Artificial Intelligence and Law

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 181–225

Comparing Alternatives in the law*

Legal Applications of Qualitative Comparative Reasoning

Authors

    • Department of MetajuridicaUniversity of Maastricht
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10506-005-6926-z

Cite this article as:
Hage, J. Artif Intell Law (2004) 12: 181. doi:10.1007/s10506-005-6926-z

Abstract

This paper argues the thesis that a particular style of reasoning, qualitative comparative reasoning (QCR), plays a role in at least three areas of legal reasoning that are central in AI and law research, namely legal theory construction, case-based reasoning in the form of case comparison, and legal proof. The paper gives an informal exposition of one particular way to deal with QCR, based on the author’s previous work on reason-based logic (RBL). Then it contains a substantially adapted formalisation of RBL, to make RBL suitable for dealing with QCR. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of related work.

Keywords

case-based reasoninglegal proofqualitative comparative reasoningreason-based logictheory construction

Copyright information

© Springer 2005