Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The extent and continued expansion of urbanisation has focused attention on the significance for native biodiversity of those green spaces remaining within such areas and the most appropriate methods of managing them. In the UK, a high proportion of urban space is comprised of the private or domestic gardens associated with residential dwellings, and many recommendations have been made for simple changes to improve their value for biodiversity (‘wildlife gardening’). Here, we report the results of replicated experimental tests of five such common recommendations, involving the introduction to gardens of (i) artificial nest sites for solitary bees and wasps; (ii) artificial nest sites for bumblebees; (iii) small ponds; (iv) dead wood for fungi and other saproxylic organisms; and (v) patches of nettles Urtica dioica L. for butterfly larvae. The broad conclusion is that whilst some methods for increasing the biodiversity of garden environments may be very effective, others have a low probability of success on the timescales and spatial scales likely to be acceptable to many garden owners. If one of the functions of small scale biodiversity enhancement is to develop and encourage awareness of biodiversity and its conservation, then encouragement to conduct particular activities must be balanced with a realistic appraisal of their likely success.
- Anonymous 2001. Cambridge garden watch survey 2001: final report. Privately circulated.
- Ansell R., Baker P. and Harris S. 2001. The value of gardens for wildlife — lessons from mammals and herpetofauna. British Wildlife 13: 77–84.
- Asher J., Warren M., Fox R., Harding P., Jeffcoate G. and Jeffcoate S. 2001. The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
- Baines C. 1985. How to Make a Wildlife Garden. Elm Tree Books, London.
- Baines C. 2000. How to Make a Wildlife Garden. Frances Lincoln, London.
- Boothby J., Hull A.P., Jeffreys D.A. and Small R.W. 1995. Wetland loss in north-west England: the conservation and management of ponds in Cheshire. In: Hughes J.M.R. and Heathwaite A.L. (eds) Hydrology and Hydrochemistry of British Wetlands. John Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 431–444.
- Chinery M. 1977. The Natural History of the Garden. Collins, London.
- Davis B.N.K. 1975. The colonization of isolated patches of nettles (Urtica dioica L.) by insects. Journal of Applied Ecology 12: 1–14.
- Doncaster C.P. 1994. Factors regulating local variations in abundance: field tests on hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Oikos 69: 182–192.
- Free J.B. and Butler C.G. 1959. Bumblebees. Collins, London.
- Fry R. and Lonsdale D. 1991. Gardens. In: Fry R. and Lonsdale D. (eds) Habitat Conservation for Insects — A Neglected Green Issue. The Amateur Entomologists’ Society, Middlesex, UK, pp. 179–187.
- Fussell M. and Corbet S.A. 1992. Flower usage by bumblebees — a basis for forage plant management. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 451–465.
- Fye R.E. and Medler J.T. 1954. Field domiciles for bumblebees. Journal of Economic Entomology 47: 75–82.
- Gibbons B. and Gibbons L. 1988. Creating a Wildlife Garden. Hamlyn, London.
- Goulson D., Hughes W.O.H., Derwent L.C. and Stout J.C. 2002. Colony growth of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, in improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats. Oecologia 130: 267–273.
- Gregory R.D. and Baillie S.R. 1998. Large-scale habitat use of some declining British birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 785–799
- Haines-Young R.H., Barr C.J., Black H.I.J., Briggs D.J., Bunce R.G.H., Clarke R.T. et al. 2000. Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the UK Countryside. DETR, London.
- Harris S. 2002. Mammals in your garden? BBC Wildlife 20: 40–48.
- Hill F. 1996. Wildlife Gardening. Derbyshire Wildlife Trust, Derby, UK.
- JNCC 2001. UK Biodiversity. http://www.ukbap.org.uk.
- Kells A.R. and Goulson D. 2003. Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK. Biological Conservation 109: 165–174. CrossRef
- Knight M. 1954. Bird Gardening: How to Attract Birds. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
- Krombein K.V. 1967. Trap-nesting Wasps and Bees: Life Histories, Nests, and Associates. Smithsonian Press, Washington, DC.
- Kruess A. and Tscharntke T. 2002. Grazing intensity and the diversity of grasshoppers, butterflies, and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conservation Biology 16: 1570–1580.
- MacFarlane R.P., Griffen R.P. et al. 1983. Bumblebee management options to improve ‘Grasslands Pawera’ red clover seed yields. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 44: 47–53.
- Mason C.F. 2000. Thrushes now largely restricted to the built environment in eastern England. Diversity and Distributions 6: 189–194.
- Miotk P. 1996. The naturalized garden — a refuge for animals? — first results. Zoologischer Anzeiger 235: 101–116.
- Moore N.W. 1990. From arable farm to new town: changes in flora and fauna during the development of Bar Hill, Cambridgeshire, from 1966 to 1988. Nature in Cambridgeshire 32: 27–58.
- Moss S. and Cottridge D. 1998. Attracting Birds to Your Garden. New Holland, London.
- Munn P. 1998. Helping bumble bees with Bombus nest boxes. Bee World 79: 44–48.
- Norgaard Holm S. 1966. The utilisation and management of bumblebees for red clover and alfalfa seed production. Annual Review of Entomology 11: 155–182.
- O’Toole C. 1992. DIY for bees, homes for the loners. BBC Wildlife 10: 37.
- O’Toole C. 2000. The Red Mason Bee: Taking the Sting out of Bee-keeping. Osmia Publications, Banbury, UK.
- O’ Toole C. 2002. Bumblebees. Osmia Publications, Banbury, UK.
- Owen J. 1991. The Ecology of a Garden: The First Fifteen Years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- Packham C. 2001. Chris Packham’s Back Garden Nature Reserve. New Holland, London.
- Perrin R.M. 1975. The role of perennial stinging nettle, Urtica dioica, as a reservoir of beneficial natural enemies. Annals of Applied Biology 81: 289–297. CrossRef
- Plantlife 2001. Common Plants Survey 2000. Plantlife, London.
- Prŷs-Jones O.E. and Corbet S.A. 1991. Bumblebees. 2nd edn. Richmond Publishing, Slough, UK.
- Richards K.W. 1973. Biology of Bombus polaris Curtis and B hyperboreus Schonherr at Lake Hazen, Northwest Territories (Hymenoptera: Bombinii). Quaestiones Entomologicae 9: 115–157.
- Richards K.W. 1978. Nest-site selection by bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. Canadian Entomologist 110: 301–318. CrossRef
- Sheffield City Council 1991. Sheffield Nature Conservation Strategy. Departments of Land and Planning and City Museums, Sheffield City Council, Sheffield, UK.
- Soper T. 1975. The New Bird Table Book. Pan, London.
- Steffan-Dewenter I. 2002. Landscape context affects trap-nesting bees, wasps, and their natural enemies. Ecological Entomology 27: 631–637.
- Svensson B.G. and Lundberg H. 1977. Distribution of bumble bee nests in a subalpine/alpine area in relation to altitude and habitat (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Zoon 5: 63–72.
- Swan M.J.S. and Oldham R.S. 1993. Herptile Sites Volume 1: National Amphibian Survey Final Report. English Nature Research Report No. 38. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.
- Thomas J. and Lewington R. 1991. The Butterflies of Britain and Ireland. Dorling Kindersley, London.
- Thompson K., Austin K.C., Smith R.H., Warren P.H. and Gaston K.J., 2003. Urban domestic gardens I: putting local garden diversity in context. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 71–78.
- Tscharntke T., Gathmann A. and Steffan-Dewenter I., 1998. Bioindication using trap-nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies: community structure and interactions. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 708–719.
- Vickery M. 1992. Garden stinging nettle survey. Butterfly Conservation News 50: 21–23.
- Vickery M.L. 1995. Gardens: the neglected habitat. In: Pullin A.S. (ed) Butterfly Conservation and Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 123–134.
- Zabel J. and Tscharntke T. 1998. Does fragmentation of Urtica habitats affect phytophagous and predatory insects differently? Oecologia 116: 419–425.
- Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity
Biodiversity & Conservation
Volume 14, Issue 2 , pp 395-413
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Domestic gardens
- Land use
- Industry Sectors