Alexy, R. 1989. A theory of legal argumentation: The theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification. Oxford: Clarendon (1st ed. in German 1978.).
Atkinson, K., T. Bench-Capon, and P. McBurney. 2004. Justifying practical reasoning. In Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on computational models of natural argument (CMNA 2004), ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain, 87–90.
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., and H. Prakken. 2010. Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artificial Intelligence and Law
Dung, P.M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmono- tonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence
Farley, A.M., and Freeman, K. 1995. Burden of proof in legal argumentation. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL), 156–164. New York: ACM.
Freeman, K., and A.M. Farley. 1996. A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law
Gordon, T.F. 1995. The pleadings game: An artificial intelligence model of procedural justice. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer.
Gordon, T.F., H. Prakken, and D. Walton. 2007. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence
Gordon, T.F., and D. Walton. 2009a. Proof burdens and standards. In Argumentation in artificial intelligence
, ed. I. Rahwan and G. Simari, 239–260. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Gordon, T., and D. Walton. 2009b. Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In International conference on artificial intelligence and law, ed. C. Hafner, 137–146. New York: ACM.
Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.
McBurney, P., D. Hitchcock, and S. Parsons. 2007. The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue. International Journal of Intelligent Systems
McBurney, P., and S. Parsons. 2001. Chance discovery using dialectical argumentation. In New frontiers in artificial intelligence: Joint JSAI 2001 workshop post proceedings, eds. T. Terano, T. Nishida, A. Namatame, S. Tsumoto, Y. Ohsawa and T. Washio, 414--424. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2253. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
MacCormick, D.N., and R.S. Summers (eds.). 1991. Interpreting statutes: A comparative study. Darthmouth: Aldershot.
MacCormick, D.N., and R.S. Summers (eds.). 1997. Interpreting precedents: A comparative study. Darthmouth: Aldershot.
Mochales, R., and M.-F.Moens. 2009. Argumentation mining: The detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, 98–107. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.
Mochales, R., and M.-F. Moens. 2011. Argumentation mining. Artificial Intelligence and Law
Nozick, R. 1993. The nature of rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Patterson, D. 1999. Law and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollock, J. 1995. Cognitive carpentry. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pollock, J.L., and J. Cruz. 1999. Contemporary theories of knowledge. Totowa, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
Prakken, H. 2010. On the nature of argument schemes. In Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: An examination of Douglas Walton’s theory of reasoning and argument, ed. Chris Reed and Christopher W. Tindale, 167–185. London: College Publications.
Prakken, H., and Sartor, G. 2009. A logical analysis of burdens of proof. In Legal evidence and proof: Statistics, stories, logic, ed. H. Kaptein, H. Prakken, B. Verheij, 223–53. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Rawls, J. 1993. Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Sartor, G. 2005. Legal reasoning: A cognitive approach to the law. Vol 5 of treatise on legal philosophy and general jurisprudence. Berlin: Springer.
Sartor, G. 2007. A teleological approach to legal dialogues. In Law, rights and discourse. Themes from the legal philosophy of Robert Alexy, 249–274. Oxford: Hart.
Sunstein, C.R., and A. Vermeule. 2003. Interpretation and institutions. Michigan Law Review
Van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Verheij, B. 2008. About the logical relations between cases and rules. In Legal knowledge and information systems, ed. E. Francesconi, G. Sartor, and D. Tiscornia, 21–32. Amsterdam: IOS.
Walton, D. 1990. Practical reasoning: Goal-driven, knowledge-based, action-guiding argumentation, savage. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
Walton, D. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Walton, D. 2011. Argument mining by applying argumentation schemes. Studies in Logic 4(1): 38–64.
Walton, D., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue. Albany, New York: SUNY Press.
Walton, D., C. Reed and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D., K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon, A. Wyner, and D. Cartwright. 2004. Argumentation in the framework of deliberation dialogue. In Arguing global governance, ed. Corneliu Bjola and Markus Kornprobst, 210–230. London: Routledge.
Wooldridge, M. 2000. Reasoning about rational agents. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.