Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 377–385

Gender Identities and Gender Dysphoria in the Netherlands

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10508-013-0140-y

Cite this article as:
Kuyper, L. & Wijsen, C. Arch Sex Behav (2014) 43: 377. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0140-y

Abstract

Several studies estimate the prevalence of gender dysphoria among adults by examining the number of individuals turning to health services. Since individuals might be hesitant to seek medical care related to gender dysphoria, these studies could underestimate the prevalence. The studies also lack information regarding the variance among different aspects of gender dysphoric conditions. Therefore, the current study estimated the prevalence by examining self-reported gender identity and dysphoria in a Dutch population sample (N = 8,064, aged 15–70 years old). Three measures assessed aspects of gender dysphoria: gender identity, dislike of the natal female/male body, and wish to obtain hormones/sex reassignment surgery. Results showed that 4.6 % of the natal men and 3.2 % of the natal women reported an ambivalent gender identity (equal identification with other sex as with sex assigned at birth) and 1.1 % of the natal men and 0.8 % of the natal women reported an incongruent gender identity (stronger identification with other sex as with sex assigned at birth). Lower percentages reported a dislike of their natal body and/or a wish for hormones/surgery. Combining these figures estimated the percentage of men reporting an ambivalent or incongruent gender identity combined with a dislike of their male body and a wish to obtain hormones/surgery at 0.6 %. For women, this was 0.2 %. These novel findings show that studies based on the number of individuals seeking medical care might underestimate the prevalence of gender dysphoria. Furthermore, the findings argue against a dichotomous approach to gender dysphoria.

Keywords

Gender identity disorder Gender dysphoria Transsexuality Transgender Sex reassignment surgery 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Netherlands Institute for Social ResearchThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Research DepartmentRutgers WPFUtrechtThe Netherlands