Effects of a Tattoo on Men’s Behavior and Attitudes Towards Women: An Experimental Field Study
- Nicolas Guéguen
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Previous studies have indicated negative evaluations of women with tattoos. However, a study by Swami and Furnham (2007) showed that tattooed women were rated as less physically attractive but more sexually promiscuous. Given that men interpret women’s sexual intent according to their physical appearance, we predicted that women with tattoos would be more favorably approached by men. A temporary tattoo was placed on confederates’ lower back, or not, and all confederates were instructed to read a book while lying flat on their stomach on a well-known beach. Two experiments were conducted. The first experiment showed that more men (N = 220) approached the tattooed confederates and that the mean latency of their approach was quicker. A second experiment showed that men (N = 440) estimated to have more chances to have a date and to have sex on the first date with tattooed confederates. However, the level of physical attractiveness attributed to the confederate was not influenced by the tattoo condition. These results were discussed with respect to men’s possible misinterpretation of women wearing tattoos and the risks associated with this misinterpretation.
- Abbey, A. (1987). Misperception of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173–194. CrossRef
- Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Harnish, R. J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 108–126. CrossRef
- Armstrong, M. L. (1991). Career-oriented women with tattoos. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23, 215–230. CrossRef
- Beck, S. B., Ward-Hull, C. I., & McLear, P. M. (1976). Variables related to women’s somatic preferences of the male and female body. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1200–1210. CrossRef
- Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. CrossRef
- Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. CrossRef
- Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278. CrossRef
- Cash, T. F., Dawson, K., Davis, P., Bowen, M., & Galumbeck, C. (1989). Effects of cosmetics use on the physical attractiveness and body image of American college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 349–355. CrossRef
- Danel, D., & Pawlowski, B. (2006). Attractiveness of men’s faces in relation to women’s phase of menstrual cycle. Collegium Antropologicum, 30, 285–289.
- Degelman, D., & Price, N. D. (2002). Tattoos and ratings of personal characteristics. Psychological Reports, 90, 507–514. CrossRef
- Edmonds, E. M., & Cahoon, D. D. (1984). Female clothes preference related to male sexual interest. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 171–173. CrossRef
- Furnham, A., Hester, C., & Weir, C. (1990). Sex differences in the preferences for specific female body shapes. Sex Roles, 22, 743–754. CrossRef
- Furnham, A., Lavancy, M., & McClelland, A. (2001). Waist to hip ratio and facial attractiveness: A pilot study. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 491–502. CrossRef
- Gitter, G. A., Lomranz, J., Saxe, L., & Bar-Tal, Y. (1983). Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 7–13. CrossRef
- Greer, A. E., & Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 185–201. CrossRef
- Guéguen, N. (2007a). Women’s bust size and men’s courtship solicitation. Body Image, 4, 386–390. CrossRef
- Guéguen, N. (2007b). Bust size and hitchhiking: A field study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 1294–1298. CrossRef
- Guéguen, N. (2008). The effects of women’s cosmetics on men’s courtship behavior. North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 221–228.
- Guéguen, N. (2011a). Pourquoi faut-il sourire lorsque l’on n’est pas beau? Paris: Dunod.
- Guéguen, N. (2011b). The effect of women’s suggestive clothing on men’s behavior and judgment: A field study. Psychological Reports, 109, 635–638. CrossRef
- Guéguen, N. (2012a). Tattoos, piercings, and alcohol consumption. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 1253–1256.
- Guéguen, N. (2012b). Tattoos, piercings, and sexual activity. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 1543–1547.
- Guéguen, N. (2012c). Color and women hitchhikers’ attractiveness: Gentlemen drivers prefer red. Color Research and Application. doi:10.002/col.20651.
- Guéguen, N. (2012d). Color and women’s attractiveness: When red clothed women are perceived to have more intense sexual intent. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 261–265.
- Guéguen, N., & Lamy, L. (2009). Hitchhiking women’s hair color. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109, 941–948. CrossRef
- Hawkes, D., Seen, C. Y., & Thorn, C. (2004). Factors that influence attitudes toward women with tattoos. Sex Roles, 50, 593–604. CrossRef
- Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness: Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501–513. CrossRef
- Hynie, M., Schuller, R. A., & Couperthwaite, L. (2003). Perceptions of sexual intent: The impact of condom possession. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 75–79. CrossRef
- Jacob, C., Guéguen, N., Boulbry, G., & Ardicioni, R. (2009). Waitresses’ facial cosmetics and tipping: A field experiment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 188–190. CrossRef
- Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969. CrossRef
- Koukounas, E., & Letch, N. M. (2001). Psychological correlates of perception of sexual intent in women. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 443–456. CrossRef
- Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955. CrossRef
- Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489. CrossRef
- Niesta Kayser, D., Elliot, A. J., & Feltman, R. (2010). Red and romantic behavior in men viewing women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 901–908. CrossRef
- Nowosielski, K., Sipinski, A., Kuczerawy, I., Kozłowska-Rup, D., & Skrzypulec-Plinta, V. (2012). Tattoos, piercing, and sexual behaviors in young adults. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 2307–2314. CrossRef
- Pazda, A. D., Elliott, A. J., & Greitemeyer, T. (2012). Sexy red: Perceived sexual receptivity mediates the red-attraction relation in men viewing woman. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 787–790. CrossRef
- Robert, T. A., & Ryan, S. A. (2002). Tattooing and high-risk behavior in adolescents. Pediatrics, 11, 1058–1063. CrossRef
- Seiter, J. S., & Hatch, S. (2005). Effect of tattoos on perceptions of credibility and attractiveness. Psychological Reports, 96, 1113–1120. CrossRef
- Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458. CrossRef
- Shotland, R. L., & Craig, J. M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior? Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 66–73. CrossRef
- Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of the waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307. CrossRef
- Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1995). Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of women’s attractiveness. Human Nature, 6, 51–65. CrossRef
- Smith, J., Gentry, J., & Chailland, C. (2006). Cosmetic expressions and sexuality: The relationship between body modifications and promiscuity. Hanover College. Available at http://vault.hanover.edu.
- Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481. CrossRef
- Swami, V., & Barrett, S. (2011). British men’s hair color preferences: An assessment of courtship solicitation and stimulus ratings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 595–600. CrossRef
- Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2007). Unattractive, promiscuous, and heavy drinkers: Perceptions of women with tattoos. Body Image, 4, 343–352. CrossRef
- Tiggeman, M., & Golder, F. (2006). Tattooing: An expression of uniqueness in the appearance domain. Body Image, 3, 309–315. CrossRef
- Wohlrab, S., Stahl, J., & Kappeler, P. M. (2007). Modifying the body: Motivations for getting tattooed and pierced. Body Image, 4, 87–95. CrossRef
- Effects of a Tattoo on Men’s Behavior and Attitudes Towards Women: An Experimental Field Study
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 42, Issue 8 , pp 1517-1524
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Physical attractiveness
- Sexual stereotypes
- Industry Sectors
- Nicolas Guéguen (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Business Department, Université de Bretagne-Sud, IMABS, rue de la loi, 56000, Vannes, France