Validity and Effectiveness of Ambiguity: A Famous Argument by Socrates
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
An argument can be superficially valid and rhetorically effective even if what is plausibly meant, what is derived from what, and how it is derived is not at all clear. An example of such an argument is provided by Socrates’s famous refutation of Euthyphro’s second definition of holy, which is generally regarded as clearly valid and successful. This paper provides a stricter logical analysis than the ones in the literature. In particular, it is shown that the argument contains a syntactically ambiguous expression, a passage that needs to be read charitably, and a previously unnoticed but crucial shift between two notions of unholy. Different analyses may be provided, depending on how these interpretation problems are solved. The conditions under which the refutation is valid and successful are far from obvious, and are here explicitly specified.
- Benson, H.H. 2000. Socratic wisdom: The model of knowledge in Plato’s early dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dancy, R.M. 2004. Plato’s introduction of forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gallop, D. 1997. Defence of Socrates; Euthyphro; Crito. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Guarino, N. 2009. The ontological level: Revisiting 30 years of knowledge representation. In Conceptual modelling: Foundations and applications. Essays in Honor of John Mylopoulos, ed. A. Borgida, V. Chaudhri, P. Giorgini, and E. Yu, 52–67. Berlin: Springer. CrossRef
- Gupta, A. 2009. Definitions. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition). URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/definitions/>.
- Iacona, A. 2010. L’argomentazione. Torino: Einaudi.
- Robinson, R. 1953. Plato’s earlier dialectic, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Robinson, R. 1954. Definition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Vlastos, G. 1993. The Socratic elenchus: Method is all. In Socratic studies, ed. M. Burnyeat, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Walton, D.N. 2007. Dialog theory for critical argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Validity and Effectiveness of Ambiguity: A Famous Argument by Socrates
Volume 26, Issue 3 , pp 393-407
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors