, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 147–169

The Expressional Limits of Formal Language in the Notion of Quantum Observation


Invited paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10516-011-9168-6

Cite this article as:
Livadas, S. Axiomathes (2012) 22: 147. doi:10.1007/s10516-011-9168-6


In this article I deal with the notion of observation, from a phenomenologically motivated point of view, and its representation mainly by means of the formal language of quantum mechanics. In doing so, I have taken the notion of observation in two diverse contexts. In one context as a notion related with objects of a logical-mathematical theory taken as registered facts of phenomenological perception (Wahrnehmung) inasmuch as this phenomenological idea can also be linked with a process of measurement on the quantum-mechanical level. In another context I have taken it as connected with a notion of temporal constitution basically as it is described in E. Husserl’s texts on the phenomenology of temporal consciousness. Given that mathematical objects as formal-ontological objects can be thought of as abstractions of perceptual objects by means of categorial intuition, the question is whether and under what theoretical assumptions we can, in principle, include quantum objects in abstraction in the class of formal-ontological objects and thus inquire on the limits of their description within a formal-axiomatical theory. On the one hand, I derive an irreducibility on the level of individuals taken in formal representation as syntactical atoms-substrates without any further content and on the other hand a transcendental subjectivity of consciousness objectified as a self-constituted temporal unity upon which it is ultimately grounded the possibility of generation of an abstract predicative universe of discourse.


Ego of consciousnessIndividualIntentionalityNon-separabilityQuantum measurementQuantum objectTemporal continuum

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011