Abstract
Using nationally representative data from the 2005–2006 U.S. National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, this study queried relationship, sexual, and sex hormone patterns among married evangelical women and men aged 57–85, relative to those in other religions. Results suggested that despite potentially more unequal gender roles, evangelical older women may have better marital quality, perhaps due to the recent transformation of their male counterparts into authoritative, yet-supportive, “soft patriarchs.” Correspondingly, these women, especially those with greater subjective religiosity or more support from a spouse, reported consistently better sexual outcomes than their counterparts in other religions. In addition, they also had lower estradiol, whether due to psychobiological effects of their better relationships or self-selection of those with differential hormone levels into particular partnership patterns. While older men in these communities also experienced more satisfactory marriages, and had lower androgens (testosterone, DHEA), their relational assets were less uniformly matched by better sexual outcomes, perhaps reflecting a gender disparity in the linkage between these factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2009). Variation in testosterone levels and male reproductive effort: Insight from a polygynous human population. Hormones and Behavior, 56, 491–497.
Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.
Avis, N. E., Zhao, X., Johannes, C. B., Ory, M., Brockwell, S., & Greendale, G. A. (2005). Correlates of sexual function among multi-ethnic middle-aged women: Results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause, 12, 385–398.
Bancroft, J., Graham, C. A., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. A. (2009). The dual control model: Current status and future directions. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 121–142.
Bancroft, J., Herbenick, D., Barnes, T., Hallam-Jones, R., Wylie, K., Janssen, E., et al. (2005). The relevance of the dual control model to male sexual dysfunction: The Kinsey Institute/BASRT Collaborative Project. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 13–30.
Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 571–579.
Bancroft, J., Loftus, J., & Long, J. S. (2003). Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 193–208.
Bartkowski, J. P. (1999). One step forward, one step back: “Progressive traditionalism” and the negotiation of domestic labor in evangelical families. Gender Issues, 17, 37–61.
Bartkowski, J. P. (2001). Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bartkowski, J. P., Wilcox, W. B., & Ellison, C. G. (2000). Charting the paradoxes of evangelical family life: Gender and parenting in conservative Protestant households. Family Ministry, 14, 9–21.
Basson, R. (2001). Human sex-response cycles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 33–43.
Basson, R. (2005). Women’s sexual dysfunction: Revised and expanded definitions. Candian Medical Association Journal, 172, 1327–1333.
Basson, R. (2008). Women’s sexual function and dysfunction: Current uncertainties, future directions. International Journal of Impotence Research, 20, 466–478.
Basson, R., Althof, S., Davis, S., Fugl-Meyer, K., Goldstein, I., Leiblum, S., et al. (2004). Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 1, 24–34.
Basson, R., Berman, J., Burnett, A., Derogatis, L., Ferguson, D., Fourcroy, J., et al. (2000). Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: Definitions and classifications. Journal of Urology, 163, 888–893.
Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570–581.
Blanchard, K., Goyer, T., & Hodges, P. (2013). Lead your family like Jesus: Powerful parenting principles from the creator of families. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House.
Bogaert, A. F., & Fisher, W. A. (1995). Predictors of university men’s number of sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 119–130.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–136.
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & McKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 373–383.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
Das, A., Laumann, E. O., & Waite, L. J. (2012). Sexual expression over the life course: Results from three landmark surveys. In J. DeLamater & L. Carpenter (Eds.), Sex for life: From virginity to Viagra, how sexuality changes throughout our lives (pp. 236–259). New York: New York University Press.
Dennerstein, L., Dudley, E., & Burger, H. (2001). Are changes in sexual functioning during midlife due to aging or menopause? Fertility and Sterility, 76, 456–460.
Dennerstein, L., Randolph, J., Taffe, J., Dudley, E., & Burger, H. (2002). Hormones, mood, sexuality, and the menopausal transition. Fertility and Sterility, 77, S42–S48.
Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., & Hackett, G. I. (1999). Association of sexual problems with social, psychological, and physical problems in men and women: A cross sectional population survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53, 144–148.
Durante, K. M., & Li, N. P. (2009). Oestradiol level and opportunistic mating in women. Biology Letters, 5, 179–182.
Ellison, C. G., Bartkowski, J. P., & Anderson, K. L. (1999). Are there religious variations in domestic violence? Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87–113.
England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment and gender. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Erickson, R. J. (1993). Reconceptualizing family work: The effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 888–900.
Gallagher, S. (2003). Evangelical identity and gendered family life. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Gavrilova, N., & Lindau, S. T. (2009). Salivary sex hormone measurement in a national, population-based study of older adults. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i94–i105.
Giles, K. R., & McCabe, M. P. (2009). Conceptualizing women’s sexual function: Linear vs. circular models of sexual response. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 2761–2771.
Glass, J., & Jacobs, J. (2005). Childhood religious conservatism and adult attainment among black and white women. Social Forces, 84, 555–579.
Granger, D. A., Kivlighan, K. T., Fortunato, C., Harmon, A. G., Hibel, L. C., Schwartz, et al. (2007). Integration of salivary biomarkers into developmental and behaviorally-oriented research: Problems and solutions for collecting specimens. Physiology & Behavior, 92, 583–590.
Gray, P. B. (2003). Marriage, parenting, and testosterone variation among Kenyan Swahili men. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 122, 279–286.
Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74, 1029–1042.
Hegstrom, P. (2004). Angry men and the women who love them: Breaking the cycle of physical and emotional abuse. Kansas City, KS: Beacon Hill Press.
Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
Hunter, J. D. (1987). Evangelicalism: The coming generation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keller, T. (2011). The meaning of marriage: Facing the complexities of commitment with the wisdom of God. New York: Dutton Adult.
King, M., Holt, V., & Nazareth, I. (2007). Women’s views of their sexual difficulties: Agreement and disagreement with clinical diagnoses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 281–288.
Laumann, E. O., Das, A., & Waite, L. J. (2008). Sexual dysfunction among older adults: Prevalence and risk factors from a nationally representative U.S. probability sample of men and women 57-85 years of age. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 2300–2311.
Leiblum, S. (2001). Critical overview of the new consensus classifications and definitions of female sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 159–169.
Lindau, S. T., Schumm, L. P., Laumann, E. O., Levinson, W., O’Muircheartaigh, C. A., & Waite, L. J. (2007). A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 762–774.
Lue, T., Basson, R., Rosen, R., Guiliano, F., Khoury, S., & Montorsi, F. (2004). Sexual medicine: Sexual dysfunction in men and women. Paris: Health Publications.
Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McCabe, M., Althof, S. E., Assalian, P., Chevret-Measson, M., Leiblum, S. R., Simonelli, C., et al. (2010). Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 327–336.
McCartney, B., Trent, J. T., & Smalley, G. (1992). What makes a man?: Twelve promises that will change your life!. Colorado Springs, CO: Navpress Publishing Group.
McQuillan, J., & Ferree, M. M. (1998). The importance of variation among men and the benefits of feminism for families. In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make? (pp. 213–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507.
Miller, D. E. (1997). Reinventing American Protestantism: Christianity in the new millennium. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Niebuhr, G. (1998, June 10). Southern Baptists declare wife should ‘submit’ to her husband. New York Times.
Nock, S. L. (2001). The marriages of equally dependent spouses. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 755–775.
O’Muircheartaigh, C., Eckman, S., & Smith, S. (2009). Statistical design and estimation for the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i12–i19.
Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Testosterone is associated with mating success but not attractiveness or masculinity in human males. Animal Behaviour, 76, 297–303.
Pinckney, C. (1997). What is Christian marriage? (sermon) Community Bible Church: Williamstown, MA. Retrieved from http://tcpiii.tripod.com/marriage2.htm
Pitkin, J., & Rees, M. (2008). Urogenital atrophy. Menopause International, 14, 136–137.
Pollet, T. V., der Meij, L. V., Cobey, K. D., & Buunk, A. P. (2011). Testosterone levels and their associations with lifetime number of opposite sex partners and remarriage in a large sample of American elderly men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 72–77.
Qato, D. M., Schumm, L. P., Johnson, M., Mihai, A., & Lindau, S. T. (2009). Medication data collection and coding in a home-based survey of older adults. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i86–i93.
Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2008). Women’s estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men’s testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 14–19.
Roney, J. R., Simmons, Z. L., & Gray, P. B. (2011). Changes in estradiol predict within-women shifts in attraction to facial cues of men’s testosterone. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 742–749.
Roof, W. C. (1993). A generation of seekers: The spiritual journeys of the Baby Boom generation. New York: Harper Collins.
Rosen, R. C., & Laumann, E. O. (2003). The prevalence of sexual problems in women: How valid are comparisons across studies? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 209–211.
Sayer, L. C., & Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Women’s economic independence and the probability of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 906–943.
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.
Smith, S., Jaszczak, A., Graber, J., Lundeen, K., Leitsch, S., Wargo, E., et al. (2009). Instrument development, study design implementation, and survey conduct for the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i20–i29.
Spalding, J. D. (1996). Bonding in the bleachers: A visit to the Promise Keepers. The Christian Century, 113, 260–265.
Stata Corp. (2011). STATA Release 12.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Shibley, M. A. (1996). Resurgent evangelicalism in the United States: Mapping cultural change since 1970. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.
van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in North American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 454–459.
Waite, L. J., Laumann, E. O., Das, A., & Schumm, L. P. (2009). Sexuality: Measures of partnerships, practices, attitudes, and problems in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Study. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i56–i66.
Wilcox, W. B. (1998). Conservative protestant childrearing: Authoritarian or authoritative? American Sociological Review, 63, 796–809.
Wilcox, W. B. (2004). Soft patriarchs, new men: How Christianity shapes fathers and husbands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wilcox, W. B. (2006). Religion and the domestication of men. Contexts, 5, 42–46.
Wilcox, W. B., & Nock, S. L. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 1321–1345.
Wilcox, W. B., & Wolfinger, N. H. (2007). Then comes marriage? Religion, race, and marriage in urban America. Social Science Research, 36, 569–589.
Wilcox, W. B., & Wolfinger, N. H. (2008). Living and loving “decent”: Religion and relationship quality among urban parents. Social Science Research, 37, 828–843.
Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 577–594.
Williams, S. R., Pham-Kanter, G., & Leitsch, S. A. (2009). Measures of chronic conditions and diseases associated with aging in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Journals of Gerontology—Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i67–i75.
Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M., Jr, & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.
Wolfinger, N. H., & Wilcox, W. B. (2008). Happily ever after? Religion, marital status, gender and relationship quality in urban families. Social Forces, 86, 1311–1337.
Wylie, K., Rees, M., Hackett, G., Anderson, R., Bouloux, P.-M., Cust, M., et al. (2010). Androgens, health and sexuality in women and men. Human Fertility, 13, 277–297.
Yerkovich, M., & Yerkovich, K. (2008). How we love: A revolutionary approach to deeper connections in marriage. Colorado Springs, CO: WaterBrook Press.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture grant No. 2013-NP-169294. We thank the Editor and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, A., Nairn, S. Conservative Christianity, Partnership, Hormones, and Sex in Late Life. Arch Sex Behav 43, 1403–1415 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0273-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0273-7