Argumentation

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 1–27

Argument by Analogy

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9

Cite this article as:
Juthe, A. Argumentation (2005) 19: 1. doi:10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9

Abstract

In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered.

Keywords

analogueanalogyargument by analogyassigned-predicateconclusive analogycounterpartdifferent-domain-analogyinconclusive analogyone-to-one correspondencesame-domain-analogytarget-subject

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilsophyUniversity of UppsalaAlundaSweden