Behavioral Characteristics of Men Accused of Rape: Evidence for Different Types of Rapists
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The aim of this study was to determine whether the behavioral characteristics demonstrated by rapists clustered together into groups that were similar to the common rapist typology in the literature: anger, power exploitative, power reassurance, and sadistic. Two studies were conducted to examine the evidence for this typology. Study 1 involved the analysis of data from 130 men charged with sexual assault and Study 2 involved the analysis of court transcripts from 50 rape cases tried through the court system. The results of Study 1 revealed that there was some validity to the characteristics usually associated with each of the four types of rape, especially for the power reassurance and sadistic rapists. However, there were some unexpected outliers within both the anger and power exploitative types of rapists, which may suggest that there is more than one type of anger rapist and more than two types of power rapists. The results of Study 2 very closely replicated the results of Study 1. Future research needs to focus on the behavioral, motivational, and cognitive characteristics associated with each of the types of rapists and research them separately, so that it is possible to further evaluate the evidence for the typology identified in this study.
- Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Serin, R., Amos, N., & Preston, D. (1994). Comparisons between sexual and nonsexual rapist subtypes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 95–114.
- Canter, D., & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offence behavior: Developments in offender profiling. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1, 185–212.
- Cohen, M., Seghorn, T., & Calmas, W. (1969). Sociometric study of sex offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 249–255.
- Crimes Act. (1956). Act No. 6231 of 1956. Melbourne, Victoria: Government Printer of Victoria.
- Crimes Act. (1991). Act No. 81/1991, New Subdivision 8A to 8G under section 35. Melbourne, Victoria: Government Printer of Victoria.
- Darke, J. (1990). Sexual aggression: Achieving power through humiliation. In W. Marshall, D. Laws, & H. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 55–72). New York: Plenum.
- Douglas, J., & Olshaker, M. (1998). Obsession. Sydney: Pocket Books.
- Gebhard, P., Gagnon, J., Pomeroy, W., & Christenson, C. (1965). Sex offenders: Analysis of types. New York: Harper & Row.
- Groth, A. N. (1979). Men who rape: The psychology of the offender. New York: Plenum Press.
- Groth, A. N., Burgess, A. W., & Holmstrom, L. L. (1977). Rape: Power, anger, and sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239–1243.
- Guttmacher, M., & Weihofen, H. (1952). Psychiatry and the law. New York: Norton.
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. C., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Hazelwood, R., & Burgess, A. (1987). Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach. New York: Elsevier.
- Holmstrom, L. L., & Burgess, A. W. (1980). Sexual behavior of assailants during reported rapes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 427–439.
- Knight, R., & Prentky, R. (1990).Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In W. Marshall, D. Laws, & H. Barbaree (Eds.), The handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 23–52). New York: Plenum.
- Knight, R. A., Prentky, R. A., Schneider, B., & Rosenberg, R. (1983). Classification of sexual offenders: Perspectives, methods and validation. In A. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault: A research handbook (pp. 222–293). New York: Garland.
- Kopp, S. (1962). The character structure of sex offenders. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 16, 64–70.
- Polaschek, D., Ward, T., & Hudson, S. (1997). Rape and rapists: Theory and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 117–144.
- Prentky, R. A., & Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 643–661.
- Rada, R. (1978). Clinical aspects of the rapist. New York: Grune & Stratton.
- Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1985). “Riding the bull at Gilley’s”: Convicted rapists describe the rewards of rape. Social Problems, 32, 251–263.
- Seghorn, T., & Cohen, M. (1980). The psychology of the rape assailant. In W. Curran, A. McGarry, & C. Petty (Eds.), Modern legal medicine, psychiatry, and forensic science (pp. 320–344). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
- Yourell, A., & McCabe, M. P. (1988). The motivations underlying male rape of women. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and the Family, 9, 215–224.
- Behavioral Characteristics of Men Accused of Rape: Evidence for Different Types of Rapists
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 34, Issue 2 , pp 241-253
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- sexual assault
- Industry Sectors