Ogutu.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogutu, J.O., Reid, R.S., Piepho, HP. et al. Large herbivore responses to surface water and land use in an East African savanna: implications for conservation and human-wildlife conflicts. Biodivers Conserv 23, 573–596 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0617-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0617-y

Keywords

Navigation