Argumentation

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 325–353

Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10503-011-9257-0

Cite this article as:
Bex, F. & Verheij, B. Argumentation (2012) 26: 325. doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9257-0

Abstract

In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reasoning may be analysed in a dialectical way by means of critical questions that point to typical sources of doubt. We discuss critical questions about the evidential arguments adduced, about the narrative accounts of the facts considered, and about the way in which the arguments and narratives are connected in an analysis. Our treatment shows how two different types of knowledge, represented as schemes, play a role in reasoning with evidence: argumentation schemes and story schemes.

Keywords

Argumentation schemesCase-studyEvidenceLegal reasoningNarrative

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Argumentation Research Group, School of ComputingUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK
  2. 2.Department of Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands