Artificial Intelligence and Law

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 217–246

Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10506-010-9102-z

Cite this article as:
Walton, D. Artif Intell Law (2010) 18: 217. doi:10.1007/s10506-010-9102-z

Abstract

In this paper, it is shown (1) that there are two schemes for argument from analogy that seem to be competitors but are not, (2) how one of them is based on a distinctive type of similarity premise, (3) how to analyze the notion of similarity using story schemes illustrated by some cases, (4) how arguments from precedent are based on arguments from analogy, and in many instances arguments from classification, and (5) that when similarity is defined by means of episode schemes, we can get a clearer idea of how it integrates with the use of argument from classification and argument from precedent in case-based reasoning by using a dialogue structure.

Keywords

StoriesCase-based reasoningArgument from classificationArgumentation

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric (CRRAR)University of WindsorWindsorCanada