Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparative Study of Turbulence in Ramp-Up and Ramp-Down Unsteady Flows

  • Published:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DNS of a turbulent channel flow subjected to a step change in pressure gradient are performed to facilitate a direct comparison between ramp-up and ramp-down flows. Strong differences are found between behaviours of turbulence in the two flows. The wall shear stress in the ramp-up flow first overshoots, and then strongly undershoots the quasi-steady value in the initial stage of the excursion, before approaching the quasi-steady value. In a strongly decelerating flow, the wall shear stress tends to first undershoot but then overshoot the quasi-steady value. ‘Slow’ response of turbulence as well as flow inertia is responsible for these behaviours. In the ramp-up flow, the response of turbulence is similar to that observed in uniformly accelerating flows from previous studies, exhibiting a three-stage development. However, the transition between the various stages is more gradual and the responding stage is much longer and slower in the flows considered here. It has been shown that the delay in the near wall region is longer than that in the buffer layer confirming that turbulence response first occurs at the location of peak turbulence production. In a strongly decelerating flow, the response of turbulence exhibits a two-stage development. In both ramp-up and ramp down flows, the energy distribution in the three components of turbulent kinetic energy deviates from that of the steady flow. In a ramp-up flow, more energy is in \(u_1^\prime \) and less in \(u_2^\prime \) and \(u_3^\prime \), whereas the trend is reversed in a ramp-down flow. This is a reflection of the redistribution of turbulence from \(u_1^\prime \) to \(u_2^\prime \) and \(u_3^\prime \).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brereton, G.J., Mankbadi, R.R.: Review of recent advances in the study of unsteady turbulent internal flows. Appl. Mech. Rev. 48(4), 189–212 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerrard, J.H.: An experimental investigation of pulsating turbulent water flow in a tube. J. Fluid Mech. 46(01), 43–64 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tu, S.W., Ramaprian, B.R.: Fully developed periodic turbulent pipe flow. Part 1. Main experimental results and comparison with predictions. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 31–58 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shemer, L., Wygnanski, I., Kit, E.: Pulsating flow in a pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 153, 313–337 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brereton, G.J., Reynolds, W.C., Jayaraman, R.: Response of a turbulent boundary layer to sinusoidal free-stream unsteadiness. J. Fluid Mech. 221(–1), 131–159 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scotti, A., Piomelli, U.: Numerical simulation of pulsating turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13(5), 1367–1384 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tardu, S.F., Da Costa, P.: Experiments and modeling of an unsteady turbulent channel flow. AIAA J. 43(1), 140–148 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tuzi, R., Blondeaux, P.: Intermittent turbulence in a pulsating pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 599, 51–79 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. He, S., Jackson, J.D.: An experimental study of pulsating turbulent flow in a pipe. Eur. J. Mech. B, Fluids 28(2), 309–320 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Maruyama, T., Kuribayashi, T., Mizushina, T.: Structure of the turbulence in transient pipe flows. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 9(6), 431–439 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenblatt, D., Moss, E.A.: Rapid temporal acceleration of a turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 514, 65–75 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. He, S., Jackson, J.D.: A study of turbulence under conditions of transient flow in a pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 408, 1–38 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. He, S., Ariyaratne, C., Vardy, A.E.: A computational study of wall friction and turbulence dynamics in accelerating pipe flows. Comput. Fluids 37(6), 674–689 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ariyaratne, C., He, S., Vardy, A.E.: Wall friction and turbulence dynamics in decelerating pipe flows. J. Hydraul. Res. 48, 810–821 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chung, Y.M.: Unsteady turbulent flow with sudden pressure gradient changes. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 47(8–9), 925–930 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, J., Moin, P.: Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 59(2), 308–323 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Orlandi, P.: Fluid Flow Phenomena: A Numerical Toolkit. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, J., Moin, P., Moser, R.: Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuisheng He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seddighi, M., He, S., Orlandi, P. et al. A Comparative Study of Turbulence in Ramp-Up and Ramp-Down Unsteady Flows. Flow Turbulence Combust 86, 439–454 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-011-9341-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-011-9341-4

Keywords

Navigation