What’s Wrong With Sex?
- Patrick Singy
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Several psychiatrists and psychologists have recently made important criticisms of specific diagnostic innovations proposed by the DSM-5’s Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Work Group (DeClue, 2009; Frances, 2010; Green, 2010; O’Donohue, 2010). As a historian and philosopher of science, my goal here is more general: I want to show that what this Work Group is trying to accomplish undermines the definitions of “paraphilia” and “mental disorder” that have been operative since the DSM-III. If the revisions proposed by the Work Group are implemented, the DSM-5 will be closer to the DSM-I and DSM-II than to their successors. In order to understand why this is so, we need first to take a short historical detour and to look at how “mental disorder” and “paraphilias” have traditionally been defined. Only then will we be in a position to grasp the magnitude of what the DSM-5 is trying to accomplish.
As is well known, the DSM-I (American Psychiatric Association, 1952) and DSM-II (American Psyc
- American Psychiatric Association. (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manua: Mental disorders. Washington, DC: Author.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
- Blanchard, R. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for Transvestic Fetishism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 363–372. CrossRef
- Cartwright, S. (1851). Report on the diseases and physical peculiarities of the Negro race. The New-Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal, 7, 691–715.
- DeClue, G. (2009). Should hebephilia be a mental disorder? A reply to Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 317–318. CrossRef
- Frances, A. (2010, March 17). DSM5 and sexual disorders—Just say no. Psychiatric Times.
- Green, R. (2010). Sexual preference for 14-year-olds as a mental disorder: You can’t be serious!! [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 585–586. CrossRef
- O’Donohue, W. (2010). A critique of the proposed DSM-V diagnosis of pedophilia [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 587–590. CrossRef
- Spitzer, R. L. (1999). Harmful dysfunction and the DSM definition of mental disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 430–432. CrossRef
- Thornton, D. (2010). Evidence regarding the need for a diagnostic category for a coercive paraphilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 411–418. CrossRef
- Wakefield, J. C. (1992). Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A conceptual critique of DSM-III- R’s definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review, 99, 232–247. CrossRef
- Wakefield, J. C., & First, M. B. (2003). Clarifying the distinction between disorder and nondisorder. In K. A. Phillips, M. B. First, & H. A. Pincus (Eds.), Advancing DSM: Dilemmas in psychiatric diagnosis (pp. 23–55). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
- Zucker, K. J. (2010, February 22). DSM5: Pandora replies to Dr Frances. Psychiatric Times.
- What’s Wrong With Sex?
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 39, Issue 6 , pp 1231-1233
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Patrick Singy (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Bioethics Program, Union Graduate College, 80 Nott Terrace, Schenectady, NY, 12308, USA