Argument by Analogy
Cite this article as: Juthe, A. Argumentation (2005) 19: 1. doi:10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 Abstract
In this essay I characterize arguments by analogy, which have an important role both in philosophical and everyday reasoning. Arguments by analogy are different from ordinary inductive or deductive arguments and have their own distinct features. I try to characterize the structure and function of these arguments. It is further discussed that some arguments, which are not explicit arguments by analogy, nevertheless should be interpreted as such and not as inductive or deductive arguments. The result is that a presumed outcome of a philosophical dispute will have to be reconsidered.
Keywords analogue analogy argument by analogy assigned-predicate conclusive analogy counterpart different-domain-analogy inconclusive analogy one-to-one correspondence same-domain-analogy target-subject References Allen, C. 1997 ‘The Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Uncaused Beginning of the Universe’ Dialogue XXXVI 555 562 Google Scholar Barker, E. M. 1989a ‘Beardsley’s Theory of Analogy’ Informal Logic XI 185 194 Google Scholar Barker, S. F. 1989b ‘Analogy in Hume’s DIALOGUES’ Informal Logic XI 173 184 Google Scholar Beardsley, M. 1975Thinking Straight4th Prentice Hall Englewood Google Scholar Blair, J. A., Johnson, R., H., 1987 ‘Argumentation as Dialectical’ Argumentation 1 41 456 CrossRef Google Scholar Brown, W. R. 1989 ‘Two Traditions of Analogy’ Informal Logic XI 160 172 Google Scholar Brown, W. R. 1995 ‘The Domain Constraint on Analogy and Analogical Argument’ Informal Logic 17 89 100 Google Scholar Burbidge, J. 1990Within Reason – A Guide to Non-deductive Reasoning Broadview Press Peterborough Google Scholar Copi, I. M. 1990Introduction to Logic8th Macmillian Publishing Company New York Google Scholar Copi, I., Burgess-Jackson, K. 1992Informal Logic8th Macmillian Publishing Company New York Google Scholar Davies, T. R. 1988 ‘Determination, Uniformity, and Relevance: Normative Criteria for Generalization and Reasoning by Analogy’ Helman, D.H. eds. Analogical Reasoning: Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy Kluwer Dordrecht 227 259 Google Scholar Geisler, N. 1991Thomas Aquinas: An Evangelical Appraisal, Grand Rapids Baker Book House MI Google Scholar Govier, T. 1985 ‘Logical Analogies’ Informal Logic VII 26 33 Google Scholar Govier, T. 1989 ‘Analogies and Missing Premises’ Informal Logic 11 141 152 Google Scholar
Hobbes, T.: 1946,
Leviathan: Or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil, In: M. Oakeshott (ed.), Oxford, Basil Blackwell . Holyoak, K. J., Thagard, P. 1995Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought The MIT Press Cambridge Google Scholar
Juthe A.: 2005, ‘Refutation by Parallel Arguments’, (forthcoming).
Norman, M. 1958 ‘Knowledge of Other Minds’ The Journal of Philosophy 55 969 978 Google Scholar
Prager D.: 2003, ‘George Will and Capital Punishment’,
Townhall nov 4, 2003, http://www.townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/dp20031104.sthml. (Viewed” 041006, 19.00). Smith, Q. 1994 ‘Can Everything Come to Be Without a Cause?’ Dialogue XXXIII 313 323 Google Scholar Steinhart, E. C. 2001The Logic of Metaphor – Analogous Parts of Possible Worlds Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht Google Scholar Sullivan, T. D. 1994 ‘On the Alleged Causeless Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Quentin Smith’ Dialogue XXXIII 325 335 Google Scholar
Thomasson, D.: 2003, ‘Debating the Death Penalty’,
Townhall nov 15, 2003, http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GuestColumns/20031115.sthml. (Viewed” 041006, 19.00)
Walton, D.: 1996,
Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Lawrence Erlbaum Weitzenfeld, J. S. 1984 ‘Valid Reasoning by Analogy’ Philosophy of Science 51 137 149 CrossRef Google Scholar Woods, J., Hudak, B. 1992 ‘Verdi is the Puccini of Music’ Synthese 92 189 220 CrossRef Google Scholar