Date: 21 Oct 2010
Desistance from Intimate Partner Violence: the Role of Legal Cynicism, Collective Efficacy, and Social Disorganization in Chicago Neighborhoods
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper examined the relationship between reported Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) desistance and neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, ethnic heterogeneity, residential instability, collective efficacy and legal cynicism. Data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) Longitudinal survey were used to identify 599 cases of IPV in Wave 1 eligible for reported desistance in Wave 2. A Generalized Boosting Model was used to determine the best proximal predictors of IPV desistance from the longitudinal data. Controlling for these predictors, logistic regression of neighborhood characteristics from the PHDCN community survey was used to predict reported IPV desistance in Wave 2. The paper finds that participants living in neighborhoods high in legal cynicism have lower odds of reporting IPV desistance, controlling for other variables in the logistic regression model. Analyses did not find that IPV desistance was related to neighborhood concentrated disadvantage, ethnic heterogeneity, residential instability and collective efficacy.
Dedicated to the memory of Alex Velto, 1941–2009, great social worker, organizer and uncle.
Acierno, R., & Resnick, H. S. (1997). Health impact of interpersonal violence 1: Prevalence rates, case identification, and risk factors for sexual assault, physical assault, and domestic violence in men and women. Behavioral Medicine, 23(2), 1–16.CrossRef
Agnew, R. (1994). The techniques of neutralization and violence. Criminology, 32, 555–580.CrossRef
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513.CrossRef
Browning, C. (2002). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 833–850.CrossRef
Button, D. (2008). Social disadvantage and family violence: neighborhood effects on attitudes about intimate partner violence and corporal punishment. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 130–147.CrossRef
Cattaneo, L. (2010). The role of socioeconomic status in interactions with police among a national sample of women experiencing intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10464-1010-9297-x.
Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: A cross-disciplinary review. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 6(2), 141–175.CrossRef
Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Durkheim, E. (1893/1984). The division of labor in society. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Earls F. J. (2000). Project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods: Community survey, 1994–. hdl:1902.1/01951 UNF:3:Bt4Nv7NTmrWymGUj6Ri+tw==. Murray Research Archive (Distributor).
Earls, F. (2002). Project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods: Longitudinal cohort study, 1994–2001. hdl:1902.1/01953. Murray Research Archive (Distributor).
Fox, G., & Benson, M. (2006). Household and neighborhood contexts of intimate partner violence. Public Health Reports, 121(4), 419–427.PubMed
Gould, M. (1987). Revolution in the development of capitalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2001). The elements of statistical learning. New York, NY: Springer.
Hilton, N., & Harris, G. (2005). Predicting wife assault: A critical review and implications for policy and practice. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 6(1), 3–23.CrossRef
Hirschi, T. (2002). Causes of delinquency. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Bates, L., Smutzler, N., & Sandin, E. (1997). A brief review ofthe research on husband violence: Part I: Maritally violent versus non-violent men. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 65–98.CrossRef
Hotzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Bates, L. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence: Part III: Sociodemographic factors, relationship factors, and differing consequences of husband and wife violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 285–307.CrossRef
Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.CrossRef
Kornhauser, R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28(1), 1–69.
Levendosky, A., Huth-Bocks, A., & Semel, M. (2002). Adolescent peer relationships and mental health functioning in families with domestic violence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31(2), 206–218.PubMed
Madigan, D., & Ridgeway, G. (2004). Discussion of “least angle regression” by Effron et al. Annals of Statistics, 32, 465–469.
Matza, D. (1964/1990). Delinquency & drift. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
McGuigan, W., & Pratt, C. (2001). The predictive impact of domestic violence on three types of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 869–883.CrossRef
Meares, T., & Kahan, D. (1998). Law and (norms of) order in the inner city. Law & Society Review, 32, 805–838.CrossRef
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social structure and anomie. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (3rd ed.), (pp. 185–214). New York, NY: The Free Press.
Miles-Doan, R. (1998). Violence between spouses and intimates: Does neighborhood context matter? Social Forces, 77, 623–645.
Murray Research Center. (2005) Project on human development in chicago neighborhoods, Longitudinal cohort study, 1994-2001, Felton Earls. Retrieved January, 2006, from http://www.radcliffe.edu/murray/data, at Harvard College.
National Institute of Justice. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: A new look. Retrieved January, 2006, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/155282.htm.
Onyskiw, J., & Hayduk, L. (2001). Processes underlying children’s adjustment in families characterized by physical aggression. Family Relations, 50, 376–385.CrossRef
Patterson, G. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.
Ridgeway, G. (2007). Generalized boosting models: A guide to the gbm package. Retrieved July, 2008, from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gbm/vignettes/gbm.pdf.
Sampson, R., & Bartusch, D. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32, 777–804.CrossRef
Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1995). Crime in the making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sartin, R. M., Hansen, D. J., & Huss, M. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 425–440.CrossRef
Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Srole, L. (1956). Social integration and certain corollaries: An exploratory study. American Sociological Review, 21, 709–716.CrossRef
Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(1), 75–88.CrossRef
Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1990). Physical violence in American families, risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Tjaden, P. & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National violence against women survey (NCJ 183781).
Tomasulo, G. C., & McNamara, J. R. (2007). The relationship of abuse to women’s health status and health habits. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 231–235.CrossRef
Van Wyk, J., Benson, M., Fox, G., & DeMaris, A. (2003). Detangling individual-, partner-, and community-level correlates of partner violence. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 412–438.CrossRef
- Desistance from Intimate Partner Violence: the Role of Legal Cynicism, Collective Efficacy, and Social Disorganization in Chicago Neighborhoods
American Journal of Community Psychology
Volume 48, Issue 3-4 , pp 373-383
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Domestic violence
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Social Welfare, Yonsei University, 262 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea
- 2. George Warren Brown School of Social Work, One Brookings Drive, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- 3. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China