Does Darwin’s Naturalization Hypothesis Explain Fish Invasions?
- Anthony RicciardiAffiliated withRedpath Museum, McGill University Email author
- , Miriam MottiarAffiliated withRedpath Museum, McGill University
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis predicts that introduced species tend not to invade areas containing congeneric native species, because they would otherwise compete with their close relatives and would likely encounter predators and pathogens that can attack them. An opposing view is that introduced species should succeed in areas where native congeners are present because they are more likely to share traits that pre-adapt them to their new environment. A test of both these hypotheses using data on fish introductions from several independent regions fails to support either viewpoints. In contrast to studies of nonindigenous plants, our results suggest that taxonomic affiliation is not an important general predictor of fish invasion success.
Keywordsbiotic resistance colonization exotic species invasion success nonindigenous species prediction
- Does Darwin’s Naturalization Hypothesis Explain Fish Invasions?
Volume 8, Issue 6 , pp 1403-1407
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- biotic resistance
- exotic species
- invasion success
- nonindigenous species
- Industry Sectors