Sex Differences in Patterns of Genital Sexual Arousal: Measurement Artifacts or True Phenomena?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Sex differences in patterns of sexual arousal have been reported recently. Men’s genital arousal is typically more category-specific than women’s, such that men experience their greatest genital arousal to stimuli depicting their preferred sex partners whereas women experience significant genital arousal to stimuli depicting both their preferred and non-preferred sex partners. In addition, men’s genital and subjective sexual arousal patterns are more concordant than women’s: The correlation between genital and subjective sexual arousal is much larger in men than in women. These sex differences could be due to low response-specificity in the measurement of genital arousal in women. The most commonly used measure of female sexual arousal, vaginal photoplethysmography, has not been fully validated and may not measure sexual arousal specifically. A total of 20 men and 20 women were presented with various sexual and non-sexual emotionally laden short film clips while their genital and subjective sexual arousal were measured. Results suggest that vaginal photoplethysmography is a measure of sexual arousal exclusively. Women’s genital responses were highest during sexual stimuli and absent during all non-sexual stimuli. Sex differences in degree of category-specificity and concordance were replicated: Men’s genital responses were more category-specific than women’s and men’s genital and subjective sexual arousal were more strongly correlated than women’s. The results from the current study support the continued use of vaginal photoplethysmography in investigating sex differences in patterns of sexual arousal.
- Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., & Mavissakalian, M. (1975). Measurement of sexual arousal in male homosexuals: Effects of instructions and stimulus modality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 4, 623–629. CrossRef
- Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374. CrossRef
- Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118–126. CrossRef
- Chivers, M. L. (2005). A brief review and discussion of sex differences in the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 377–390. CrossRef
- Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biological Psychology, 70, 115–120. CrossRef
- Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744. CrossRef
- Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2008). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121. CrossRef
- Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2007). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal among men and women: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. C. J. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58–60. CrossRef
- Diamond, L. M. (2003). Was it a phase? Young women’s relinquishment of lesbian/bisexual identities over a 5-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 352–364. CrossRef
- Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517. CrossRef
- Fang, B. (1976). Swinging: In retrospect. Journal of Sex Research, 12, 220–237.
- Freund, K., Langevin, R., Cibiri, S., & Zajac, Y. (1973). Heterosexual aversion in homosexual males. British Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 163–169. CrossRef
- Geer, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The sexual response system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 315–341). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Geer, J. H., Morokoff, P., & Greenwood, P. (1974). Sexual arousal in women: The development of a measurement device for vaginal blood volume. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3, 559–564. CrossRef
- Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Earls, C. M. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4, 502–511. CrossRef
- Harrison, D. A., Bennett, W. H., Globetti, G., & Alsikafi, M. (1974). Premarital sexual standards of rural youth. Journal of Sex Research, 10, 266–277. CrossRef
- Hatch, J. P. (1979). Vaginal photoplethysmography: Methodological considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 8, 357–374. CrossRef
- Heiman, J. R. (1980). Female sexual response patterns: Interactions of physiological, affective, and contextual cues. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1311–1316.
- Hoon, P. W., Wincze, J. P., & Hoon, E. F. (1976). Physiological assessment of sexual arousal in women. Psychophysiology, 13, 196–204. CrossRef
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.
- Kukkonen, T. M., Paterson, L., Binik, Y. M., Amsel, R., Bouvier, F., & Khalifé, S. (2006). Convergent and discriminant validity of clitoral color Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of female sexual arousal. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32, 281–287. CrossRef
- Laan, E., Everaerd, W., & Evers, A. (1995). Assessment of female sexual arousal: Response specificity and construct validity. Psychophysiology, 32, 476–485. CrossRef
- Laan, E., Sonderman, M., & Janssen, E. (1995, September). Straight and lesbian women’s sexual responses to straight and lesbian erotica: No sexual orientation effects. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Provincetown, MA.
- Levin, R. J. (1998). Assessing human female sexual arousal by vaginal photoplethysmography: A critical examination. Sexologies: European Journal of Medical Sexology, 6, 25–31.
- Meston, C. M., & Frolich, P. F. (2003). Love at first fright: Partner salience moderates roller-coaster-induced excitation transfer. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 537–544. CrossRef
- Meston, C. M., & Gorzalka, B. B. (1996). The effects of immediate, delayed, and residual sympathetic activation on sexual arousal in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 143–148. CrossRef
- Pennebaker, J. W., & Roberts, T. (1992). Toward a his and hers theory of emotion: Gender differences in visceral perception. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 199–212.
- Rellini, A. H., McCall, K. M., Randall, P. K., & Meston, C. M. (2005). The relationship between women’s subjective and physiological sexual arousal. Psychophysiology, 42, 116–124. CrossRef
- Rieger, G., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16, 579–584. CrossRef
- Rosen, R. C., & Beck, J. G. (1988). Patterns of sexual arousal: Psychophysiological processes and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press.
- Rullo, J., Kinnish, K., & Strassberg, D. (2006). Sex differences in the specificity of sexual behavior, fantasy, and romantic attraction. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wincze, J. P., Venditti, E., Barlow, D., & Mavissakalian, M. (1980). The effects of a subjective monitoring task in the physiological measure of genital response to erotic stimulation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 533–545. CrossRef
- Wolchik, S. A., Braver, S. L., & Jensen, K. (1985). Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 93–107. CrossRef
- Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 297–329. CrossRef
- Sex Differences in Patterns of Genital Sexual Arousal: Measurement Artifacts or True Phenomena?
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 38, Issue 4 , pp 559-573
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Vaginal photoplethysmography
- Sex differences
- Industry Sectors