Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 11, pp 2997–3016

Differing responses to landscape change: implications for small mammal assemblages in forest fragments

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9621-7

Cite this article as:
Holland, G.J. & Bennett, A.F. Biodivers Conserv (2009) 18: 2997. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9621-7


Human modification of landscapes typically results in many species being confined to small, isolated and degraded habitat fragments. While fragment size and isolation underpin many studies of modified landscapes, vegetation characteristics are less frequently incorporated. The relative influence of biogeographic (e.g. size, isolation) and vegetation parameters on assemblages is poorly understood, but critical for conservation management. In this study, a multiple hypothesis testing framework was used to determine the relative importance of biogeographic and vegetation parameters in explaining the occurrence of an assemblage of small mammals in 48 forest fragments in an agricultural landscape in south-eastern Australia. Fragment size and vegetation characteristics were consistently important predictors of occurrence across species. In contrast, fragment isolation was important for just one native species. Differing abilities of species to move through the landscape provide a reasonable explanation for these results. We conclude that for effective conservation of assemblages, it is important to: (1) consider differing responses of species to landscape change, and (2) move beyond a focus primarily on spatial attributes (size, isolation) to recognise that landscape change also has profound effects on habitat composition and quality.


Australia Functional connectivity Habitat fragmentation Mammals Patch size Patch isolation Species richness Vegetation characteristics 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Landscape Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental SciencesDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations