Biological Invasions

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 977–979

The end of Invasion Biology: intellectual debate does not equate to nonsensical science

  • Jacques Blondel
  • Benjamin Hoffmann
  • Franck Courchamp
Perspectives and Paradigms

DOI: 10.1007/s10530-013-0560-6

Cite this article as:
Blondel, J., Hoffmann, B. & Courchamp, F. Biol Invasions (2014) 16: 977. doi:10.1007/s10530-013-0560-6


Valéry et al. recently proposed to end the field of Invasion Biology on the grounds that it is based on an inadequate definition of the concept of biological invasion and that, as exotic species, native species should also be called invasive whenever they outbreak. We argue, on the contrary, that the sudden demographic dominance of native species cannot be termed invasion. Moreover, we claim that the suggestion of ending a fruitful and useful discipline because it does not conform to a subjective definition or because it still encompasses some debatable ideas and unresolved questions is both irrelevant and excessive. We believe that the thousands of researchers working in this discipline do not perform nonsensical science, and that their efforts to understand and limit biological invasions are compatible with debating on the key concept of that field.


Invasion biologyOutbreakDemographic dominanceAlien invasive species

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Blondel
    • 1
  • Benjamin Hoffmann
    • 2
  • Franck Courchamp
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et EvolutiveCNRSMontpellier cedexFrance
  2. 2.Ecosystem SciencesCSIROWinnellieAustralia
  3. 3.Ecologie, Systématique & Evolution UMR CNRS 8079Univ Paris SudOrsay CedexFrance