Negotiating a Friends with Benefits Relationship
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Friends with benefits (FWB) refers to “friends” who have sex. Study 1 (N = 125) investigated the prevalence of these relationships and why individuals engaged in this relationship. Results indicated that 60% of the individuals surveyed have had this type of relationship, that a common concern was that sex might complicate friendships by bringing forth unreciprocated desires for romantic commitment, and ironically that these relationships were desirable because they incorporated trust and comfort while avoiding romantic commitment. Study 2 (N = 90) assessed the relational negotiation strategies used by participants in these relationships. The results indicated that people in FWB relationships most often avoided explicit relational negotiation. Thus, although common, FWB relationships are often problematic for the same reasons that they are attractive.
- Acher, M., & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangle theory of love. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 9, 21–50. CrossRef
- Afifi, W. A., & Faulkner, S. L. (2000). On being ‘just friends’: The frequency and impact of sexual activity in cross-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal relationships, 17, 205–222. CrossRef
- Armstrong, R. L. (1985). Friendship. Journal of Value Inquiry, 19, 211–216. CrossRef
- Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535–551. CrossRef
- Baxter, L. A., & Wilmot, W. (1985). Taboo topics in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 253–269. CrossRef
- Brehm, S., Miller, R., Perlman, D., & Campbell, S. (2002). Intimate relationships (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Christen, C. T. (2001). Predicting willingness to negotiate: The effects of perceived power and trustworthiness in a model of strategic communication. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 62(4-A), 1270.
- Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 49–66. CrossRef
- Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (2002). Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships. Human Communication Research, 28, 243–257.
- Mongeau, P. A., Ramirez, A., & Vorell, M. (2003). Friends with benefits: Initial explorations of sexual, non-romantic, relationships. Unpublished manuscript, Arizona State University at Tempe.
- Parks, M. R. (1982). Ideology in interpersonal communication: Off the couch and into the world. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 79–107). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
- Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The causalities of ‘casual sex’: A qualitative exploration of phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661. CrossRef
- Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlations of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. CrossRef
- Pogrebin, L. C. (1987). Among friends. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Reeder, H. M. (2000). ‘I like you as a friend’: The role of attraction in cross-sex friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 329–348. CrossRef
- Sapadin, L. (1988). Friendships and gender: Perspectives of professional men and women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 387–403. CrossRef
- Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481. CrossRef
- Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135. CrossRef
- Sternberg, R. J. (1987). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, commitment. New York: Basic Books.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triangle of love. New York: Basic Books.
- Ward, C. A., & Kahn, J. H. (2003). Why do men distance? Factors predictive of male avoidance of intimate conflict. Family Therapy, 30, 1–11.
- Werking, K. J. (1997). We’re just good friends: Women and men in nonromantic relationships. New York: Guilford.
- Whitley, B. E. (1993). Reliability and aspects of the construct validity of Sternberg’s triangular love scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 475–480. CrossRef
- Negotiating a Friends with Benefits Relationship
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 38, Issue 1 , pp 66-73
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Friends with benefits
- Romantic relationships
- Industry Sectors