Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 317–328

The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity

Authors

    • Department of Biological SciencesNational University of Singapore
  • Mary Rose C. Posa
    • Department of Biological SciencesNational University of Singapore
  • Tien Ming Lee
    • Ecology, Behavior and Evolution Section, Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of California, San Diego
  • David Bickford
    • Department of Biological SciencesNational University of Singapore
  • Lian Pin Koh
    • Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyPrinceton University
    • Institute of Terrestrial EcosystemsETH Zürich
  • Barry W. Brook
    • Research Institute for Climate Change and Sustainability, School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Adelaide
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9607-5

Cite this article as:
Sodhi, N.S., Posa, M.R.C., Lee, T.M. et al. Biodivers Conserv (2010) 19: 317. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9607-5

Abstract

Southeast Asia is a region of conservation concern due to heavy losses of its native habitats. In this overview, we highlight the conservation importance of Southeast Asia by comparing its degree of species endemism and endangerment, and its rate of deforestation with other tropical regions (i.e., Meso-America, South America, and Sub-Saharan Africa). Southeast Asia contains the highest mean proportion of country-endemic bird (9%) and mammal species (11%). This region also has the highest proportion of threatened vascular plant, reptile, bird, and mammal species. Furthermore, not only is Southeast Asia’s annual deforestation rate the highest in the tropics, but it has also increased between the periods 1990–2000 and 2000–2005. This could result in projected losses of 13–85% of biodiversity in the region by 2100. Secondary habitat restoration, at least in certain countries, would allow for some amelioration of biodiversity loss and thus potentially lower the currently predicted extinction rates. Nonetheless, urgent conservation actions are needed. Conservation initiatives should include public education, sustaining livelihoods, and ways to enhance the sustainability of agriculture and increase the capacity of conservation institutions. Furthermore, these actions should be country-specific and not ignore areas heavily populated by humans, as they can also harbour high numbers of threatened species. We urge that cooperative conservation initiatives be undertaken and support (e.g., capacity-building) be given by more developed countries in the region and beyond.

Keywords

ExtinctionsEndangered speciesDeforestationHabitat lossSpecies–area relationship

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009