Rationality, Reasonableness, and Critical Rationalism: Problems with the Pragma-dialectical View
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A major virtue of the Pragma-Dialectical theory of argumentation is its commitment to reasonableness and rationality as central criteria of argumentative quality. However, the account of these key notions offered by the originators of this theory, Frans van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, seems to us problematic in several respects. In what follows we criticize that account and suggest an alternative, offered elsewhere, that seems to us to be both independently preferable and more in keeping with the epistemic approach to arguments and argumentation we favor.
- Biro, J., and H. Siegel. 1992. Normativity, argumentation and an epistemic theory of fallacies. In Argumentation illuminated Ch. 7, eds. F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair, and C.A. Willard, 85–103. Amsterdam: SICSAT.
- Biro, J., and H. Siegel. 2006. Pragma-dialectic versus epistemic theories of arguing and arguments: Rivals or partners? In Considering pragma-dialectics, eds. P. Houtlosser, and A. van Rees, 1–10. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Biro, J., and H. Siegel. 2006a. In defense of the objective epistemic approach to argumentation. Informal Logic, 26:91–101.
- van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lakatos, I. 1974. Popper on demarcation and induction. In Schilpp (1974), 241–273.
- Levison, A. 1974. Popper, hume, and the traditional problem of induction. In Schilpp (1974), 322–331.
- Miller, D. 1985. Editor’s introduction. In Popper selections. ed. D. Miller, 9–22. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Miller, D. 1994. Critical rationalism: A restatement and defense. Chicago: Open Court.
- Newton-Smith, W.H. 1981. The rationality of science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Oddie, G. 1996. Rescuing reason. Philosophy 71:445–460. CrossRef
- O’Hear, A. 1980. Karl Popper. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Popper, K.R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
- Popper, K.R. 1963. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
- Popper, K.R. 1972. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Popper, K.R. 1974. Replies to my critics. In Schilpp (1974), 961–1197.
- Putnam, H. 1974. The “Corroboration” of theories. In Schilpp (1974), 221–240.
- Salmon, W.C. 1966. The foundations of scientific inference. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Schilpp, P.A. ed. 1974. The philosophy of Karl Popper. (The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. XIV.) La Salle: Open Court.
- Siegel, H. 1997. Rationality redeemed?: Further dialogues on an educational ideal. New York: Routledge.
- Siegel, H., and J. Biro 1997. Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies. Argumentation 11:277–292. CrossRef
- Williams, M. 1999. Skepticism. In The Blackwell guide to epistemology. eds. J. Greco, and E. Sosa, 35–69. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Williams, M. 2005. Doing without immediate justification. In Contemporary debates in epistemology. eds. M. Steup, and E. Sosa, 202–216. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Rationality, Reasonableness, and Critical Rationalism: Problems with the Pragma-dialectical View
Volume 22, Issue 2 , pp 191-203
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Critical rationalism
- Münchhausen Trilemma
- Industry Sectors