Are Mathematical Theories Reducible to Non-analytic Foundations?
- Stathis Livadas
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this article I intend to show that certain aspects of the axiomatical structure of mathematical theories can be, by a phenomenologically motivated approach, reduced to two distinct types of idealization, the first-level idealization associated with the concrete intuition of the objects of mathematical theories as discrete, finite sign-configurations and the second-level idealization associated with the intuition of infinite mathematical objects as extensions over constituted temporality. This is the main standpoint from which I review Cantor’s conception of infinite cardinalities and also the metatheoretical content of some later well-known theorems of mathematical foundations. These are, the Skolem-Löwenheim Theorem which, except for its importance as such, it is also chosen for an interpretation of the associated metatheoretical paradox (Skolem Paradox), and Gödel’s (first) incompleteness result which, notwithstanding its obvious influence in the mathematical foundations, is still open to philosophical inquiry. On the phenomenological level, first-level and second-level idealizations, as above, are associated respectively with intentional acts carried out in actual present and with certain modes of a temporal constitution process.
- Are Mathematical Theories Reducible to Non-analytic Foundations?
Volume 23, Issue 1 , pp 109-135
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Axiom of Choice
- First-level idealization
- Gödel’s incompleteness theorems
- Second-level idealization
- Skolem-Löwenheim Theorem
- Stathis Livadas (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Messologgiou 66, Patras, 26222, Greece