, 7:279

Contentious terminology and complicated cartography of anti-aging medicine


DOI: 10.1007/s10522-006-9016-z

Cite this article as:
Mykytyn, C.E. Biogerontology (2006) 7: 279. doi:10.1007/s10522-006-9016-z


Serving as an introduction to the cultural significance of the contemporary emergence of anti-aging medicine, this article outlines some of the distinctions and controversies regarding the usage of the term “anti-aging medicine.” By sketching out the complex field of researchers, practitioners, organizations, companies it is clear that “anti-aging medicine” is a highly contentious term that means different things to different groups. Thus, analysis demands a keen attention to contextualizing its usage. However, despite the critically important distinctions in how “anti-aging medicine” is used and what it connotes both to the user and the audience, the core principle of anti-aging is the notion that aging can be targeted for biomedical intervention. It is the orientation toward this explicit goal that marks anti-aging medicine. While neither advocating for/against anti-aging medicine nor excavating the large body of biological literature, this ethnographically researched article explicates the cultural use of “anti-aging medicine” and maps out its main varieties, controversies, stakes, and challenges.


AgingAnti-aging medicineAnthropology/ethnographyScientific controversy



The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine


Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaHighland ParkUSA