Toward the Effective and Efficient Measurement of Implementation Fidelity

  • Sonja K. Schoenwald
  • Ann F. Garland
  • Jason E. Chapman
  • Stacy L. Frazier
  • Ashli J. Sheidow
  • Michael A. Southam-Gerow
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0321-0

Cite this article as:
Schoenwald, S.K., Garland, A.F., Chapman, J.E. et al. Adm Policy Ment Health (2011) 38: 32. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0321-0

Abstract

Implementation science in mental health is informed by other academic disciplines and industries. Conceptual and methodological territory charted in psychotherapy research is pertinent to two elements of the conceptual model of implementation posited by Aarons and colleagues (2010)—implementation fidelity and innovation feedback systems. Key characteristics of scientifically validated fidelity instruments, and of the feasibility of their use in routine care, are presented. The challenges of ensuring fidelity measurement methods are both effective (scientifically validated) and efficient (feasible and useful in routine care) are identified as are examples of implementation research attempting to balance these attributes of fidelity measurement.

Keywords

Implementation fidelity Fidelity measurement methods Adherence 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonja K. Schoenwald
    • 1
  • Ann F. Garland
    • 2
  • Jason E. Chapman
    • 1
  • Stacy L. Frazier
    • 3
  • Ashli J. Sheidow
    • 1
  • Michael A. Southam-Gerow
    • 4
  1. 1.Family Services Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Child and Adolescent Services Research CenterUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.University of IllinoisChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations