Learning by Arguing About Evidence and Explanations
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Collaborative learning with cases characteristically involves discussing and developing shared explanations. We investigated the argumentation scheme which learners use in constructing shared explanations over evidence. We observed medical students attempting to explain how a judge had arrived at his verdict in a case of medical negligence. The students were learning within a virtual learning environment and their communication was computer mediated. We identify the dialogue type that these learners construct and show that their argumentation conforms with an abductive form of argumentation scheme (‘inference to the best explanation’). We also assessed the students’ learning and propose that it is related to particular features of this argumentation scheme.
- Baker, M. 2003. Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In Arguing to learn, eds. J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
- Dowell, J., and T. Gladisch. 2007. Design of argument diagramming tools for case-based group learning. In Proceedings of the 14th European conference on cognitive ergonomics, ed. W. Wong. ACM Press.
- Goldberg, R. 2000. The contraceptive pill, negligence and causation: Views on Vadera v. Shaw. The Medical Law Review 8: 316–338. CrossRef
- Honderich, T., ed. 1995. The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford University Press.
- Jermann, P., and P. Dillenbourg. 2003. Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In Arguing to learn, eds. J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
- Josephson, J.R., and S.G. Josephson. 1996. Abductive inference, computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge University Press.
- Koschmann, T. 2003. CSCL, argumentation and deweyan inquiry. In Arguing to learn, eds. J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
- Magnani, L. 1992. Abductive reasoning: Philosophical and educational perspective on medicine. In Advanced models of cognition in medical training and practice, eds. D.A. Evan, and V.L. Patel. Berlin: Springer.
- Peirce, C.S. 1997. Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking. In The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism, ed. Patricia Ann Turrisi. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Piaget, J. 1955. The child’s construction of reality. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Popper, K.R. 1979. Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Roschelle, J. 1992. Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(3): 235–276. CrossRef
- Shirouzu, H., and N. Miyake. 2002. Learning by collaborating revisited: Individualistic vs convergent understanding. In Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the cognitive science society, USA, 1039.
- Simon, H.A. 1965. The logic of rational decision. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16: 169–186. CrossRef
- Simon, H.A. 1977. Models of discovery and other topics in the methods of science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Smith, W., J. Dowell, and M. Ortega-Lafuente. 1999. An authoring environment for developing training exercises in integrated emergency management. Cognition, Technology and Work 1(2): 119–131. CrossRef
- Suthers, D.D., and C.D. Hundhausen. 2003. An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(2): 183–219. CrossRef
- Walton, D. 1989. Informal logic: A handbook for critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
- Walton, D. 2005. Abductive reasoning. Alabama University Press.
- Learning by Arguing About Evidence and Explanations
Volume 22, Issue 2 , pp 217-233
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Collaborative learning
- Abductive reasoning
- Argumentation scheme
- Industry Sectors