Adherence and Acceptability in MTN 001: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Daily Oral and Topical Tenofovir for HIV Prevention in Women Original Paper First Online: 14 October 2012 DOI:
Cite this article as: Minnis, A.M., Gandham, S., Richardson, B.A. et al. AIDS Behav (2013) 17: 737. doi:10.1007/s10461-012-0333-8 Abstract
We compared adherence to and acceptability of daily topical and oral formulations of tenofovir (TFV) used as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention among women in South Africa, Uganda and the United States. 144 sexually active, HIV-uninfected women participated in a cross-over study of three regimens: oral tablet, vaginal gel, or both. We tested for differences in adherence and evaluated product acceptability. Self-reported adherence for all regimens was high (94 %), but serum TFV concentrations indicated only 64 % of participants used tablets consistently. Most women in the U.S. (72 %) favored tablets over gel; while preferences varied at the African sites (42 % preferred gel and 40 % tablets). Findings indicate a role for oral and vaginal PrEP formulations and highlight the importance of integrating pharmacokinetics-based adherence assessment in future trials. Biomedical HIV prevention interventions should consider geographic and cultural experience with product formulations, partner involvement, and sexual health benefits that ultimately influence use.
Keywords Anti-infective agents HIV Patient compliance Sexual behavior Vaginal creams Foams and jellies Administration Oral PrEP Microbicide
This study is conducted for the MTN-001 Protocol Team.
van der Straten A, Van Damme L, Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR. Unraveling the divergent results of pre-exposure prophylaxis trials for HIV prevention. AIDS. 2012; 26(7):F13–9. Epub 2012/02/16.
Kashuba AD, Patterson KB, Dumond JB, Cohen MS. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: how to predict success. Lancet. 2012; 379(9835):2409–11. Epub 2011/12/14.
Cohen M, Baden L. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV–where do we go from here? N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):459–61.
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Grady D. FDA advisory panel backs preventive use of HIV drug. New York Times. May 10, 2012; D5.
Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science. 2010; 329(5996):1168–74. Epub 2010/07/21.
Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(27):2587–99. Epub 2010/11/26.
Baeten J, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(5):399–410. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC trial and another major study find PrEP can reduce risk of HIV infection among heterosexuals. July 13, 2011.
Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, Kapiga S, et al. The FEM-PrEP Trial of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (Truvada) among African Women. In: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; Seattle, WA, 2012.
MTN Statement on Decision to Discontinue Use of Tenofovir Gel in VOICE, a Major HIV Prevention Study in Women. November 25, 2011.
. Accessed 06 Jun 2012.
Donnnel D, Baeten J, Hendrix C, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate drug levels indicate PrEP use is strongly correlated with HIV-1 protective effects: Kenya and Uganda. In: Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections, Seattle, WA, 2012.
Norris Turner A, De Kock AE, Meehan-Ritter A, et al. Many vaginal microbicide trial participants acknowledged they had misreported sensitive sexual behavior in face-to-face interviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(7):759–65.
Mensch BS, Hewett PC, Abbott S, et al. Assessing the reporting of adherence and sexual activity in a simulated microbicide trial in South Africa: an interview mode experiment using a placebo gel. AIDS Behav. 2011; 15(2):407–21. Epub 2010/10/05.
Thomsen S, Gallo M, Ombidi W, et al. Randomised controlled trial on whether advance knowledge of prostate-specific antigen testing improves participant reporting of unprotected sex. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(5):419–20.
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Carraguard Phase II South Africa Study Team. Expanded safety and acceptability of the candidate vaginal microbicide Carraguard(R) in South Africa. Contraception. 2010; 82(6):563–71. Epub 2010/11/16.
Greene E, Batona G, Hallad J, Johnson S, Neema S, Tolley EE. Acceptability and adherence of a candidate microbicide gel among high-risk women in Africa and India. Cult Health Sex. 2010; 12(7):739–54. Epub 2010/04/17.
Coly A, Gorbach PM. Microbicide acceptability research: recent findings and evolution across phases of product development. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2008; 3(5):581–6. Epub 2009/04/18.
Severy LJ, Tolley E, Woodsong C, Guest G. A framework for examining the sustained acceptability of microbicides. AIDS Behav. 2005; 9(1):121–31. Epub 2005/04/07.
Minnis AM, Shiboski SC, Padian NS. Barrier contraceptive method acceptability and choice are not reliable indicators of use. Sex Transm Dis. 2003; 30(7):556–61. Epub 2003/07/03.
Hendrix C, Minnis A, Guddera V, Riddler S, Salata R, Nakabiito C, et al. MTN-001: A phase 2 cross-over study of daily oral and vaginal TFV in healthy, sexually active women results in significantly different product acceptability and vaginal tissue drug concentrations. In: Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections; Boston, MA, 2011.
Beigi R, Noguchi L, Parsons T, Macio I, Kunjara Na, Ayudhya R, Chen J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and placental transfer of single-dose tenofovir 1 % vaginal gel in term pregnancy. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(10):1527–31.
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Donnell D, Baeten J, Hendrix C, Bumpus N, Bangsberg D, Haberer J, et al. Tenofovir drug levels indicate PrEP use is strongly correlated with HIV-1 protective effects. In: 19th conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections; Seattle, WA, 2012.
Gafos M, Mzimela M, Sukazi S, Pool R, Montgomery C, Elford J. Intravaginal insertion in KwaZulu-Natal: sexual practices and preferences in the context of microbicide gel use. Cult Health Sex. 2010; 12(8):929–42. Epub 2010/08/26.
Montgomery CM, Gafos M, Lees S, Morar NS, Mweemba O, Ssali A, et al. Re-framing microbicide acceptability: findings from the MDP301 trial. Cult Health Sex. 2010; 12(6):649–62. Epub 2010/04/17.
MacPhail C, Terris-Prestholt F, Kumaranayake L, Ngoako P, Watts C, Rees H. Managing men: women’s dilemmas about overt and covert use of barrier methods for HIV prevention. Cult Health Sex. 2009; 11(5):485–97. Epub 2009/05/30.
Baumgartner JN, Lugina H, Johnson L, Nyamhanga T. “Being faithful” in a sexual relationship: perceptions of Tanzanian adolescents in the context of HIV and pregnancy prevention. AIDS Care. 2010; 22(9):1153–8. Epub 2010/09/09.
Minnis AM, Steiner MJ, Gallo MF, Warner L, Hobbs MM, van der Straten A, et al. Biomarker validation of reports of recent sexual activity: results of a randomized controlled study in Zimbabwe. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170(7):918–24. Epub 2009/09/11.
Rotheram-Borus MJ, Swendeman D, Chovnick G. The past, present, and future of HIV prevention: integrating behavioral, biomedical, and structural intervention strategies for the next generation of HIV prevention. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009; 5:143–67. Epub 2009/03/31.
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012