Alexy, R. 1989. A theory of legal argumentation: The theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification. Oxford: Clarendon (1st ed. in German 1978.).
Atkinson, K., T. Bench-Capon, and P. McBurney. 2004. Justifying practical reasoning. In Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on computational models of natural argument (CMNA 2004), ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain, 87–90.
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., and H. Prakken. 2010. Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artificial Intelligence and Law
18(2): 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dung, P.M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmono- tonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence
77: 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, A.M., and Freeman, K. 1995. Burden of proof in legal argumentation. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL), 156–164. New York: ACM.
Freeman, K., and A.M. Farley. 1996. A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law
4(3–4): 163–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, T.F. 1995. The pleadings game: An artificial intelligence model of procedural justice
. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Gordon, T.F., H. Prakken, and D. Walton. 2007. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence
171(10–11): 875–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, T.F., and D. Walton. 2009a. Proof burdens and standards. In Argumentation in artificial intelligence
, ed. I. Rahwan and G. Simari, 239–260. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, T., and D. Walton. 2009b. Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In International conference on artificial intelligence and law, ed. C. Hafner, 137–146. New York: ACM.
Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies
. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
McBurney, P., D. Hitchcock, and S. Parsons. 2007. The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue. International Journal of Intelligent Systems
22: 95–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBurney, P., and S. Parsons. 2001. Chance discovery using dialectical argumentation. In New frontiers in artificial intelligence: Joint JSAI 2001 workshop post proceedings, eds. T. Terano, T. Nishida, A. Namatame, S. Tsumoto, Y. Ohsawa and T. Washio, 414--424. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2253. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
MacCormick, D.N., and R.S. Summers (eds.). 1991. Interpreting statutes: A comparative study
. Darthmouth: Aldershot.Google Scholar
MacCormick, D.N., and R.S. Summers (eds.). 1997. Interpreting precedents: A comparative study
. Darthmouth: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Mochales, R., and M.-F.Moens. 2009. Argumentation mining: The detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, 98–107. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.
Mochales, R., and M.-F. Moens. 2011. Argumentation mining. Artificial Intelligence and Law
19(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1993. The nature of rationality
. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. 1999. Law and truth
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. 1995. Cognitive carpentry
. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.L., and J. Cruz. 1999. Contemporary theories of knowledge. Totowa, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
Prakken, H. 2010. On the nature of argument schemes. In Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: An examination of Douglas Walton’s theory of reasoning and argument
, ed. Chris Reed and Christopher W. Tindale, 167–185. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Prakken, H., and Sartor, G. 2009. A logical analysis of burdens of proof. In Legal evidence and proof: Statistics, stories, logic, ed. H. Kaptein, H. Prakken, B. Verheij, 223–53. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Rawls, J. 1993. Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Sartor, G. 2005. Legal reasoning: A cognitive approach to the law. Vol 5 of treatise on legal philosophy and general jurisprudence. Berlin: Springer.
Sartor, G. 2007. A teleological approach to legal dialogues. In Law, rights and discourse. Themes from the legal philosophy of Robert Alexy, 249–274. Oxford: Hart.
Sunstein, C.R., and A. Vermeule. 2003. Interpretation and institutions. Michigan Law Review
101: 885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse
. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Verheij, B. 2008. About the logical relations between cases and rules. In Legal knowledge and information systems
, ed. E. Francesconi, G. Sartor, and D. Tiscornia, 21–32. Amsterdam: IOS.Google Scholar
Walton, D. 1990. Practical reasoning: Goal-driven, knowledge-based, action-guiding argumentation, savage
. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Walton, D. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Walton, D. 2011. Argument mining by applying argumentation schemes. Studies in Logic
4(1): 38–64.Google Scholar
Walton, D., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue
. Albany, New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Walton, D., C. Reed and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D., K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon, A. Wyner, and D. Cartwright. 2004. Argumentation in the framework of deliberation dialogue. In Arguing global governance
, ed. Corneliu Bjola and Markus Kornprobst, 210–230. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, M. 2000. Reasoning about rational agents. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.