, 25:371

Expertise as Argument: Authority, Democracy, and Problem-Solving


DOI: 10.1007/s10503-011-9221-z

Cite this article as:
Majdik, Z.P. & Keith, W.M. Argumentation (2011) 25: 371. doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9221-z


This article addresses the problem of expertise in a democratic political system: the tension between the authority of expertise and the democratic values that guide political life. We argue that for certain problems, expertise needs to be understood as a dialogical process, and we conceptualize an understanding of expertise through and as argument that positions expertise as constituted by and a function of democratic values and practices, rather than in the possession of, acquisition of, or relationship to epistemic materials. Conceptualizing expertise through argument leads us to see expertise as a kind of phronetic practice, oriented toward judgments and problems, characterized by its ability to provide inventional capacities for selecting the best possible resolution of a particular problem vis-à-vis particular expectations regarding the resolution of a problem. At its core, expertise thus comes to exist in reference not to epistemic but to dialogical, deliberative, democratic practice.



Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA