Cain, D., G. Loewenstein, and D.A. Moore. 2005. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies
CERACT 2008. Committee on education, research and appraisal of the consequences of technology, March 3rd, 2008. Verbatim Protocol 16/53, German Bundestag. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21.web/searchDocuments/simple_search.do
. Accessed 10 June 2011.
Gigerenzer, G. 2008. Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., and H. Brighton. 2009. Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science
Godden, D.M., and D. Walton. 2006. Argument from expert opinion as legal evidence: Critical questions and admissibility criteria of expert testimony in the American legal system. Ratio Juris
Goldman, A.I. 1999. Knowledge in a social world
. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.CrossRef
Goodwin, J. 2010. Trust in Experts as a Principal-Agent Problem. In Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: An examination of Douglas Walton’s theories of reasoning and argument, ed. C. Tindale and C. Reed, 133–143. London: College Publications.
Goodwin, J., and L. Honeycutt. 2010. When science goes public: From technical arguments to appeals to authority. Studies in Communication Sciences 9(2): 19–30.
Habermas, J. 2005. Knowledge and human interests: A general perspective. In Continental philosophy of science
, ed. G. Gutting, 310–349. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRef
Hahn, U., and M. Oaskford. 2006. A Bayesian approach to informal reasoning fallacies. Synthese
Hahn, U., A.J.L. Harris, and A. Corner. 2009. Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal Logic 29(4): 337–367.
Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London, UK: Methuen.
Hornikx, J. 2008. Comparing the actual and expected persuasiveness of evidence types: How good are lay people at selecting persuasive evidence? Argumentation
Koch, C., and C. Schmidt. 2010. Disclosing conflicts of interest—Do experience and reputation matter? Accounting, Organizations and Society
Li, M., and K. Madarás. 2008. When mandatory disclosure hurts: Expert advice and conflicting interests. Journal of Economic Theory
Lo, B., and M.J. Field, eds. 2009. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and Practice. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Locke, J. 1975 (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mansbridge, J.J. 1990. Preface. In Beyond self-interest, ed. J.J. Mansbridge, ix–xiii. Chicago, ILL: Chicago University Press.
Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Miller, D.T. 2001. The norm of self-interest. In The next phase of business ethics: Integrating psychology and ethics, vol. 3
, ed. J. Dienhart, D. Moberg, and R. Duska, 193–210. Bingley: Emerald Group.CrossRef
Mosley, A. 2005. Egoism. In The internet encyclopedia of philosophy
, ed. J. Fieser and B. Dowden. http://www.iep.utm.edu/egoism/
. Accessed 10 June 2011.
Oaksford, M., and N. Charter. 2009. Précis of Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Patterson, M.R. 1999. Conflicts of interest in scientific expert testimony. William and Mary Law Review 40(4): 1303–1394.
Pollock, J.L. 1995. Cognitive carpentry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rand, A. 1964. Virtue of selfishness. New York: Signet.
Rehg, W. 2009. Cogent science in context. The science wars, argumentation theory and Habermas. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Schopler, J., and C.A. Insko. 1992. The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: Generality and mediation. In European review of social psychology, vol. 3, ed. W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone, 121–151. Chichester: Wiley.
Sen, A.K. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs 6: 317–344.
Simon, H.A. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review
Simon, H.A. 1985. The dialogue of psychology with political science. The American Political Science Review
Šorm, E. 2010. The good, the bad and the persuasive: Normative quality and actual persuasiveness of arguments from authority, arguments from cause to effect and arguments from example. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series., vol. 241.
Tocqueville, A. de. 1889. Democracy in America. London: Longman, Greens & Co.
van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans. 1999. Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrance Erlbaum.
Walton, D.N. 1997. Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Walton, D.N. 2002. Legal argumentation and evidence. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Walton, D.N. 2011. Arguments, types of. In: Internet encyclopedia. http://science.jrank.org/pages/20958/arguments-types.html
. Accessed 10 June 2011.
Walton, D., and C. Reed. 2003. Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions. In Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, ch. 16, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, C.A. Willard, and A.F. Snoek Henkemans. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Woods, J., and D. Walton. 1974. Argumentum ad verecundiam. Philosophy and Rhetoric 7: 135–153.
Zenker, F. 2010. Analyzing social policy argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law. Informal Logic 30(1): 62–91.
Zenker, F. 2011. Deduction, induction, conduction: An attempt at unifying natural language argument structure. In Contributions to a Symposium on Conductive Argument, April 2010, University of Windsor, ON, ed. J.A. Blair and R. Johnson. London, UK: College Press (forthcoming).