Should Hebephilia be a Mental Disorder? A Reply to Blanchard et al. (2008)
- Gregory DeClue
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Blanchard et al. (2008) suggest possibilities for expanding DSM to include a diagnosis for Hebephilia (mostly erotically attracted to 11- to 14-year olds), but they do not suggest the inclusion of a diagnosis for Ephebophilia (mostly attracted to 15- to 16-year olds), Teliophilia (mostly attracted to those 17 years old or older), or Gerontophilia (mostly attracted to the aged).
Although Blanchard et al. present data regarding whether reliable differences in erotic preference can be shown, they completely overlook the question of how we decide which sexual interest patterns should be considered a mental disorder. Pedophilia is a mental disorder. Homosexuality is not. Should Hebephilia or Ephebophilia or Gerontophilia be considered mental disorders? How about sexual preference for people with different (or with the same) ethnic characteristics as oneself?
The decision to classify a pattern of sexual attraction as a mental disorder (paraphilia) inevitably entails more than (1) reliable diff
- Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., et al. (2008). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9.
- Should Hebephilia be a Mental Disorder? A Reply to Blanchard et al. (2008)
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 38, Issue 3 , pp 317-318
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Gregory DeClue (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. 16443 Winburn Place, Sarasota, FL, 34240, USA